Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

VinjayV4

Members
  • Posts

    1645
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by VinjayV4

  1. Why not just ignore FUP and build a super club in spite of the rules?

    Nottingham Forest meet Football League to discuss FUP embargo

    First article offers an interesting if somewhat unlikely way to combat FUP if it takes more time to collapse completely. The owner of Forest personally met up with the Football League whereas Rovers probably sent Derek Shaw...enough said. Galatasaray are also appealing their European suspension.

  2. Here's the Sports Shield website...can't say the content particularly impresses me however glossy it might look.

    http://www.sportsshield.co.uk/

    What's the tax rules in the Isle of Man (?) since people have accused Davies of using BWFC as a tax writeoff. Thought it was the same as Jersey but might have somehow mixed it up with Pokerstars and gambling "offshore" laws.

    Seneca aren't specifically a sports investment company of course but they might have had similar issues here with backers "in and out".

  3. Looks like they may have just been trying to buy time to see if they could get some points on the board or throw in the towel with admin. Never seemed very concrete that Holdsworth thing as they couldn't show they had money to run the club right from the off.

    Not concrete at all but seems like it was actually better than the other options! I heard one of the Sports Shield backers had pulled out so has the whole thing collapsed now? Nixon stated that the football league even said they would keep an eye on Sports Shield which says a lot about their tests!

  4. I'm certainly no fan of the 2nd best Ronaldo but how ridiculous is this? The "prestige" of Real Madrid where you can get booed for no reason.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2016/03/09/cristiano-ronaldo-booed-by-his-own-fans/

    Obviously the money there is a factor but there's plenty of clubs you can make big money and not be treated like that. Says a lot when you leave United for a club where the fans are even more outrageous with their demands.

    Maybe Dunn should tell Real to "get real" lol.

  5. Be interesting to see what the Shane angle becomes. Will it lead to a brand split? WWE vs NXT (Shane vs HHH)? Is it a swerve of some sort? May we see a return to TV -13 (thinking of WWE actually helping Reigns 'get bloodied' which they never do).

    Read somewhere he actually used a blood capsule rather than "blading" but it still breaks the "no blood policy." I'm not that bothered if there's blood generally but for cage/cell matches there should be. I'm surprised they haven't introduced "first nosebleed" after somehow managing to "water down" an inferno match. Speaking of first blood remember a match with HHH on one of the old Smackdown games. Bell rings, eyerake, HHH is the winner lol!

    Apparently they have intentionally been edgier recently and plan to be until WM at least. Examples being the blood, Vince cursing on Raw and Goldust having an accident with a champagne bottle. (use your imagination lol)

  6. Now that Platini has been exposed and deposed, maybe they will realise that FUP only benefits the big clubs and revise it, particularly below the top leagues.

    Infantino wins FIFA election but at least he's out of UEFA. Hopefully he won't try and enforce some form of FIFA FUP. (Not that there hasn't been FUP aka general corruption at FIFA for years)

    https://uk.sports.yahoo.com/news/infantino-goes-stop-gap-footballs-most-powerful-man-170548669--sow.html

  7. Shane McMahon returning on Raw was a cool moment. Been a while since I've seen a crowd react quite like that.

    Dave Meltzer (major wrestling journalist) says Shane tried to purchase a "major soccer team" in the UK but didn't manage to get the financing together. He's certainly rich but as David Gold pointed out in his free website autobiography there's a difference between being "cash rich" and "asset rich." Jack Walker became "mega cash rich" after selling Walkersteel at the right time. I would imagine Shane's personal worth is probably well into the 8 figure range but that could include WWE stock, investments, etc.

    There was a rumor about Vince buying Newcastle a few years ago. Complete snobbery from the person who responded to that rumor too. Did a quick search on google and Meltzer said a couple of years ago they may have confused Vince with Shane.

    No reason to make it up so its probably true Shane had a look at Newcastle.

  8. Sounds like something the mafia would do. The authorities only apply FUP to clubs they know won't fight it, and don't want to really deal with basket case clubs like QPR.

    There's different kinds of organised crime syndicates like the ones featured in this case...

    http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/10176929/sepp-blatter-and-michel-platini-expected-to-lose-appeals-against-eight-year-bans

  9. Agreed. It appears that FUP rules are tackling annual club losses rather than overall debt. Probably to avoid upsetting Manchester United. I expect that leveraged buy-outs are perfectly legal so it would be difficult to outlaw.

    I certainly agree that if a rich owner wants to pump his own money into a club, and not issue loans or mortgage any player contracts against future income then they should be allowed to. It's every football fan's dream that a Jack Walker rocks up - probably why everyone hates us.

    Or anyone else since who's been the subject of a major takeover though too many fans play the "hate" card. United scoring a full scale victory with FUP would be their ultimate revenge over clubs like Rovers who have stood up to them. Every club should fight it but Rovers should be near the very top if not at the very top. I don't want to rant about Jack's wishes but there couldn't be the slightest justification to suggest he wouldn't be vehemently anti-FUP. In all fairness not like I had flowers flown to his gravesite and made a huge deal of it by plastering it all over a website for PR purposes.

