Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

Amo

Members
  • Posts

    18797
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    84

Posts posted by Amo

  1. 1 hour ago, Mercer said:

    It's so sad to see.

    I think it's shocking management all round.

    A perspective - Smallwood off the wage bill 12 months ago (instead of, IMO, Mowbray's sentimentality) would have more than funded a new pitch!

    Scandalous.

    Yeah but that wouldn't have been fair on the poor lad. Have a heart, Mercer.

    • Like 4
  2. 20 minutes ago, Ewood Ace said:

    The loyalty was the 2 year extension on a good wage, which he didn't warrant. Where was Mulgrew's loyalty when he ran his contract down at Aberdeen to sign for Celtic on a free. There wasn't any because by signing for Celtic he progressed his career and it is the same now for Rovers for us to progress we need to move on from Charlie Mulgrew.

    Exactly.

    It's suddenly about "loyalty" when you find yourself on the receiving end. 

  3. 3 minutes ago, unsall said:

    Just think for the first time in a while,and in difficult times, we are actually trying to address the defence,and paying fees,which JH has always said Venkys won’t do.

    Has he said that? I don't want to speak for him but I thought the point was Venky's have never invested much in defenders.

    We've thrown millions away on strikers in the last decade but spent very little on defenders. Dann was probably the last one to command a decent fee, and even that was lower than reported.

    No offence but your posts read like a spokesman from the club's PR team.

    • Like 1
  4. 6 minutes ago, roversfan99 said:

    Yeah he did but it was Coyle who signed him so he played, albeit with a few injuried scattered amongst it, in the relegation season. Not always at centre back either.

    Not that your point is any less valid and ultimately it is our own fault that we are now lumbered with him.

    In my defence, I've tried to blot Coyle's season out of my mind. :lol:

    • Like 2
  5. 10 minutes ago, roversfan99 said:

    He wasnt untested as he played a season in this division for us and got both winners v Newcastle. That being said, its more his age that made it a stupid decision. We gave loads of needless contracts out after promotion.

    I thought he got the new deal on the back of the L1 promotion? Oh well.

  6. 1 hour ago, Miller11 said:

    We’ve done some good deadwood clearing so far and offloading Williams for a fee would be a great bit of business. I can’t see Mulgrew giving up his hefty wage, so I think we will be lumbered with him. 

    Whose bright idea was it to give Mulgrew a 2½ year deal in the first place, seeing as he was untested at Championship level?

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.