scotchrover Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 20 hours ago, RV Blue said: Bradford? We were average against them in my eyes. Our striker was isolated far too many times. Going back to 1 upfront, after 2 fantastic wins, would be criminal in my eyes. Thankfully he's not. We need to take it to Scunthorpe, rather than worrying about them! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
Tormund Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 I would be a bit annoyed if he's changing around formations, just keep it simple like we did at Rochdale. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RV Blue Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 Just now, davulsukur said: 4-2-3-1 with Samuel outwide and Antonsson upfront on his own, perhaps? Not saying that's what I want, just speculating. Possibly. I really hope not though, Samuel is an out and out striker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
islander200 Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 Just now, Tormund said: I would be a bit annoyed if he's changing around formations, just keep it simple like we did at Rochdale. I haven't seen Harper apart from his cameo for West Bromwich, can help play wide?It definitely looks to be a change of formation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J*B Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 He's only gone and done that bloody 352 again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davulsukur Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 1 minute ago, RV Blue said: Possibly. I really hope not though, Samuel is an out and out striker. I agree, I hope he's kept Samuel upfront. Edit - J*B has probably called it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdamRochina Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 We struggle tonight it's all on Mowbray Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
islander200 Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 2 minutes ago, J*B said: He's only gone and done that bloody 352 again. Ward,Mulgrew and Williams with Bennett and caddis wing backs or Caddis 1 of the 3 at the back with Williams and Bennett wing backs?Why is he switching to 3 at the back,why change what's working! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tugayislegend Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 Got a bad feeling about this one, with the tinkering formation....only 1 winger bennett, playing wingback? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Give 'Em the Axe Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 My trepidation from earlier has turned into full on pessimism. I don't fancy us with this 3 at the back carry on. Would love, love, love to be proven wrong... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyrone Shoelaces Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 Definitely not the team I would have chosen. Looks like a 4-4-2 again to me. Raya Caddis , Ward, Mulgrew, Williams Harper, Evans , Smallwood, Bennett, Samuel, Antonnson. I have a bad feeling about that line up. I wouldn't have chosen Harper or Antonnson to start. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RV Blue Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 If he was playing with 3 at the back, Downing would be playing and Williams would be playing lwb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davulsukur Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 If he has indeed switched to a back 3, it's a needless risk on Mowbrays part. If he has done and we get beat, the knives (maybe rightly so) will be out tonight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
islander200 Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 Just now, Give 'Em the Axe said: My trepidation from earlier has turned into full on pessimism. I don't fancy us with this 3 at the back carry on. Would love, love, love to be proven wrong... If we are playing three at the back then why isn't Downing starting as one of the 3?Hope to be proven wrong but am fearing another Southend or Doncaster tonight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBiz Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 13 minutes ago, J*B said: He's only gone and done that bloody 352 again. How do you get 352 Ive looked, can't see it. 442 or 4312 is my guess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Give 'Em the Axe Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 Dunno mate, just going off other people's interpretation of the starting XI. Southend/Doncaster is exactly what's in my mind, too. Knock wood there'll be sterner stuff on display. This Harper kid had want to be bloody good and up for a battle given that this is one of toughest fixtures so far this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIMON GARNERS 194 Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 Hmmmm.....we'll soon find out! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Preben Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 I don't expect this to be popular but win, lose or draw tonight I am certain that the manager knows his players and the opposition far better than anyone on here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philipl Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 Just now, Biz said: How do you get 352 Ive looked, can't see it. 442 or 4312 is my guess Glad I am not the only one who couldn't work out a 3-5-2. Seems to be conventional 4-4-2 with Harper for Conway the only surprise seeing as Mulgrew is fit again and therefore certain to replace Dowling. Excited that Mowbray thinks Harper is ready. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
islander200 Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 Just now, philipl said: Glad I am not the only one who couldn't work out a 3-5-2. Seems to be conventional 4-4-2 with Harper for Conway the only surprise seeing as Mulgrew is fit again and therefore certain to replace Dowling. Excited that Mowbray thinks Harper is ready. From what I've read which ok isn't the same as seeing but Harper isn't a wide player if it is 4-4-2 would rather have seen Chapman start who is a natural wide player and guarantees width Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyrone Shoelaces Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 Just now, philipl said: Glad I am not the only one who couldn't work out a 3-5-2. Seems to be conventional 4-4-2 with Harper for Conway the only surprise seeing as Mulgrew is fit again and therefore certain to replace Dowling. Excited that Mowbray thinks Harper is ready. Too many " football manager " gamers who haven't actually got a clue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBiz Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 Just now, philipl said: Glad I am not the only one who couldn't work out a 3-5-2. Seems to be conventional 4-4-2 with Harper for Conway the only surprise seeing as Mulgrew is fit again and therefore certain to replace Dowling. Excited that Mowbray thinks Harper is ready. Could potentially see a 433 with Samuel and Bennet either side of Antonsson if Harper goes in the middle also. I think Mowbray knows the league, so I'm guessing this lad is a bit good... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HowieFive0 Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 Maybe TM has seen a chink in Scunnys team which we havent ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bazza Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 Maybe WBA have told TM to play Harper or we take him back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
islander200 Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 Just now, Biz said: Could potentially see a 433 with Samuel and Bennet either side of Antonsson if Harper goes in the middle also. I think Mowbray knows the league, so I'm guessing this lad is a bit good... That was my initial thought until it was said it was 3 at the back.But I'm not keen on that either as Samuel looks better through the middle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.