Crimpshrine Posted September 17, 2018 Share Posted September 17, 2018 13 hours ago, tomphil said: Brereton looked lively a few times when the ball dropped to him inside the box but like a fish out of water out wide and yes I know he's only 19 but he's very lightweight I thought we were buying a lad with physical attributes ? Genuine question, no judgement of Brereton's abilities at all, but how does the 'loan with a view to permanent move' work ? Are we committed to signing him or can we simply send him back in January if things don't work out? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
blueboy3333 Posted September 17, 2018 Share Posted September 17, 2018 Just now, Crimpshrine said: Genuine question, no judgement of Brereton's abilities at all, but how does the 'loan with a view to permanent move' work ? Are we committed to signing him or can we simply send him back in January if things don't work out? Committed to signing him apparently. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crimpshrine Posted September 17, 2018 Share Posted September 17, 2018 Just now, blueboy3333 said: Committed to signing him apparently. I thought so. But if that is the case then what is the point in ending the permanent transfer window early when this is, in effect, a permanent transfer? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueboy3333 Posted September 17, 2018 Share Posted September 17, 2018 3 minutes ago, Crimpshrine said: I thought so. But if that is the case then what is the point in ending the permanent transfer window early when this is, in effect, a permanent transfer? Exactly. We effectively had 2 transfer windows in one summer. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomphil Posted September 17, 2018 Share Posted September 17, 2018 58 minutes ago, Crimpshrine said: Genuine question, no judgement of Brereton's abilities at all, but how does the 'loan with a view to permanent move' work ? Are we committed to signing him or can we simply send him back in January if things don't work out? I've heard different versions, we are committed sign him so basically he's ours now whatever it's just that it has to wait till after Jan to be rubber stamped. Also, we can back out but they can't is another version. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueboy3333 Posted September 17, 2018 Share Posted September 17, 2018 11 minutes ago, tomphil said: Also, we can back out but they can't is another version. I doubt they agreed to that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomphil Posted September 17, 2018 Share Posted September 17, 2018 Just now, blueboy3333 said: I doubt they agreed to that. Me neither but it was doing the rounds. Basically he's our player now full time they probably just don't have to start paying for him aside from a deposit classed as a loan fee until after Jan. I hope to god they don't plant to sell to buy this lad ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neophox Posted September 17, 2018 Share Posted September 17, 2018 Villa rode their luck.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
booth Posted September 17, 2018 Share Posted September 17, 2018 @Stuart from the previous thread. There was another angle right along the line that showed it wasn't offside. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Speedie's Gonna Get Ya Posted September 17, 2018 Share Posted September 17, 2018 9 hours ago, Tyrone Shoelaces said: Tony Daley , where did he go wrong ? Where as a David Platt went from strength to strength after his debut goal against us, after signing from Crewe? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Posted September 17, 2018 Share Posted September 17, 2018 1 hour ago, booth said: @Stuart from the previous thread. There was another angle right along the line that showed it wasn't offside. Not seen it. The angle I saw it looked as though Dack’s arm was the part of his body offside. His feet looked in line. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SBlue Posted September 17, 2018 Share Posted September 17, 2018 Just now, Stuart said: Not seen it. The angle I saw it looked as though Dack’s arm was the part of his body offside. His feet looked in line. Arms can’t be offside. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 7 hours ago, S8 & Blue said: Arms can’t be offside. I stand corrected. I guess it comes down to how much of his upper body the linesman deemed offside. From a free kick though Dack shouldn’t be giving the linesman a decision really but it looks like he has been robbed there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arbitro Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 47 minutes ago, Stuart said: I stand corrected. I guess it comes down to how much of his upper body the linesman deemed offside. From a free kick though Dack shouldn’t be giving the linesman a decision really but it looks like he has been robbed there. When it is as close as this the Assistants are instructed to give the benefit of doubt to the attacking side. The Assistant didn't appear to be in line with the second rear most defender. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benhben Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 Wasnt at the game and only just saw the goal highlights yesterday. I thought some people were overreacting talking about the keeper and walls fault for letting a direct free kick in...however having seen the highlights the wall was very poor. The ball didnt go up and over the wall it went through the massive gap left to the keepers right. There were only 3 in the wall, one or two more would have stopped that free kick. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigdoggsteel Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 2 hours ago, Stuart said: I stand corrected. I guess it comes down to how much of his upper body the linesman deemed offside. From a free kick though Dack shouldn’t be giving the linesman a decision really but it looks like he has been robbed there. What are you talking about? If he is onside he has every right to give the linesman a decision, its up the the linesman to get it right. Whats he supposed to do, stand 5 feet onside in case the linesman gets it wrong? The attacker is meant to get the benefit in these situations. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
booth Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 3 hours ago, Stuart said: I stand corrected. I guess it comes down to how much of his upper body the linesman deemed offside. From a free kick though Dack shouldn’t be giving the linesman a decision really but it looks like he has been robbed there. I hope we don't get that linesman again. Seems like the type who judges tricky players offside because their eyes can't keep up with them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 10 hours ago, arbitro said: When it is as close as this the Assistants are instructed to give the benefit of doubt to the attacking side. The Assistant didn't appear to be in line with the second rear most defender. 7 hours ago, booth said: I hope we don't get that linesman again. Seems like the type who judges tricky players offside because their eyes can't keep up with them. It’s nice to converse with people who are capable of civilised interaction. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.