Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

JHRover

Members
  • Posts

    12617
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    185

Posts posted by JHRover

  1. Waggott is the human manifestation of Venkys.

    Inadequate, incompetent, untrustworthy, out of his depth, embarrassing 

    Should be nowhere near running a professional football club, definitely not one in the second tier of English football 

    Yet here he is. And until he's gone along with his disgusting bosses we are only going one way.

    • Like 5
  2. Pretty sure they are capped at £30 a ticket for any Premier League game

    Ipswich are selling season tickets from Monday, starting from £381 an adult. So cheaper than us, in a more affluent region, and offering a far superior product, despite 'not knowing what league they are going to be in'

    How is that possible Waggott?

    • Like 3
  3. The party line is 'human error'. That's what they are all saying because it is the only thing they can think up other than admitting that the problem lies in India, which will see immediate dismissal.

    Of course it wasn't human error. Once and that might be believable, but to happen at least 3 times in a year and coincidentally only on the potential expensive / cash buys coming in and not on the frees, loans and sales, says it all.

    There would never have been 'human error' on signing off the Adam Wharton cash bonanza coming in, that's for sure.

    Liars the lot of them.

    I've got no axe to grind with Broughton. I suspect he is well intentioned and would want to be successful here. But like so many before him he has fallen foul of a sham, a con, a facade of a normal well intentioned ambitious football club but scratch ever so slightly at the surface and the rotten reality becomes clear. He would be wise to plan his exit ASAP. It would be career suicide to remain here, only those with no ambition or no prospect of higher/better employment elsewhere would stick around here, hence being run by the lowlife we are.

    • Like 7
  4. 14 minutes ago, Hasta said:

    I know this is done to death, but Leeds fans get overcharged as category A+ games everywhere they go. Even. couple a years ago we introduced a special category to charge them £40 at Ewood !

    Therefore following discussions with their fans, Leeds agreed to offer all clubs this season the offer of either £21 or £28 tickets at Elland Road if this was reciprocated in the away fixture. We decided not to take them up on this in order to charge then £30. Therefore look back at Ewood for the blame on that one.

    What is shitty by Leeds is that it appears the tickets have to be fixed at £21 or £28 and discounted to one of those prices for the reciprocal pricing to be agreed. Therefore Rotherham charged them £27 as that's their standard away pricing but, as they didn't discount to £21, they then got charged £45 at Elland Road. That's nonsense. The argument is if we are discounting tickets to make this work then so should you, but their should be a £25 option as well.

    Interestingly it was Ken Bates who moved the away fans at Leeds into the West Stand. Home fans are charged £47 in the West Stand and it is EFL rules that states away fans have to be charged the same as home fans for the same seating. Reciprocal pricing is the loophole that allows this to be reduced. I know their EFL brought that rule in to stop away fans being ripped off, but in this instance it's actually doing the opposite.  Bates probably knew full well that if away fans didn't take their allocation, the home fans would fill it instead at £47. 

    Indeed. Away fans were previously housed in the yellow corner at Elland Road which is the worst seating and lowest price. The move to the main stand allows them to charge away fans top prices.

    They also aren't bothered if away fans don't buy tickets because they can allocate the bottom area to home fans if take up is low and will sell out when top of the league.

    I expect similar at Leicester where they will either be celebrating promotion or in need of a win to go up. They'll want Rovers fans in low numbers so they can give extra seats to the home fans, who will pay anything for such an occasion. So expect £35+ for that one too.

    • Like 1
  5. Ipswich had the fortune to be taken over by a group of people with a plan and ambition, Americans who have come in to get a return on their investment, and they've already started to do that by selling a share of the club for big money.

    This all runs contrary to the negative elements of the fanbase who wish to convince themselves and others that we have no such option, that there is no alternative for this club than to exist as a decaying rotting husk under Venkys forever.

    People call me negative yet I believe there is a better brighter alternative to the awful people that own and manage us today, whereas those who refuse to countenance such a possibility and resort to name calling and the rest rather than open their eyes to the possibility of a better future. 

    Absolutely no sympathy towards the owners and board who have created the injury issues themselves. Ironic that they'll be moaning about absences if Buckley is out when we fired him off to Sheffield Wednesday not long ago supposedly surplus to requirements and we have our captain who will be sat on his backside cheering on his Ipswich team-mates from the stands on Friday due to further Rovers nonsense.

    You reap what you sow.

    • Like 6
  6. 34 minutes ago, tomphil said:

    All this 'needs approval from India' stuff that gets blamed for everything i'm thinking now it's just a smoke screen.

