Jump to content

Bbrovers2288

Members
  • Posts

    3448
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by Bbrovers2288

  1. I speak to a lot of poles with my work, I would disagree with fluent, broken seems to be the most atypical. Certainly would struggle with mowbrays tones and vocabulary
  2. Don’t think it’s a completely different style though, just more quality in champ than league one. Polish football- champ isn’t as compatible in my opinion never mind a language barrier to overcome. Don’t imaging Tony being easy to understand to a foreign ear. if I was to exercise caution it would be in the summer Newcastle had a choice of joelinton or Danny ings, massive difference in price but they thought they were buying better due to foreign stats and reputation abroad. I know who they would prefer now.
  3. Certainly not against broadening our transfer search and the foreign market. I really like Curtis though, think he will be a prem player
  4. Not doubting your knowledge or fact he looks good, just not sure he would fit into the mowbray way or championship. Plenty of good foreign players move to England and their talents don’t suit, we have had a few at Ewood. Just a personal choice but I’d be happier to see the league 1 lads step up that the unknown of a polish lad. Could be eating my words in a few months granted. Let’s hope so
  5. Tbh I don’t know this lad but if the fee is 3, I’d still rather go for Curtis or Maddison , more likely to improve our sids imo just through knowing the leagues
  6. Not from any reliable source Iv seen but then rich has just produced a new name on me
  7. Heard a name, not taking it as gospel however so not willing to put it out there. It’s decent, not brilliant but will improve our wing
  8. Out of favour champ keeper of decent pedigree and a European first teamer not in highest division is as good as I can give u. signing, not a clue
  9. Meh , the Sunderland keeper ain’t for me , in so much as he doesn’t excite me but I’d support him if he moved here. Think there is a few other keepers being looked at, he is 1/3 I’m led to believe
  10. Terrific result, done me out of a ton on my coupon hit il take that hit every week for that result. also pleased with gallagher, one of the few who has stood up for him. Think there is more to come , def a player there just hasn’t showed it yet
  11. Can’t say I saw any of him in a rovers shirt, picked up a few of when he was out on loan. Unnecessary signings seems to be a mowbray trait
  12. Sam hart out of contract in the summer? We might have well just let him go, perennial loanee , waste of time. Either give him a chance or move him on. Signing somebody and then loaning him out his entire contract is madness. Throwing wages away
  13. Agreed , but don’t think there is much in it
  14. I’m in agreement with mani, liked Rhodes when he was here but could see limitations with regards to pace, hold up, chances created for fellow players, he was by all intent and purposes a finisher in the box. In Scotland where I live there is a player kris boyd, scores by the barrel load, but put him in England and he is woeful because the rest of his game isn’t there. min right environment he is useful, not our one currently
  15. Yea but he can find a new club off his own back, we aren’t demanding a fee , free to move if he does , if not he will be a sub here until the summer an agreement will be reached then , probably with him giving a final few years to Scotland. His preference is abroad however as they can match his wages
  16. Basically been told the same at Wigan as here, didn’t see point of sticking it out to be in same boat in the summer, came back to pursue a final payday for a couple of seasons abroad in order to settle family. Not that hard to understand
  17. It’s tighter granted but there is always folk that will throw a bit of info out
  18. Yea which would be great if we had wingers whipping balls in or attacking mids unlocking defences and creating a lot of chances. Play the way we are , and have done since mowbray arrived, pumping long balls/ set pieces/ breakaway goals and we don’t play to Rhodes strengths at all. Even when he was here first time round he had more quality to provide for him. It’s also a no goer, think we should put this to bed. Celtic would be great for him, comes alive in the box for a dominant team , good finisher from pen box in
  19. Don’t get the Rhodes desire personally and Iv heard nothing to suggest we are even interested. Unicorn journalism is my betting, think he can stop being mentioned now
  20. Rhodes- no. We don’t create. Luxury player which we don’t have foundations for mulgrew- mls or oz although does still have a house in Kirkintilloch but I can’t see him matching money in Scotland
  21. I’m sure this has a deep meaning but it’s over my head mate haha. unkess it’s an actual player, I don’t know him
  22. Haven’t heard , think chaddy was on this one. Not one my source has knowledge of to be honest
  23. A foreign left back- possibly French, most certainly unheard of was in to discuss a loan Monday. I don’t have a name sadly
×
×
  • Create New...