Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

Rovers vs Villa - post match discussion inc. MOTM Poll


J*B

Who was your MOTM?  

80 members have voted

  1. 1. Man of the Match

    • Raya
      0
    • Nyambe
      12
    • Lenihan
      0
    • Mulgrew
      19
    • Bell
      3
    • Evans
      1
    • Smallwood
      3
    • Bennett
      3
    • Dack
      28
    • Armstrong
      0
    • Graham
      9
    • Reed
      1
    • Williams
      1
    • Brereton
      0


Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, tomphil said:

Brereton looked lively a few times when the ball dropped to him inside the box but like a fish out of water out wide and yes I know he's only 19 but he's very lightweight I thought we were buying a lad with physical attributes ?

Genuine question, no judgement of Brereton's abilities at all, but how does the 'loan with a view to permanent move' work ?

Are we committed to signing him or can we simply send him back in January if things don't work out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Crimpshrine said:

Genuine question, no judgement of Brereton's abilities at all, but how does the 'loan with a view to permanent move' work ?

Are we committed to signing him or can we simply send him back in January if things don't work out?

I've heard different versions, we are committed sign him so basically he's ours now whatever it's just that it has to wait till after Jan to be rubber stamped.

Also, we can back out but they can't is another version.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, blueboy3333 said:

I doubt they agreed to that.

Me neither but it was doing the rounds.

Basically he's our player now full time they probably just don't have to start paying for him aside from a deposit classed as a loan fee until after Jan.

I hope to god they don't plant to sell to buy this lad !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, S8 & Blue said:

Arms can’t be offside.

I stand corrected. I guess it comes down to how much of his upper body the linesman deemed offside.

From a free kick though Dack shouldn’t be giving the linesman a decision really but it looks like he has been robbed there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Stuart said:

I stand corrected. I guess it comes down to how much of his upper body the linesman deemed offside.

From a free kick though Dack shouldn’t be giving the linesman a decision really but it looks like he has been robbed there.

When it is as close as this the Assistants are instructed to give the benefit of doubt to the attacking side. The Assistant didn't appear to be in line with the second rear most defender.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wasnt at the game and only just saw the goal highlights yesterday. I thought some people were overreacting talking about the keeper and walls fault for letting a direct free kick in...however having seen the highlights the wall was very poor. The ball didnt go up and over the wall it went through the massive gap left to the keepers right. There were only 3 in the wall, one or two more would have stopped that free kick. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Stuart said:

I stand corrected. I guess it comes down to how much of his upper body the linesman deemed offside.

From a free kick though Dack shouldn’t be giving the linesman a decision really but it looks like he has been robbed there.

What are you talking about? If he is onside he has every right to give the linesman a decision, its up the the linesman to get it right. Whats he supposed to do, stand 5 feet onside in case the linesman gets it wrong? The attacker is meant to get the benefit in these situations. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Stuart said:

I stand corrected. I guess it comes down to how much of his upper body the linesman deemed offside.

From a free kick though Dack shouldn’t be giving the linesman a decision really but it looks like he has been robbed there.

I hope we don't get that linesman again. Seems like the type who judges tricky players offside because their eyes can't keep up with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • J*B unpinned this topic
10 hours ago, arbitro said:

When it is as close as this the Assistants are instructed to give the benefit of doubt to the attacking side. The Assistant didn't appear to be in line with the second rear most defender.

 

7 hours ago, booth said:

I hope we don't get that linesman again. Seems like the type who judges tricky players offside because their eyes can't keep up with them.

It’s nice to converse with people who are capable of civilised interaction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.