Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Goalline Tech..Is It Gonna Be In Chumpionship?


  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1 ABBEY

ABBEY

    King Venky Hater

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 23923 posts

Posted 07 July 2012 - 10:02 AM

The makers of GoalRef and Hawk-Eye goal-line technology have told Rangers they can't use the system next season.

Apparently it doesn't work with goal posts made from jumpers

I GET SLAGGED FOR BEING NEGATIVE...WHAT DOES THIS MAKE THE ONES WHO ARE HAPPY WE GOT KNOCKED OUT BY SCUNTHORPE OR THE ONES WHO THINK WE SHOULD NOT BE BEATING CARDIFF AT HOME OR THE NON STOP ROBBO BASHERS? AT LEAST MY HATE IS TARGETED AWAY FROM THE TEAM!!!! AND NOW WORST OF ALL SCOTCH ROVER WANTS FORGIVENESS AND USES DINGLESISMS WANTING THE SCUM TO LIVE FOREVER!


#2 gumboots

gumboots

    World Cup

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7134 posts

Posted 07 July 2012 - 10:09 AM

Thing that would worry me about goal line technology is that they are talking of introducing it halfway through the season - what if you have a dodgy goal given against you the week before it's introduced - either all season or not at all I'd have thought

#3 dazmaz

dazmaz

    Uefa Europa League

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1277 posts
  • Location:Sunny Blackburn



  • ST Block: NO.2

Posted 07 July 2012 - 10:17 AM

Thing that would worry me about goal line technology is that they are talking of introducing it halfway through the season - what if you have a dodgy goal given against you the week before it's introduced - either all season or not at all I'd have thought


Even more worrying is the ref can over rule it if he feels it was not a goal
The "Moron"

#4 ABBEY

ABBEY

    King Venky Hater

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 23923 posts

Posted 07 July 2012 - 10:31 AM

wont affect us especially if numb nuts adopts the same tactics as at spurs.

I GET SLAGGED FOR BEING NEGATIVE...WHAT DOES THIS MAKE THE ONES WHO ARE HAPPY WE GOT KNOCKED OUT BY SCUNTHORPE OR THE ONES WHO THINK WE SHOULD NOT BE BEATING CARDIFF AT HOME OR THE NON STOP ROBBO BASHERS? AT LEAST MY HATE IS TARGETED AWAY FROM THE TEAM!!!! AND NOW WORST OF ALL SCOTCH ROVER WANTS FORGIVENESS AND USES DINGLESISMS WANTING THE SCUM TO LIVE FOREVER!


#5 Stuart

Stuart

    Bald Eagle

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14462 posts
  • Location:Blackburn


Posted 07 July 2012 - 10:36 AM

Even more worrying is the ref can over rule it if he feels it was not a goal

Kind of makes it pointless then, and suggests it may be prone to malfunction.

Although it will be a brave referee who calls a marginal one - and gets it wrong!

"TEAM - Together Everyone Achieves More!!"


#6 AggyBlue

AggyBlue

    World Cup

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5089 posts

Posted 07 July 2012 - 10:41 AM

Don't agree with using goal line technology, leave it to the ref.

Posted Image


#7 gumboots

gumboots

    World Cup

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7134 posts

Posted 07 July 2012 - 10:46 AM

I don't mind but it's either all games in any league or division or not at all. To suggest it will be ready by Christmas is ridiculous

#8 Salgado Is A Hero

Salgado Is A Hero

    Champions League

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2986 posts

Posted 07 July 2012 - 12:47 PM

Don't agree with using goal line technology, leave it to the ref.


I'm not too bothered either way but I'm leaning towards being against it. Whether the ball crossed the line or not is equally important as goals wrongly given as offside or wrongly given penalties imo. Things even themselves out over the course of the season and even though at the moment it's just goal line technology, I can envision in a few years players/managers appealing and everyone turning to a big screen to find out who's throw-in it is.
He called me a rapist and a recluse. I'm not a recluse - Mike Tyson

#9 rigger

rigger

    Premier League

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 358 posts

Posted 08 July 2012 - 10:38 AM

Personally I am in favour of introducing technology for wheather the ball has crossed the line or not. For most other decissions, introducing honesty, into the players would help.

#10 Al

Al

    World Cup

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5616 posts

Posted 08 July 2012 - 12:26 PM

Just AggyBlue, Salgado-I-a-H and Platini then! :wacko:
Al
Growing older is like being increasingly penalised for a crime that you did not commit.

#11 Baz

Baz

    Champions League

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3406 posts

Posted 08 July 2012 - 15:20 PM

I thought the goal not given against England was telling. In the build up, a player was offside but the goal wasn't given.

What happens in the same situation with goal line technology in place? I can only assume the goal is given, which would make the technology effectively give the wrong decision.

If the technology is used, then surely it has to be used for the validity of the goal and build up to the goal, so that the correct decision is reached?
'Germany are a very difficult team to play...they had 11 internationals out there today.' - Steve Lomas

#12 Salgado Is A Hero

Salgado Is A Hero

    Champions League

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2986 posts

Posted 08 July 2012 - 16:46 PM

I thought the goal not given against England was telling. In the build up, a player was offside but the goal wasn't given.

What happens in the same situation with goal line technology in place? I can only assume the goal is given, which would make the technology effectively give the wrong decision.

If the technology is used, then surely it has to be used for the validity of the goal and build up to the goal, so that the correct decision is reached?


Exactly. Another reason it shouldn't be used. I think it was us against West Ham when they scored from a handball, offside and the ball didn't cross the line. Or something like that...Tevez was involved and I think Bowyer was as well.....if the ball had crossed the line and technology was used after the ref was unsure then there would have been massive controversy. The only solution would then be to use it for everything and play would be stopped all the time because you might as well challenge the decision.
He called me a rapist and a recluse. I'm not a recluse - Mike Tyson

#13 ultrablue

ultrablue

    Premier League

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 857 posts

Posted 08 July 2012 - 20:49 PM

Exactly. Another reason it shouldn't be used. I think it was us against West Ham when they scored from a handball, offside and the ball didn't cross the line. Or something like that...Tevez was involved and I think Bowyer was as well.....if the ball had crossed the line and technology was used after the ref was unsure then there would have been massive controversy. The only solution would then be to use it for everything and play would be stopped all the time because you might as well challenge the decision.

The Tevez goal should have been disallowed. If goal line technology had been in place then Jim Devine would have been spared a lot of abuse, as would his wife and family.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Important Legal Information


All content is copyright of its respective posters and may not be representative of the views of BRFCS Ltd, its staff, volunteers, members, sponsors or advertisers. Content on the public forums of this site is not pre-moderated. If you feel that any content is defamatory or constitutes harassment, or that it contravenes the site posting guidelines, or that it may result in the site or its owners, volunteers, users or members facing legal action, you should alert BRFCS immediately either by using the REPORT function available on every post or by sending an email to admin@brfcs.com with details of the content in question.


Note that this site uses cookies. As the site does not function without cookies, any use of the site implies consent for us to use them. Under new European law, BRFCS is required to disclose how these cookies are used. Please see our privacy policy for more information.


BRFCS Ltd. Registered in England and Wales under company registration number 07315781.