J*B Posted January 1, 2020 Share Posted January 1, 2020 1 minute ago, Mashed Potatoes said: The club's financial position shows that large transfer expenditure cannot be undertaken because we would breach the FFP rules ; that makes promotion very hard indeed for any manager - albeit not impossible - and having a safe pair of hands in charge becomes an attractive proposition Whilst it’s clearly not the easiest thing to do, the only way to work FFP is by getting the timing right. You need to have the opportunity to spend when you’re close to the playoffs and the way to do that is by either not spending in the seasons beforehand (allowing you more flexibility later down the line), making a massive sale then spending that money well or cheat the system by selling off assets to your owners. If we had the 12m now which Brereton and Gallagher have cost us, we would probably go up. Mowbray gambled on these signings, they haven’t worked. To be fair Waggot has played FFP well to ensure that we have a decent squad - but the injuries to Cunningham and Dack have essentially ruined the season. It will be another 3 years before we’ve recovered from a FFP standpoint and can go again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
Mashed Potatoes Posted January 1, 2020 Share Posted January 1, 2020 Just now, J*B said: Whilst it’s clearly not the easiest thing to do, the only way to work FFP is by getting the timing right. You need to have the opportunity to spend when you’re close to the playoffs and the way to do that is by either not spending in the seasons beforehand (allowing you more flexibility later down the line), making a massive sale then spending that money well or cheat the system by selling off assets to your owners. If we had the 12m now which Brereton and Gallagher have cost us, we would probably go up. Mowbray gambled on these signings, they haven’t worked. To be fair Waggot has played FFP well to ensure that we have a decent squad - but the injuries to Cunningham and Dack have essentially ruined the season. It will be another 3 years before we’ve recovered from a FFP standpoint and can go again. You're probably right. The one thing I would say is that cheating the system is likely to be very much harder now because some clubs - notably Steve Gibson at Middlesbrough - are watching what is going on at other clubs like hawks and are prepared to take legal action to ensure the EFL enforce the rules. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Posted January 1, 2020 Share Posted January 1, 2020 (edited) 15 minutes ago, Mashed Potatoes said: The club's financial position shows that large transfer expenditure cannot be undertaken because we would breach the FFP rules ; that makes promotion very hard indeed for any manager - albeit not impossible - and having a safe pair of hands in charge becomes an attractive proposition So with FFP constraints, Mowbray has proven he is not the right man for the job. Otherwise, it’s impossible to accept the FFP argument when the club continues to back a manager who has wasted £12m-£14m. Edited January 1, 2020 by Stuart Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomphil Posted January 1, 2020 Share Posted January 1, 2020 15 minutes ago, Mashed Potatoes said: The club's financial position shows that large transfer expenditure cannot be undertaken because we would breach the FFP rules ; that makes promotion very hard indeed for any manager - albeit not impossible - and having a safe pair of hands in charge becomes an attractive proposition That's true but it's also completely leaving out the wasted money that should have been put to better use under this manager. There are no lengths you won't go to to twist it in his favour by the looks of it. He's done some good stuff but on this one he/they have stuffed up badly - fact The way it's now being used by some to justify keeping him IN the job is almost political in its spin. Alistar Campbell would be proud. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mashed Potatoes Posted January 1, 2020 Share Posted January 1, 2020 Just now, tomphil said: That's true but it's also completely leaving out the wasted money that should have been put to better use under this manager. There are no lengths you won't go to to twist it in his favour by the looks of it. He's done some good stuff but on this one he/they have stuffed up badly - fact The way it's now being used by some to justify keeping him IN the job is almost political in its spin. Alistar Campbell would be proud. I'm trying to state the factual position as it now is with regard to the club's finances and the FFP implications - indeed there doesn't appear to be any disagreement. Leading on from there any new manager will be working with considerable financial constraints and I've given my opinion that as a consequence (1) attracting proven big name managers like some of the names regularly mentioned on here is likely to be impossible and (2) preferring a novice in Damien Johnson to an experienced man like Tony Mowbray is probably a mistake. Of course you are free to give contrary opinions. