All Activity

The Beatles - Let It Be

The Head Coach has made public the view that he doesn't mind if funding is diverted away from transfers and into sorting out the pitch. Of course it's an excuse they'll latch on to.

The suggestion that Pasha doesn't like bothering them has been made numerous times on here by various individuals. Neither of us know for certain whether they have or haven't been asked at specific stages. That's not deflecting blame away from the owners, they should be hands on and invested enough in matters to be broadly aware of what's going on at the Club without having to be told everything that happens by Pasha. However I suspect that apart from a brief burst of enthusiasm after we got promoted from League 1 that's never really been the case. Im surprised you think they're particularly hands on, I suspect they set a budget at the start of the season and apart from receiving routine briefings that's the extent of their involvement unless an emergency crops up.

Its not in any way an excuse. It wouldnt excuse cutting the budget somehow even further. My issue all along is that you consistently look to deflect away from the owners. You do criticise them at times to an extent but there are often mitigating circumstances. One being the suggestion that its just that they repeatedly havent been asked for money, year after year. By numerous individuals, numerous times.

When Val eventually leaves Rovers I would love to get him, JDT and Eustace in a room. Fuck the NDA and let them tell us what their thoughts are. Could be interesting.

If it's any help, I wouldnt know how to make a small contribution to the cause even if I wanted to. Are others in the same boat or is it just me being dense?

Not to mention any costs involved. I believe Glen mentioned this weeks ago.

I’m no longer part of it but if they do see your comment then I’m sure they will in future

If Pasha has even referred the matter back to the owners or is intending to. Hypothetically, if a £2m transfer budget had been set for January (we had a c £2m surplus in summer remember) Ismael has just given him the perfect excuse not to bother them.

We all know legal stuff can drag on for months and longer. @glen9mullan is probably quiet for a very good reason. As would I and most others should be when up against a corporate company. Kind of scary really.

Thank you. Would it be possible for all communications from the coalition to be posted on here as a matter of process? Or if it is already, what is the link please.

I should have added the caveat that the 2 or 3 players wont be outright additions but will be cheaper replacements for ones sold.

But on Ismael, he has come out publically when we all expected him to bat it off/blame the ref/authorities has had a go at the embarassment caused by those above him instead. I am not a fan of Ismael to be honest. And you arent. But I can acknowledge that I like that he has done that as an individual thing rather than twisting it. The owners (if it was specifically them) shouldnt be interfering with matters they cant possibly be in the best position to judge. But especially with hindsight, I cant fathom how not selling a player for £4m who (and the owners wouldnt be aware of this) had downed tools to exchange for 2 new players who could benefit us both short and long term would be deemed as a positive. The spending thing, you are twisting it as if they were ready and waiting to go on a spending spree, similar to how you regularly suggest that they are/were "pumping in £20m" a season as if its anything other than something they have to do to cover the losses all Championship clubs incur. And most importantly, the owners. Dont forget that.

Can anyone reproduce it on here?

There was a statement posted today

It feels like the coalition of the silent, absolutely nothing for what seems like months.

Dear Rovers Fans For Christmas this year you can have EITHER A pitch that lasts 90 mins whenever it rains OR 2 or 3 more players who aren't good enough for the Championship. No, really, don't mention it. No need to thank us, it's what we do! Love Rudy, Pash, Val and the rest of the Rovers Crew. x

Legal stuff I think.

Well, there are more certainties to life than death and taxes, as soon as I mention the words "Waggott" "Mowbray" or "Gallagher" you charge in on your trusty white steed to defend them faster than Nicko comes in with a good news story now to deflect unrest whenever the **** hits the fan. Views on Rothwell vary, for me you don't sell a key player to your main rivals in that situation under any circumstances. One of the few things Venky's ever got right. I do find it bizarre though you continue to deny the fact that Mowbray dissuaded the owners from spending after promotion from League 1. Even though he cheerfully admitted it himself in the local rag.

4 hrs with a stop and no delays.

shirley the brown stuff will hit the fan if it`s postponed or abandoned again

2pm is probably the worst possible time to do an inspection if you want the game to be on, that's pretty much around when it's forecast to stop. I understand why that's the designated time, but I'd be very surprised if its on. Hours later it would probably be fine like....

I think you are allowing your dislike of individuals to cloud your judgement. As has been proven by quite a few different individuals. I also referenced that I dont like the idea of it being either the pitch or transfer money. But that is not the take home conclusion of what Ismael said today. He spoke very critically of those above him, he said it is "embarassing" and questioned the structure at the club. Him saying that he would sacrifice funds just to me suggested quite how desperate he is not to be embarassed in such a way again. Similar to how you have twisted Mowbray going out of his way to stop the owners from investing loads of money or wanting to sell 6 months worth of a Rothwell who downed tools in order to get a couple of new players in another season where the owners had turned the taps off.

Why isn’t the silence being called out by the coalition of supporter groups?