Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

andy82

Members
  • Posts

    301
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by andy82

  1. Why do I need to get on with it? This club has become nothing more than a selling club under the current ownership. The academy supposed to be used for creating top stars who would feature in the Rovers squad for years to come has seen one of our best ever talents sold onto the current champions. The Walkers did nothing to persuade him to stay. Didn't one of the Walkers say they liked Chelsea? Someone on this board said they spoke with one of Jack's sons and he said that. Hmmm.

    Our manager could do well and then someone from the top 4 would just come in for him. Yet I'm supposed to just "get on with it" and keep paying my season ticket money. People wonder why attendances are falling? Well because they don't want to support a no win situation which is was the current state of this club is. It's a no win situation and I'm tired of supporting it although I will. The lingering hope that the Walkers might sell one day is the only thing that is keeping my interest.

    Thank god for last night. I thought the season was going from bad to worse but thanks to that magnificent comeback we could have something to look forward to other than languishing in midtable this season.

    364283[/snapback]

    Now i may be one of the minority that doesnt mind your constant posts on this matter, but if you think the Walkers donating all their money would lead us to the top 4 for a prolonged period of time your taking the mickey. More investment may be necessary to hold onto our position as top town club in the future, something i think is a much more achievable goal. If you think some mega rich businessmans sees a pot of gold in a small northern town club your completely deluded - we simply can't compete with big city attractions.

  2. I was going to reply at the time that this is quite an idealistic view of the situation. Regardless of how accurate andy's post is, there's little reason to believe Keane wouldn't play for another Premiership club.

    363821[/snapback]

    my post is very accurate!

    what i am not sure of is whether he left after telling them to shove it or accepting a position, hence the careful wording! And Ladbrokes arent taking any more bets on it according to my mate that has just finished his shift at William Hill. Skybet closed it but have reopened it now at 1/2. Read into that what you will - i'd just say i think an announcement will be made soon. Im not putting my money anywhere mind!

  3. I am getting confused now. Didn't Dunn and Duff get fed and housed, have training pitches, trainers, medics etc etc under "the old scouting network"? Weren't they signed by Rovers at 16 or younger? Didn't we run age group football teams (remember Rovers A and Rovers B in the old Lancashire Leagues)?

    361761[/snapback]

    I remember them signing, season after the Premiershiop win. Work it out from that!

  4. I'm not sure where you have got that from, I can't recall the last time we went out to an 'inferior' side.  Admittedly my memory only stretches back to '96, but since then it's been Germany, Argentina, Brazil and Portugal.  I can't remember a lot about 2000, did we go out in the group stage?  I guess that's the worst.

    Still, come major tournaments, we always seem to avoid potential banana skins.

    360755[/snapback]

    Portugal is actually one of the sides i thought of as an English underestimation, but other than that havent you had quite a few 'difficult' games in the first two matchs of those competitions, leaving a lot of catching up work?

  5. If you look at the friendlies that have all included two teams from England, Holland, Germany, France and Argentina in the past year or two i would say England come out as having performed the best. Englands problem will be, as ever in major tournaments, against teams they underestimate. They are lucky the greeks, danes and norweigens are not there. Germany have to rely on the extra boost of home support and Jurgens jungs (Mertesacker, Huth, Schweinsteiger, Podolski, Deisler) coming good as he has promised. We were the better side against France though, although Trezugeut should have beaten Lehmann (also known as liabilitymann)

    Both the french and dutch teams seem to be full of amazing talent but show little in the way of end results. The dutch have some wonderful players in their squad (just who do you play up front???) and i can't understand whats going wrong - although they have had a sven-like approach to some recent friendlies.

    I havent seen much of the italians, although they did look good in the highlights against the dutch, better than England or Germany did anyway (although Robben, who was the only reason they got the draw against Germany, didnt play against Italy, neither did horseface), again i havent seen much of the spaniards.

    oh, and philip, i certainly wont be hoping for that draw in the last 16!

  6. Exactly. It is printed on the back of most match tickets.

    E.G.

    "This is a home supporters area ticket. Refunds will not be given to away supporters refused admission or ejected"

    360247[/snapback]

    Unless your wearing the away clubs shirt you can always use the power of denial though. Has worked for me many times!

  7. It need to be Hargreaves. The lad is playing regularly for a team who have one of the best set of midfield options in the world. So far his England career has been a joke - brought on by Sven with ten minutes left and needing a goal.

    358986[/snapback]

    Hes not playing that regularly due to injury, but your damn right about the Bayern midfield- better than even chelsea have got.