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mashed Potatoes Posted January 1, 2020 Share Posted January 1, 2020 Just now, Stuart said: So with FFP constraints, Mowbray has proven he is not the right man for the job. Otherwise, it’s impossible to accept the FFP argument when the club continues to back a manager who has wasted £12m-£14m. I don't really understand your post but if "the job" is to get promotion to the Premier League with possibly no net spend in the transfer market from now on - and possibly a requirement to turn a profit - then you must realise that "the right man" is going to be very hard to identify because it's going to be so tough to do. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldEwoodBlue Posted January 1, 2020 Share Posted January 1, 2020 (edited) At this rate we are resigned to at least another decade in the wilderness. It's like a 2 horse race between Promotion to the PL & Administration. Edited January 1, 2020 by OldEwoodBlue Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomphil Posted January 1, 2020 Share Posted January 1, 2020 Just now, Mashed Potatoes said: I'm trying to state the factual position as it now is with regard to the club's finances and the FFP implications - indeed there doesn't appear to be any disagreement. Leading on from there any new manager will be working with considerable financial constraints and I've given my opinion that as a consequence (1) attracting proven big name managers like some of the names regularly mentioned on here is likely to be impossible and (2) preferring a novice in Damien Johnson to an experienced man like Tony Mowbray is probably a mistake. Of course you are free to give contrary opinions. Which is why i'd look to change at the end of the season regardless of where we finish. To just keep him because we've no money yet he's the one who's wasted it doesn't sit well with me at all. Only in football do you get away with that but yes i'd still expect him to steer us to midtable, i'd expect that whether we have massive funds or non though ! The other option though is if he pulled a masterstroke and flogged Armstrong for say 6 million thus giving a contribution to the FFP income. That would be the way to go in my book otherwise his method of being happy with just doing enough is enough will go on and on. Until the whole squad is flogged off again of course. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mashed Potatoes Posted January 1, 2020 Share Posted January 1, 2020 You must have had a good New Years Eve to think we'll get £6m for Armstrong ! More seriously, Mowbray's contract runs to June 2022 so getting rid of him - and presumably some of his team - will cost a fair bit and mean that the new man is starting from an even worse place with FFP. I can understand why what is looking like poor signings for big money is going to end up protecting the manager is upsetting for people but we have to start from where we are rather than where we would like to be.The question is who is going to want the job if the financial constraints are so tough; the difficulty is always going to be that anyone who is any good is going to have a choice as to where they go and we just don't look like that attractive a proposition to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomphil Posted January 1, 2020 Share Posted January 1, 2020 I did say 'masterstroke' ! Putting like that the only other option would be install Johnson or someone else similar and have TM as mentor for a season. Carry on the chain and see out his contract. Doubt he'd be happy with that though unless it was his call although i do think there are plenty options to replace him for little money. We shop on the scrapheap remember and there's no compen. Some of these guys just want a wage like Coyle and will work cheap, sadly we have the wrong people picking them. We aren't at that point though i think we'll end up a bit like dingles under Ternant for another year or two. Gates will end up similar as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
47er Posted January 1, 2020 Share Posted January 1, 2020 1 hour ago, Mashed Potatoes said: and having a safe pair of hands in charge becomes an attractive proposition Let's hope we get a pair then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roverthechimp Posted January 1, 2020 Share Posted January 1, 2020 39 minutes ago, tomphil said: That's true but it's also completely leaving out the wasted money that should have been put to better use under this manager. There are no lengths you won't go to to twist it in his favour by the looks of it. He's done some good stuff but on this one he/they have stuffed up badly - fact The way it's now being used by some to justify keeping him IN the job is almost political in its spin. Alistar Campbell would be proud. For me that is the deciding factor. Gallagher i think is a TM signing and, imo, not a total waste of money though needs to get goals. BB i suspect is not a TM signing. If both are TM signings (ie they were on his "want/must" list) then he should probably be dismissed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Posted January 1, 2020 Share Posted January 1, 2020 54 minutes ago, Mashed Potatoes said: I don't really understand your post but if "the job" is to get promotion to the Premier League with possibly no net spend in the transfer market from now on - and possibly a requirement to turn a profit - then you must realise that "the right man" is going to be very hard to identify because it's going to be so tough to do. You don’t understand that you can’t hide behind FFP as preventing success when you spend £14m on players that don’t improve the first team? