He is off to Spurs, so what does it matter?!

Aren't they all............

Dillo, just gotta praise your pictures!

You show some high photographic skills here, good work dude

Wow! Designs for next years shirts are ot that we can choose, our sponsers for the next few years have been revealed, we have done the double on Ushited, Bentley got a hat trick AND our boss is touting Europe, not avoiding relegation as our goal.

Am I dreaming?

380994[/snapback]

Yeah, I sometimes think for a second I have logged into wrong club forum these days

Hopefully they'll change the logo to fit the shirt better

Doubt the Walkers will be there. They probably don't even know who Rovers are playing.

338452[/snapback]

Is that something John Williams told you when you met?

I seem to recall it being blue and white halves.

329806[/snapback]

WHAT???? Have they mocked up our traditional white and blue halves then???

I can't be the only person wondering why Ipswich let a 20 goal striker go on a free?

328176[/snapback]

Not wanting to go off topic, but Kuqis contract ran out, Ipswich offered him an improved one but he didn't want to sign, as he opted for a place in the PL. There wasn't really anything they could do about it.

As such, I think it's wrong to say they let him go on a free, it's not like the situation last year when we let Cole go on a free.

</offtopic>

It doesn't matter what numbers they wear, they're no longer team numbers, but squad numbers.

328047[/snapback]

That explains why we have so many squad players......

there might also be a game between Swansea and Ewood

320664[/snapback]

Now who'd wanna miss that?

Apologies if this has already been posted:

Official page of the Manchester Buccaneers

320085[/snapback]

Pure class!

Can't believe the mancs taking it seriously

In other words; In the end the supporters pay the whole party for him.

That's true of any club.

Of course I know that....

However at which price?

By the way, I'm only writing what I know the case is amongst Scum supporters, it's not my concerns.

I'm actually enjoying this, funniest thing in footy since we played the dingles

Good point made by the Guardian that most people are ignoring:

"The only consolation for fans is that since Malcolm Glazer is in it for the money, he will surely have to keep spending enough of it to maintain and improve the club's performance in order to cash in on his worldwide marketing ambitions. If the club sinks down the league table, then so does United's brand value. As with football clubs everywhere, nothing succeeds like success."

Also, Glazer is a smart enough business man to not buy the team if it was going to be a money losing proposition. Sorry Philip, but I'd trust the financial acumen of a man who has made plenty of money on "bad" purchases (he spent $50 million over the odds for the Bucs, but they are probably worth double his original investment) than you.

That's not the whole point, American.

What the mancs are afraid of is, for Glazer to make money on this, that the tickets and everything associated with the "club" will be priced skyhigh.

Thus if he makes money on the club, it's because the supporters have had to spend more money.

He wont care if the true fans can't afford going to the matches, as there are plenty of tourists willing to spend half their travelling budget at Old Trafford.

Not to mention that they are more likely to be ripped off in the club store as well.

In other words; In the end the supporters pay the whole party for him.

Oh, and I'm sorry for starting a non-Rovers topic. Please continue to discuss Arsenals 7-0 defeat of Everton and Terry Venables' carreer.....

Style points achieved, Rainmaker

The latest is that he did not show up for training today, noone knows where he is, and Lyn are considering calling the police

At least two different agents claims to have a deal with him, which is supposed to give each of them 30% of his wages at his new club.

still the greatest ever ;-)

and if he comes up with greater signings in the future, that's just great

but we like winding you Scandanavians up

I dont care who scores as long as we score more than them

Same for me Flopsy, I don't care who scores.

Mceverly, Fridal, Gallacher, Nelson, Johansen, Janson, or even Mokena.

As long as they're not Dingles )

In no particular order;

5 other teams than Rovers:

- Norway national team

- Vålenga (local team)

- HJK (due to my finnish roots)

- AFC Wimbledon (The supporters have my full respect for what they've done)

- Anyone playing the dingles

He didn't refuse to play. He was dropped.

According to Mark Hughes, he did refuse to play the last cup game.

The days of Souey are over, therefore no Arveladze.

I'm sure with him still in charge, we'd say thank you to both him and Ball, with no money involved.

This Hughes guy aint that easy to fool

I would imagine Rovers are trying to rush this through now. Am I correct in saying that if a bid is accepted before midnight we are still allowed to continue any transfer dealings?

I don't think that's how it works, but I could be wrong

PHEW he passed the medical! Sweating on that! Hopefully we can pay out for carew and koumas now!

As I've said before, Carew would have no interest in signing for us. The spoilt kid needs a flashy club

Heres a thought..if the playoffs had existed in the 70s and eighties when Rovers were always near ,we might have gone up much earlier and Simon Garner & Co may have become England players

another thought;

if we got zidane, keane, etc....

well, we didn't

then let's have sutty, I'll take anything!

Whatever you're on, unleaded, can I have some?

3-3 Birmingham against Birmingham two months ago...

What?

Didn't Brum think any of the clubs were big enough to play against, so the only option they had to play a big game was against themselves?

I missed that one