rovers11 Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 So the official website has said he's staying but the FF have received an email saying the forum has been cancelled because of Shaw's dismissal...? Does anyone at the club have a clue what's going on. If Shaw can change Berg's contract without permission from India then surely he can put a statement on the website without Venky's permission. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
pedebumchin Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 The statement doesn't mention anything about the alleged investigation into Shaw and the payments... It just mentions that he is still part of the club. Technically that is true until a sacking actually happens. Although having said that, I don't trust any statement from the club anymore. So since Venky's tenure began we have had 6 managers (full or part time) and are now looking for our 4th CEO/MD... Ridiculous! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyNeil Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 So the official website has said he's staying but the FF have received an email saying the forum has been cancelled because of Shaw's dismissal...? Does anyone at the club have a clue what's going on. If Shaw can change Berg's contract without permission from India then surely he can put a statement on the website without Venky's permission. Just to be clear, the Fans Forum didn't receive an email from the club cancelling the meeting...given the current uncertainty (shall we say) around the latest farce and the fact that the club couldn't guarantee that anybody from Board level (or Shebby) would be available, we felt it was best to postpone the meeting until we can secure the attendance of somebody. Saying that, there are other matters which we had hoped to raise and we are working to get a date before the end of the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rover_Shaun Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 So it's as we were? Topic lock time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RevidgeBlue Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 With the Club denying the Shaw rumours it might mean either: a) The Mail story (and Glen's post) are incorrect or b ) Something has indeed gone on but the matter has been looked in to and Shaw has been absolved of responsibility. It does seem extremely odd to suggest that with Berg being Shebby's appointment (and Shaw not being particularly in favour by all accounts) that Shaw would then unilaterally alter the contract in Berg's favour. Maybe one of the other two are now in trouble? And Cryer's story refers to Singh being asked to India to discuss the matter. We can only hope. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ABBEY Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 Abbey?All in all it's more free publicity venky style. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grizfoot Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 They really missed a trick with that photo of Shaw on the official site. Surely for full validity they should have thrust a copy of today's LET into his hands. Leads me to think that photo was probably taken a few months ago. Like as already mentioned above it does seem rather odd that an issue regarding Berg, a Shebby Singh appointment, should invoke an investigation into Shaw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
longsiders1882 Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 Sorry to say it guys but just when I thought they had nothing left to give, they come up with yet another reason to titter. All I'm waiting for now is the photo's to emerge of the whole family in Burnley shirts because, quite simply, there can be no other explanation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AggyBlue Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 Sorry to say it guys but just when I thought they had nothing left to give, they come up with yet another reason to titter. All I'm waiting for now is the photo's to emerge of the whole family in Burnley shirts because, quite simply, there can be no other explanation Either that or their father studied in Blackburn in his younger years and received numerous kickings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mercer Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 KPMG should be beginning their work on the closing position for the 31 March accounts for the holding company. Don't be surprised if their remit is a tad wider now ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philipl Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 KPMG should be beginning their work on the closing position for the 31 March accounts for the holding company. Don't be surprised if their remit is a tad wider now ! Indeed. Incidentally if indeed we end up with a position of Shaw being suspended, Raovers look even more ridiculous. The Chairman is the top position- you are either in the Chair or not. It is almost unheard of for a Chairman to be suspended pending disciplinary action as the Chair is supposedly the boss of everyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darrenrover Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 Sorry to say it guys but just when I thought they had nothing left to give, they come up with yet another reason to titter. All I'm waiting for now is the photo's to emerge of the whole family in Burnley shirts because, quite simply, there can be no other explanation I've been saying that for ages Balaji, are you waiting for the 2013/14 strip to be released before the photo shoot? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Norbert Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 It all sounds like Shaw's job is like Shroedinger's cat. He is both fired, and in a job simultaniously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USABlue Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 Sorry to say it guys but just when I thought they had nothing left to give, they come up with yet another reason to titter. All I'm waiting for now is the photo's to emerge of the whole family in Burnley shirts because, quite simply, there can be no other explanation Hey! That was my explanation, if you are going to come on here to poke fun at least use your own material. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
windymiller7 Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 Utterly pathetic! Have you actually read it? I don't think it's quite what appears on the official site! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aberdeen Blue Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 Have you actually read it? I don't think it's quite what appears on the official site! Oh @#/?! I though it was just a screen shot of the shyte I had actually read..... Sorry Ozz!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelbo Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 Sorry to say it guys but just when I thought they had nothing left to give, they come up with yet another reason to titter. All I'm waiting for now is the photo's to emerge of the whole family in Burnley shirts because, quite simply, there can be no other explanation Longsiders, you may be close to the truth 'Burnley Balaji' and 'Clarety Singh' lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T.J.Newton Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 another day of free national publicity for the Venkys brand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pk1875 Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 In this day and age it is common practice to suspend and employee, then make sure all the legalities are covered before the sacking, that said this is Rovers so common practice goes out the window. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T.J.Newton Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 Seems like a coup of sorts has been attempted, the outcome(fallout) is unknown to us though, The message on the rovers site could be misleading, remember how fast messages went up during Appletons appointment from Shaw! which says to me he has easy un-restricted access to getting messages put up on the site. If he does go 'Aggers' MUST go with him, then its just the little Malaysian weasel to deal with! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OJRovers Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 Seems like a coo of sorts has been attempted, the outcome(fallout) is unknown to us though, The message on the rovers site could be misleading, remember how fast messages went up during Appletons appointment from Shaw! which says to me he has easy access to getting messages put up on the site. Yes, Agnew is the man for putting these messages up on the official site. I still remember the classic Christmas Party denial from Berg, which actually made things worse and made him look weak... completely accidentally of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaddyrovers Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 do any of 'In The Know' people know why the sacking of Shaw isnt happen and just been suspended??? is this down to something in Berg's contract??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T.J.Newton Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 do any of 'In The Know' people know why the sacking of Shaw isnt happen and just been suspended??? is this down to something in Berg's contract??? don't be lazy, go through the last couple of pages and make your own mind up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Graham Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 Just come out of all day meeting on the Isle of Man to read the sh!te on the Official Rovers websh!te. So is Mr Shelving in or out? What an f'ing laughing stock of the football world we have become. Venkys, Shaggy, Shagnew and the happy clappy fans.....you have a lot to answer for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaddyrovers Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 don't be lazy, go through the last couple of pages and make your own mind up. already have, but yet again doesnt answer my first question does it????? most of the 'ITK' claimed Shaw had been sack but this hasnt happened and he has just been suspended at the moment. why hasnt he??? what was amended in Berg Contract that the owners didnt like??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.