    Shadowman and Waggot get the budget then run the club their way whilst trying to bother the owners as little as poss in order to get their own brownie points.

    A real comfortable number as long as ..

    lights are kept on.

    Costs are cut.

    You don't bother the owners unless you have to.

    It's probably been these two all along that have zero ambition for anything other than their own wages. Take no risks, push for nothing unless asked or told and just exist in the twilight zone, getting to close to the spotlight then draw your horns in again.

    Largely agreed although I think the 'big' deals like O'Brien and McGuire - where the wage bill needs stretching or cash needs putting up beyond the set summer budget - requires their special permission and authorisation.

    Owners set a budget in the summer, Waggott and shadow man left to get on with it. This will cover the essential costs and they have permission to reinvest a percentage of money generated so long as the wage bill comes down.

    Either permission for extra spending is too slow to come through, they don't agree to it or Waggott and shadow man don't even ask them not wanting to cause any turbulence it's fundamentally getting permission from India to do something that is the issue.

    • Like 2
  7. He's unfit to be CEO at any normal, sensible, stable football club.

    Oh yeah, he never has been.

    Distressed, mismanaged, failing clubs are his business. Charlton, Coventry, Southend, Gillingham, Rovers. Odd that he keeps ending up at such failing organisations yet never gets a job at a stable organisation.

    • Like 5
  8. When anyone worries themselves about promotion and relegation it would be useful to remember this sort of thing. Whilst we are now fighting to preserve our Championship status the CEO and shadow man are scurrying like rats in the shadows trying to find new ways of getting players out and off the wage bill. Even going behind the manager's back and undermining him in the process.

    They're not here to do any good by BRFC. Promotion, relegation, progress, growth, improvement - never on the agenda with this lowlife scum. They're paid to do one thing and one thing only.

    We need shut of the lot of them and this club will never improve or prosper until they are history.

    • Like 5
  9. 12 minutes ago, arbitro said:

    I was told last night that on the last day of the window Pasha and Waggott arranged a loan deal for a player Tomasson rated behind his back. Tomasson got wind of this and asked the player who told him it was true but he was of the understanding that Tomasson had agreed to it. Tomasson went ballistic at those two and went to town on them, it was said to me that it was the straw that broke the camel's back. Being the cowards that are they were scared they would be called out in his press conference the day before the QPR game and stopped him doing it. This ties in with the 'ask Steve and Pasha' comment after the QPR game.

    And Broughton knew nothing of this scurrilous deal.

    I was told the name of the player but it would be unfair to name him.

     

    These kind of slippery underhand maneouvurings are no surprise at all to me. I'm convinced that a number of Mowbray's signings were arranged without his input or involvement.

    Why though, if Tomasson rated the player, would they be so sneaky about it?

  10. 1 hour ago, OldEwoodBlue said:

    Screenshot_20240321_071824_Chrome.jpg

    So our average gate is actually less than it was 10 years ago at this same level.

    Meanwhile just about everyone else has enjoyed significant increases of several thousand.

    A crisis for the long term health of the club and its fanbase. Created by negligent owners and their underlings. Assisted by those supporters who focus their energies on the 80s and comparing numbers to those days.

    • Like 7
  11. We charged Bristol fans £20 when they came to Ewood in December. So Rovers' away fans getting rinsed again. Just like we will at Leeds soon when they charge upwards of £40 for a televised game substantially more than we charged their fans at Ewood.

    Eventually the penny might drop at Rovers that the way to deal with this is charge other clubs what they charge us, and offer proper discounts to Rovers fans who sign up to be members.

    • Like 1
  12. Rowett a strong option for a struggling side.

    Birmingham owners a bit clueless with the Rooney thing but like most will take drastic action where required to try and save their Championship status.

    You compare to what has happened here this season and in 2017 where relegation is practically invited by the owners.

  13. 1 hour ago, chaddyrovers said:

    Won't be this week as LT reporter Elliott Jackson is on holiday in the USA so I guess it will be next week

    So communication with the fanbase now relies on the holiday arrangements of the Telegraph reporter?

    Broughton could convene a press conference and invite local media. Telegraph's job to find someone else to send or miss out.

    • Like 6
  14. 26 minutes ago, RevidgeBlue said:

     

    Everyone should keep a copy of this statement close to hand in case there is no change to the current situation. The Club and owners will have hung themselves by their own petard should that turn out to be the case.

    Simple solution to that little problem....blame the boogeyman or in our case good old FFP.

    Owners are doing all they can, desperate to invest etc. but it just isn't fair because our low crowds and FFP make it impossible

    (Please ignore the £30 million from player sales and the crumbling infrastructure not constrained by FFP)

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.