  8. also:

    "Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink robbed Ferdinand for the second goal... I have seen that happen to Rio before. It is poor defending2

    Analysing the first goal United condeded against Middlesbrough, when Edwin Van der Sar let slip a 30-yard shot... "He should have saved that. That was saveable"

    "The players have been asked questions and they are just not coming up with the answers.

    "I am sick of having to say it and they are sick of listening to me."

    "These guys thought getting new contracts was the best day of their careers."

    "They think they have made it. They haven't."

    On the penalty Richardson gave away.... "He is a lazy defender who deserved to get punished.. he wasn't doing his job"

  9. a lot play football, most of my college mates that are asian, are good at football, better than me even, and thats good wink.gif

    but none of them play for teams

    357479[/snapback]

    Ive noticed that a lot more play five a side which as a lanky centre half (much like Carlton Palmers style im told) i have a lot of difficulty with (the head hight rule kills me at 6,4!), but the asian kids all seem to be very small, fast and tricky.

    Im going to raise the name Ali Karimi again. If anyone can help with a middle eastern presence on the pitch, hes the man.

  10. Yorkshire Derby this season - Leeds, population 500k v Sheffield, population 500k.

    Leeds 1 Sheff Utd 1

    Crowd 23,000

    Lancashire Derby last season - Blackburn, population 105k v Burnley, pop. 90k

    Rovers 2 Burnley 1

    Crowd 29,000

    ENOUGH SAID!! tinykit.gif

    356306[/snapback]

    Population of leeds is bigger than that as well. dry.gif

    Just had an argument with a leeds fan today about how passionate rovers supporters are/arent. Reminded him that our attendance didnt drop 15k and the local rugby leauges teams gate raise by 7k when we were relegated!

  11. Some very interesting points raised here from a marketing perspective, its often the little things that count. The TV gantry idea is wonderful, I believe that would raise or stature amongst supporters of other clubs or those just beginning to gain an interest in football. I think one of the london clubs moved theirs for a season once when they were building so as not to show the ground up in front of the cameras.

    The draping of flags over empty areas is standard in Germany, especially ten years ago when a lot of the (older, many now demolished/updated) groundswere only half full, and some of the traditionally bigger clubs had been relegated.

    Very poor concourses-Old Trafford

    Very Very Good Concourse-JJB Stadium.

    Needs demolishing Concourse-Goodison Park.

    356255[/snapback]

    Elland Rd has probably the best and worst concourses i've seen premiership football at - The family stand is magnificent, the away corner is like a concrete car park stairwell.

  12. The first paragraph is irrelevant if we're considering the legalisation of all drugs - nobody is disputing that there are differing levels of harmful substances .

        The second paragraph (edited) is just plain ridiculous . What would you prefer your kids to take on a night out , a few cigs and a couple of pints of bitter , or heroin and crack - however they are packaged and put into the body ? Making something socially acceptable doen't make it safe - hence your point about alcohol.

        Your third paragraph is just plain naive , youthful wishful thinking . Hard drugs are hard drugs however they are packaged and ingested . If they're not having the desired effect then the "consumer" will find some that are - that's what they want FFS . If the Gov't water the package down (call it making drugs purer or safer , whatever ...) they'll turn back to illegal supplies .

        As for your point that too much of the present gear is "sub-standard" - full of brick dust as you put it - well , that's not in the pushers interests (even they have to adhere to market principles and keep the customer satisfied ) The implication also there is that somehow if the Gov't gets involved the consumer will be able to take hard drugs , get a sufficient kick out of it as they do at present , but yet suffer no serious long or short term damage . Naive to the point of stupidity ....

      There may be an argument to make soft drugs more readily available but no sensible adult who gives a damn for impressionable kids should extend that to the hard stuff simply because the government hasn't the resolve or guts to tackle the present problem .  Kids should be educated and protected not have their own Gov't collude into making them drug induced wasters. What next - a bill to encourage binge drinking ...... unsure.gif

    354634[/snapback]

    How am i being naive to the point of stupidity? The problem is that all the 'won't somebody think of the children' brigade like yourself will not listen to anyone who has experience in the matter. The fact is, no-one wants to jack up in a dodgy back alley next to some old bins, no matter who or what they are.

    Personally as someone that uses drugs the ideal route would be decriminalisation. Drugs would then be more readily available, and at their cheapest.

    As mentioned, alcohol is not safe. Would i prefer my kids to be out drinking and smoking or taking drugs? I know the last place i would want to see them is falling out of a 'fun pub' at midnight after 15 pints of stella - and wheras i don't have any mates that do this sorta thing, i do know a few that blaze crack now and again, with no obvious addiction or side effects.

    Do you know how much nutmeg it takes to kill someone, btw? You would be shocked - and you keep that in a cupboard your kids can get to....

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.