Sounds like we have been very lucky pre-season. Both Todd and Savage have walked a stupid tightrope by all accounts. We'd better get signing recruits quick to cover for the inevitable suspensions. If we come bottom of the Fair Play list three years running, I think we run the risk of starting next season with a points deduction don't we?

As I've pointed out elsewhere, the Rovers are not alone in the Premiership having an Academy at least 50% non-English. The big issue is training of young teens which renders non-English recruits much better than the locals. Trevor Brooking has made a stand about this and been frozen out by the primordial FA who are making the building of the new Wembley a 5 minute job compared with their implementation of the Burns Report.

Not my list, yet- so wait a bit longer to know how the Premiership will NOT finish up but The Observer's stab. This is a club by club guide. Transfer spending to date makes interesting reading. Excluding the clubs which have spent net >£10m, £54.7m net has been spent by 18 clubs on transfer fees. Chelsea have spent "only" £28.2m net (a lot of incoming transfer fees) and Everton have spent £13.6m net. The clubs spending more than £5m net are an eclectic bunch: Arsenal, Mancs, Liverpool, Fulham, Sheff Utd, Wigan, West Ham. Three clubs have made a gain on transfer activity this summer: Rovers (and that is with Roberts' fee over-stated!), Bolton and Boro (could be significant in relation to their prospects). Money bags 'Arry has managed to burn through £350K so far! No wonder he wasn't appointed at Chelsea. The Pompey fan rates "half" the Rovers team as hate figures (what?). Good reason as any for us taking three points next Saturday.

Venables brought back = sick joke Phil Neville brought back = vomit McLaren = totally unconvincing actor Beckham dropping = smart move Not offering Beckham encouragement to win his place back = dumb move. It isn't as though Beckham has a strong personality. England's future = grim. This season, perhaps 40 England-qualified professionals will command regular starting places in the top leagues of Europe (and that includes Micky Gray and Andy Todd). No way can we win anything from such a tiny base to select from.

Dunn has been very poor in their games so far and has fallen out with Bruce as well. Seems that the lad's heart is elsewhere.

The Football League attendances have been interesting. Very good on the whole with increases in the majority of grounds but the two live games last night and today are probably at least 5,000 down on what they would be if they were not televised. If televised games are going to be down in geberal the Prem will suffer. As for the Blackburn debate, clearly there are many people making a lifestyle decision to opt for a few more pints over watching the Rovers. Add to that the cost and utter misery/inconvenience of long distance travel, more remote supporters are less inclined to bother as well.

Bayern call for Juve expulsion from the G14. On this occasion, Ruminiegge has got it absolutely right. Juve have just posted a E26m loss for the last quarter- mostly selling players for prices below their depreciated book value. The TV hits etc have yet to bite. Milan have had the audacity to challenge the 8 point deduction for the coming season in the Courts!

I think the woes about the defense are hopefully misplaced. We've got the same personnel as last season. Pre-season, Hughes has played Todd and Zura sparingly and given the Axe, McEveley and Matteo good runs at the back which they have failed to impress with. If all goes well in the transfer market, those three will find at least six players ahead of them during the season proper. I know we went from having the tightest defence around in the second half of 04/5 to averagely tight 05/6 but why should it fall apart 06/7? Agreed we need to get Ooijers in and keep Neill motivated and at Ewood with a fully fit Admiral at the top of the wish list. Gray does worry me though.

Rovers 1-0

Agreed. The Germans rave about him. But he's had his ankle operated on, is inplaster until September and January is a realistic target for him reaching match fitness.

Simple answer den- we shouldn't unless as a last resort. There is zero indication that Rovers want to or intend to sell Nelsen- I think this is a plain fact. Everything else is a pretty interesting debate. As for Huth needing more games- true. He'll look great turning out away at Pompey in a plaster cast! He'll be as quick as Sol Campbell at the other end. With regards to RB's questioning Hughes' definition of a good close season- we have shed four £1m+ earners from the wage bill, signed two new £1m+ earners and a 25 year old former England international on a 2 year pay for performance contract and are closing in on a second highly accomplished experienced CL performer in Ooijer. All this and whatever wadge Sparky was given to spend on transfers (which the Trustees were reported as being generous with) remains unspent and he still has the option of up to four loan deals unused. Plus Gamst and Reid are secured on long term deals and we have better cover for Brad. This is hard fact- not speculation so I can understand Sparky feeling OK- as he has said himself, he can go into the first game of the season now without being forced to sign anyone but he is still out there looking for deals. RB is clearly seriously worried we are going lose Nelsen and Neill (especially Neill who is a long term favourite of his). Whereas Sparky knows what is in the Rovers' wages piggy bank and how the transfer market is shaping. Hughes hasn't BSed the fans so far so it is safe to assume he is feeling pretty confident Rovers are going to keep Nelsen and Neill or at worse get "silly" money for one or both of them and has his bases covered if that happens. In the meantime, he's winding up the price for Emo who can go if the boost to the transfer kitty is big enough. If my guess is right then yes, its a good transfer window so far.