    Of course United complain about other clubs having benefactors yet whine when the Glazers milk them for profit.

    No punches pulled with this headline...though it is a few months old...

    Manchester United owners the Glazer family are 'the evil of football', say Sunday Supplement panel

    Once again mentioning the bleaker prospects of Newcastle, Villa, Everton, etc in being taken over. Since the foundations of FUP were laid in 2009 its no wonder Anderson was hired (perhaps in 2009 and definitely in 2010) to seek buyers for Rovers. Of course Rothschild were appointed earlier and that didn't really seem to lead anywhere.

    I know people might not like me dragging the thread up (though its not like I'm posting 10+ times a day in this thread) but FUP is nothing short of a cancer to football.

    If this had happened in the early 90's hopefully Jack would have sued the hell out of them in the very highest supreme European courts. I wish Abramovich, Mansour, etc would team up and blow the crooked cretins apart.

    WE HATE FUP, SAY WE HATE FUP!

    WE HATE TWATINI, SAY WE HATE TWATINI!

  10. Wholly agreed on Hanley. Never thought I'd see him being the one to organise defence.

    Genuinely think it bodes well that Lambert will be an idol to both Hanley and Duffy.

    Shane Duffy considers Grant Hanley performer of the season thus far.

    http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/sport/football/rovers/news/14289358.Shane_Duffy__Grant_Hanley_has_been__head_and_shoulders__above_every_other_Blackburn_Rovers_player/?ref=mac

  11. FUP rules are relaxed in Smmer, so Venky's can carry on taking the hit for the income deficit, like they have since we got relegated. If they give PL only what he brings in, Including the Rhodes money, that's a sizeable sum and personally I have faith that he will assemble a squad capable of at least the playoffs with it. You can't rule out the fact that Venkys are morons of course, but the one thing they haven't been shy of doing is putting in money (whose it is, is debatable). With the relaxed rules and a top management team for this division, we have to be in with a good shot.

    Now we just have to stay in this division!

    Elaborate?

  12. FFP should only be limited to say that a clubs owners can invest what they want into a club, as long as it is cash, not loans, or debts, including leveraged buyouts, with a secondary rule that any players wages that would put a club above a 100% wage to turnover % should also be funded directly by the owners.

    After that, if someone is stupid enough to want to sign James Milner and pay him 1/2 a million a month, that's their own problem.

    Well at least anyone who signs Milner will get effort and versatility. I could argue Liverpool would have been stupid not to sign him.

    Shame people like Sheikh Mansour and Abramovich haven't teamed up and assembled a dream team of lawyers to crush FUP once and for all. I won't be happy until its gone completely simply "relaxing" it isn't good enough. Perhaps the likes of Villa fans can stage a protest outside UEFA HQ as well since FUP is a major reason nobodies bought them in the first place.

  13. Pacquiao not being seen as such a great guy these days. Nike have dropped his sponsorship due to these comments.

    http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/boxing/6938620/Manny-Pacquiao-is-dropped-by-sponsors-Nike-after-describing-gay-couples-as-worse-than-animals.html

    He was also sued earlier this year (not sure of the outcome whatever it was) for failing to disclose an injury. Pacquiao topped Mayweather in a televised poll the night of their fight but clearly popularity isn't always the same as ability.

    At least Mayweather has never pretended to be a "great guy" unlike Pacquiao.

  14. I think this thread should be closed.

    Not a cat in hell's chance of Rovers going down.

    Lets hope next season there will be a promotion thread.

    Definitely don't think so either unless there's an injury list comparable to 98/99. Or comparable to this one like United have at the moment.

    CbcJ9qSUkAADIHU.png

    Can't remember if it was mentioned on here but Wigan Athletic look to be taking over Bolton's training ground facilities aside from their academy. It does not seem like Wigan have had the problems that have crippled Bolton. They still have parachute payments though (giving them an advantage in League 1) and presumably subsidising from Whelan still. Unlike Bolton with Davies.

    Apparently former United/Chelsea CEO Peter Kenyon is working with Tamraz on the deal. At some point he was (and maybe still is) working with Middlesbrough in an advisory capacity. Reportedly he's also transformed Atletico Madrid's finances for money making potential. Seem to recall a thread linking him to Rovers (quite a while ago now) was there any truth in that as far as an advisory position?

  15. Bolton aren't dead and buried yet by any stretch, though saying that, having just googled it, the deadline for resolving their financial issues is in 5 days, so there may be a 10 point deduction afoot yet......

    Eddie Davies (owner) seems to be favoring Roger Tamraz (according to Nixon) and there's several question marks over him. Criminal history, over 70, etc. Davies shockingly spoke this past week (makes Paul Egerton-Vernon look like a loudmouth in comparison) but Tamraz hardly seems to be protecting Gartside's legacy. Whatever that was in all due respect to the dead.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.