Some excellent debate here, with some well informed opinions, that raise some questions.

1. If Flybe is deemed as being 'to big' for the trust fund to support is it possible that Rovers could be seen this way by the trustees.  We are not a successful expanding buisness, but our need for ever greater transfer fees could be viewed this way.

2. If Flybe is sold off, does that mean Rovers will get a share of a bigger pot, as there is one less snout in the trough.

3. With the appointment David Brown, is it conceivable that a long term plan is being drawn up to sell off Rovers. Thus severing ties with the trustees and ultimately the Walkers.

4. Leaving all conspiracy theories aside, is this the best possible way of restructuring the board to ensure success for Rovers.

328045[/snapback]