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mashed Potatoes Posted January 1, 2020 Share Posted January 1, 2020 Just now, Stuart said: You don’t understand that you can’t hide behind FFP as preventing success when you spend £14m on players that don’t improve the first team? I've already answered this in my previous post on this thread Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backroom DE. Posted January 1, 2020 Backroom Share Posted January 1, 2020 Mowbray himself said 70 points is the minimum target in September: https://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/sport/17930673.where-aiming-year--mowbray-outlines-rovers-target/ In that article he also talks about getting funding in January (which now appears to be backtracked on, a common theme this season sadly with the 'defenders are coming' fiasco from the summer). 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Husky Posted January 1, 2020 Share Posted January 1, 2020 He's STILL here then? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomphil Posted January 1, 2020 Share Posted January 1, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, Roverthechimp said: For me that is the deciding factor. Gallagher i think is a TM signing and, imo, not a total waste of money though needs to get goals. BB i suspect is not a TM signing. If both are TM signings (ie they were on his "want/must" list) then he should probably be dismissed. I'm similar and I actually don't mind Gallagher. Brereton I try to stay away from having a pop at him as a player, just think he's out his depth at the min. I'll question both signings though based on the amount of money and where it should have been spent. I think though imo they've looked at the academy and seen plenty midfielders and a couple of defenders who should come through but no strikers. That's led to the big money panicky maybe, young striker signings. Someone has done a good 'advising' job again upstairs. Edited January 1, 2020 by tomphil 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Posted January 1, 2020 Share Posted January 1, 2020 1 hour ago, Mashed Potatoes said: I've already answered this in my previous post on this thread So you did understand then? Strange comment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiled in Toronto Posted January 1, 2020 Share Posted January 1, 2020 Just now, tomphil said: I'm similar and I actually don't mind Gallagher. Brereton I try to stay away from having a pop at him as a player, just think he's out his depth at the min. I'll question both signings though based on the amount of money and where it should have been spent. I think though imo they've looked at the academy and seen plenty midfielders and a couple of defenders who should come through but no strikers. That's led to the big money panicky maybe, young striker signings. Someone has done a good 'advising' job again upstairs. Interesting point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mashed Potatoes Posted January 1, 2020 Share Posted January 1, 2020 Just now, Stuart said: So you did understand then? Strange comment. I had no difficulty understanding Tomphil's post; yours on the other hand................ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigbrandjohn Posted January 1, 2020 Share Posted January 1, 2020 Perhaps a move like this with Mowbray would provide a greater stability for our club going forward and silence the doubters. You can’t make this up. https://footballleagueworld.co.uk/what-a-joke-plenty-of-ipswich-town-fans-react-to-big-paul-lambert-news/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Posted January 1, 2020 Share Posted January 1, 2020 48 minutes ago, Mashed Potatoes said: I had no difficulty understanding Tomphil's post; yours on the other hand................ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluefred Posted January 1, 2020 Share Posted January 1, 2020 Time to go Mowbray, you’ve out stayed your welcome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davulsukur Posted January 1, 2020 Share Posted January 1, 2020 Doesn't have a clue as to what he is doing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Husky Posted January 1, 2020 Share Posted January 1, 2020 (edited) Needless to say we aren't going to score 3 goals in the last 25 without reply. So we're now on a 4 game winless run. Apart from the relegation favourites, when a team gets to around 5 games without a win murmurs start regarding the manager. Winter is coming. Edited January 1, 2020 by Husky Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.