Yeah that is true, Gally is working on his fitness and will be pushing for a first team place soon. He is a bit of a lad but he is more shy than big headed.

I've signed up too, get a grip you people on here, what would you have been interested in when fottball was mainly terracing? Fantasy football and Euro 96 has a lot to answer for...

Gally wouldnt go to Burnley don't worry, and I doubt very much he will go anywhere on loan for the forseeable future due to his girlfriend due to give birth very soon.

Yeah they do have 'evidence' but it most of it relates to association. Things like 'you were seen with such a person in the ewood arms' or 'you were walking down livesey branch road in a large group when a group of liverpool risk supporters were at the other end'. A lot of this could be said about any groups of young male rovers supporters, but these lads also happen to wear casual clothing, which immediately alerts the attention of the police.

Paul will shortly become a father for the first time too, don't know why Souey said bad things about his personal life as he has been settled with a girlfriend for a long time now, living with her and is very responsible these days! He is currently just coming back from injury but should hopefully be in the squad tonight.

Ok, my mistake, but the people still contesting these orders have not yet been found guilty so don't condemn them.

Ispy or mcdermott or whatever your name is, how do you know this? I for one know this is DEFINATELY not true, so where have you got your info from? Maybe this whole subject should not have been raised on here, but it begs the question of how a judge will believe someone is not guilty when fellow rovers fans have already condemned them to being nailed to a floor, without seeing a shred of evidence. Ipsy, also how do you know that 10 people were banned last week, this has not been reported in the press to my knowledge. The reason 10 of the 17 were banned last week was they accepted the orders made against them. Some people just didnt have the time and the money to proceed to a trial whereas others just thought it would be easier and there name wouldnt be in the paper anymore. So far noone has been found guilty by a judge the people who are still contesting the FBOs are in court in November for a proper trial with a district judge, in an attempt to clear their now sh*t names. I don't care what southaussy rover thinks or many of the posters on here from various parts of the uk, but when people such as Ipsy are making comments that are not true than i'm pretty sure that is libelous.

So 'knuckle draggers' have stopped you bringing your family to the game? Where do you take them in to the pubs in blackburn (ie postal order) after a match? What a fool we are not in the 80s any more, anyone who claims to have seen trouble at ewood and therefore thought twice about bringing their family is a bit of a loser if you ask me. The only time I have ever seen trouble at ewood is when rovers fans have sold there tickets (so loyal) to away fans who are then sat in home areas. Even then the stewards deal with it quickly. Blackburn is probably THE most family friendly club in the prem and rightly proud of it.

Why should fellow fans of BRFC be nailed to floorboards? You didnt say what questions you would like to be answered either. Bothered what someone in australia actually thinks about things in blackburn anyway...

What questions would you like answered? Would you then be able to make a decision on these people and if they deserve to be banned? Thats very good of you. Tell me, is it ok if I paint my fence this afternoon o great one?

How can any of the people posting on here about supposed hooligans judge them before they have been found guilty by a court? Why would it bother anyone here anyway? Do you think 17 people being given banning orders really gives the club a bad name, when the majority of other clubs have far more fans banned than that? The only reason the club has a bad name with other supporters and media is the lack of atmosphere at home games, the embarrasingly low away support and the fact local 'fans' only realised the town had a football club in 1995. None of the people are being charged with a criminal offence and although im not saying these people are angels, far from it probably, I do believe that the police have to justify there roles at ewood and this is the token result. And in answer to a question raised earlier these banning orders are nothing to do with a fight in the postal order after the man utd game last season, the 'fans' involved in that have been sent to Preston crown court for CRIMINAL offences.