I'll make my own mind up as I watch them play . Why all this would come out on the eve of the season makes me more than sceptical. Someone on here, when he came in, said Ismael had a watching brief for the rest of the season. It struck a chord as someone who knew what he was on about. Let's see how they go.

Cantwell actually surprised me with his work rate, particularly the longer the season went on. No complaints from me in that department.

Selling Britain when he wouldn't sign is very much evidence. We'll see if there's any more evidence over the next few weeks.

Can shoot off eider foot,can he play on the wing ?

He did the same at Stanley, whipped a couple of good corners and a free kick in. Said at the time , looks like he's going to be on set pieces.

It is/has been a problem, I've been saying for a few weeks that things do seem different to the last few years, but it's the proof of the pudding and all that. Hopefully we see a change for the better.

It is sometimes the right thing to do obviously, but as it is now with all the power being with the players it can be a complicated situation .

Nothing has changed, but we've to go back to Armstrong for a comparison. Ismael said he wanted to keep Britain but the club sold him when it was obvious that he wasn't going to sign, I'd say that was the correct thing to do. As far as the others go, let's see what happens, each one is an individual case. An "inability" to resign them may be an unwillingness, especially with the midfield reinforcements. The player himself may not actually want to sign. If Tronstad, Travis or Hyam resign or are sold before their contracts expire, on top of the Britain sale, would that then suggest to you that things may just be changing?

Nothing has changed ? When was the last time we sold someone in the last year of his contract who wouldn't sign for £3 million ?

It's been going on ages, which is what I think Ismael was suggesting. The Britain sale bucked the trend, as does the length of contracts for the new arrivals. We also have a new head coach, why would he want to renew the contract of a player he doesn't want ?

It depends on the reasons why they're not signing.

I don't so much mind anyone not signing, that's their prerogative. Obviously, the key is a, getting money for them. b, replacing them with a good/better. With receiving good money for Britain and signing new players on longer contracts, maybe, just maybe the new broom is getting busy.

That works both ways

Miller has to play, if there's one team I'd love to beat off a long throw...

Said a couple of weeks ago, for owners who don't care about the fans, they don't half go a long way to make us feel better. Must be the most baffling and most used contradiction on here.