3rd pillar; pre- the Stevens Inquiry: yes. Now, why do you think the transfer market is so sticky? It isn't being greased. Two major problems with Shillito's analysis: - injury prone as applied to Nelsen? I think not- his first game was 15 january 2005 since when he has started 56 games (none coming on from the subs' bench) and has been subbed just 3 times including once when he tried to play on with a broken leg. Huth, on the other hand, won't be kicking a ball before January. - Clubs look at their finances as a whole but players (including their depreciation accounts) individually. On the basis there is no way we could recruit a replacement as good as the Admiral (we'd be elbowed out by CL clubs if any became available) and the buying club are a direct competitor, Pompey are going to have to pay way over the odds to get Rovers interested. Going up in £300K intervals every week means they will get in range when the January transfer window comes round. Apart from that, den is pretty well spot on. I can only think of the sale of Bailey and purchase of McKenzie where the club strengthened playing-wise by use of the star player proceeds. Arsenal ARE different; they can click their fingers and usually players come running. Hughes "Blackburn are sexy now" the other night is working towards correcting the perception of the club so that players might come if we click our fingers and whistle for them.

Any TV or web coverage of the Sparta game?

Allemania Aachen reached the final of the German Cup and so like Millwall, entered the UEFA Cup as a 2nd Division team. Unlike Millwall, they acquitted themselves well in Europe. As it happens, Aachen played AZ Alkmar in the last 32 of the UEFA Cup. All clear now?

That's not difficult- just forwards anything written by jim mk 2!

Scotty, those three points are extremely encouraging for the forthcoming campaign and have really raised my spirits. Aachen did well in the UEFA Cup last season (qualified from their Group stage) so it was a decent challenge for Rovers. Good luck and keep safe in Rottedam!

He clearly sees him as a squad player capable of doing a job. Hughes is signalling loyalty to those players who do a job for him. He is making it that bit harder for others to walk out.

The poll that matters is the c. 10,000 that turn up for £10 tickets at League Cup games. There is no indication that reduced prices increases attendance and hasn't been for at least five years sadly.

I am glad that there are a number of posters reflecting the sad reality of the situation. Rovers have to price to optimise revenue. It does make complete sense to price the two ends identically knowing that visiting supporters are marginally less price sensitive having travelled (and in the case of Chelsea, are used to paying £50+ every home game) and that most of the Blackburn End is occupied by season ticket holders paying appreciably less. The only criticism would be that perhaps the lower priced areas of the Riverside and JW should perhapsbe larger and price-reduced to be genuinely attractive to the hard-up walk on fan. These are the Chelsea prices taken from thed official site. Incidentally, having to register to obtain details of the price of tickets is a major web site boo boo. I desperately hope that the Premiership Chairmen sit down and seriously appraise what they are going to do with the massive unexpected bonus next year's 60%+ rise in TV income. My agenda would be: 1) A decent shift of allocation towards the non-CL qualifying clubs. The league within a league is steadily eroding the attractiveness of the product. This is under discussion. 2) An across the board reduction in gate prices of 25%. The fans going through the turnstiles have got to be rewarded otherwise the TV product will be eroded- it is simple self-interest on the part of the Premiership to do this. I remember when Jack was alive, there was a vision of entry to Ewood eventually being close to free because theclub would be making so much from RoverVision etc etc. Unfortunately, I am not aware that this is on the Premiership agenda. At the end of the day, we all make personal choices. It is very clear that many people on this MB regularly drink more alcohol in an afternoon than I get through in a fortnight or a month. Many people smoke- another rather expensive activity. Perhaps some of these are the people complaining about the price of tickets to Rovers?

http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,3758410a1823,00.html NZ manager discussing Nelsen playing for them. More importantly, Nelsen talking about fighting to get his place back at Rovers to face Pompey at Fratton.

"I think he'd do better to keep his mouth shut," Heskey on Sullivan according to the News of the Screws.

Just hope we don't suffer any injuries in this one (or against Sparta and that goes for our supporters as well). Plenty of clubs seem to be getting bad hits to key players. We're playing an outfit that would be at its level against Accy Stanley from Colin's description irrespective of their 1-1 at the Valley. That sounds like desperate tackling from our visitors.... Would be a nice bonus if Benni were to get the Rovers' faithful enthused. Report on Charlton v NZ, Nelsen's injury and NZ ARE going to ask for him to play for them at Ewood. Incidentally, JW has said Rovers are looking to make sure Nelsen is not disadvantaged in his wages by us turning down Pompey. So' Arry has bumped up our wages bill and still not signed anybody permanently except David Thompson.

What a surprise, Villa have enquired about Neil Lennon and Stilan Petrov.

Wooo! The gap is closing. The MB will be welcoming longsider and all his little chums any second now.

Jordan confusing the Axe and Agathe by all accounts! The Axe started at centre half. Aachen's previous game was a 1-1 draw away at PSV. First goal apparently a Benni volley from an MGP cross. Second, Benni muscled his way thru' to lay the ball off for Roberts to chip the keeper. Aachen's first was a 25 yard blast from Rosli. All from the Allemani Aachen thread on the official web site's Rovers massageboard!