Jump to content

KidderStreetNoise

Members
  • Posts

    157
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by KidderStreetNoise

  1. A spreadsheet with all this information was sent to media & representatives & to the club to ask if they were concerned, differences as high as 5,222, a 33% difference. Nobody, and I mean nobody cares
  2. Mostly fundraising, a lot of the merch they sold was visual aids to the protest
  3. Sheffield Wednesday had a centralised trust that dealt with raising finances. We had no such setup
  4. Members of the coalition did push for an estimated £5k protest
  5. We've never organised a serious match protest How is giving the owners more money a good solution?
  6. 15 years of this & you still think a win on a Saturday means something, embarrassing
  7. Winning games is irrelevant under this ownership
  8. No, because I'd be alone. That was always the aim, they carried on going to games knowing it was a detriment to the atmosphere. It should be like the 'Boro game at every home game until they're gone. I've explained the effect further up. Why would I name them?
  9. Not in name or branding, but members of the coalition became part of the trust's board, therefore had to be less militant as they were now representing the supporters trust. Trust board members became part of the coalition & they were never going to be as militant because they were a part of the trust that had achieved nothing for years.
  10. But they fused, with coalition members going on to the trust's board & trust members getting involved with the coalition
  11. I couldn't possibly confirm it as it's just my opinion. Pasha is in India having 'critical talks' is what I was told.
  12. The coalitions call for the 3 stooges to stay away was the most attention we’ve ever got on the club since the Steve Kean days, for once, the supporters actually had the momentum & protests were naturally happening without the need for a call to action, then the trust got involved.
  13. Is 15 years unchallenged not enough of a win?
  14. A new owner that can't buy the club because the current owners have got it cosy
  15. I don't think Lancs Police would prosecute 2,000 fans on the pitch forming some protest. Until the fan base show some bottle & come together to do it, it wouldn't be worth the small number that are actually interested in doing something going on the pitch. Yes.
  16. All that does it help their cashflow, anything done in the ground doesn't affect the family, they're thousands of miles away uninterested
  17. Probably because everyone knows the attendances are completely fictional, not a surprise, not going to achieve anything
  18. Not one Reading fan received any form of punishment.
  19. Where’s my idea of a boycott? Get on the pitch & stop games, that’s the only way
  20. Yes they are. Shared with Elliott Jackson & nothing came of it.
  21. How is that the best idea? 20,000 of us paying £30 a ticket, yeah that’ll really show them
  22. The real figures are out there and people still aren’t assed
×
×
  • Create New...