Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

DeeCee

Members
  • Posts

    3877
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by DeeCee

  1. 8 hours ago, windymiller7 said:

    I used to work for a consultancy firm owned by Gary Neville around 2008/9 (King Associates) and it was around the time that the house was being completed. I've actually been to the house a few times. Whether Venkys still own it or anyone else does/resides there, I've no idea.

    What I do know is, it's at Top of Th Knotts in Bolton and definitely did not have gold taps! 😆

    GNH.jpg.f672a287a082b78c1923b3409c745ccc.jpg

    The building at the top of the photo also forms part of the estate. This is, what was, the housekeeper's cottage - Gary & Emma lived in this whilst the main house was being completed.

    Don't you mean Gaz and Emz?

    • Like 1
  2. On 11/10/2023 at 15:38, bluebruce said:

    Whilst I generally agree with your reasoning, and that we should be able to (and are able to) freely discuss pros and cons of a player as soon as we have seen them, and to an extent before we have seen them, the 'some reason' you allude to is that there's an assumption that a player will take time to bed in. New club, new teammates, new manager, new area, new tactics, often a new league or even new country. It's natural to assume a player will take time to settle in and adapt to all of this, and there is a fair bit of apparent precedent for it.

    So if the player struggles, it's easy enough to think it may be down to those factors, and it may be. If a player hits the ground running, it's easy to assume those factors haven't made much difference, or that he's just that good that he's playing well in spite of them, and can only get better or at least is less likely to tail off as any natural change in form may be offset by having settled in. There's logic in this too, although there is certainly precedent of players who have set off on fire at a club and tailed off, perhaps due to adrenaline and hunger when they arrive, starting as an unknown quantity for opposition, or sheer dumb luck.

    There's a lot of psychology at play, and I think this is another reason some supporters tend towards saying give them time. It's only a messageboard, and I maintain we can say what we want on here, but if players get a sniff the wider fanbase is criticising them, when they're new, confidence can spiral. So I can see where people are coming from when they say these things. Attempting to shut down debate is something I'm not in favour of though. But I do think people should steer away from comments like 'he's clearly a waste of money' or 'he's shit' or 'he'll never make it here' when it's just been a few games, or even a couple of months really. Comments like 'so far he isn't looking like he'll contribute enough to warrant the fee' however, are totally fair. The problem for me comes from posters who attempt to shut down both types of remarks and don't do balance.

    Message boards are all about opinions, good or bad, posts - good or bad are essential to keep them current and vibrant, ergo encouraging debate.

    Professional players nowadays surely are coached about how negative "press" affects them and how to deal with it? 

    Football psychology has been going on for some while.

  3. 21 hours ago, roverandout said:

    Just in case anyone is interested my mum has cancer. 3 weeks after losing my dad

    Stay strong mate, in my (very) recent experiences with the NHS as a cancer patient, they are extremely good.  Support staff, nurses, doctors and consultants.

    There are some really good treatments available now.

    Macmillan Cancer charity are amazing too 💯 check out their on line stuff, tremendously helpful and informative.

    Best wishes, cancer doesn't just effect the patient. Think positive 👍

    • Like 2
  4. On 28/09/2023 at 14:45, DeeCee said:

    I've forwarded my undelivered email to Lyndsey Talbot.

    I got a reply........  

     

    Despite some of your personal comments aimed at Mr Waggott, and the fact that your email has not been received due to technical issues that have been publicly broadcast, we now wish to respond with some of the facts behind the decision of closing down not only the Blackburn End but also the Riverside for the second time this season.

     

    There are a number of factors to consider when creating the operational plan for a matchday and the decisions made are based on these. Initially we review what the anticipated attendance is going to be and then measure this against the financial cost of opening the entire stadium.

     

    For the first round of the Carabao Cup; BRFC V Walsall, we attracted an attendance of just over 6,000 supporters. For this fixture the capacity for the Blackburn End was less than 50% capacity of the lower tier. Due to the make-up of the stadium, once the decision is made to open a stand, the staffing of that area remains the same whether the stand is at capacity or accommodating fewer than 500 supporters. 

     

    For the Cardiff game, we anticipated an attendance of circa 4000-5000 which is just over a third of the capacity for the Jack Walker Stand and less than one sixth of the whole stadium and therefore the Jack Walker stand would adequately cater for the expected demand. 

     

    We do appreciate that many of our long-standing supporters sit in the Blackburn End and would argue that this stand is affectionately referred to as the home end, but the Jack Walker Stand can be relied upon to accommodate all supporters with ease. This provides a better backdrop for the broadcast footage based on top of the Riverside Stand and ultimately it will help us to manage costs at a time when all costs have to be carefully considered under Financial Fair Play rules. 

     

    I’m sure you can appreciate and understand why the Club has taken the relevant measures on this occasion. Of course, these decisions will be reviewed on a match-by-match basis should we progress further in the competition, as we hope to do.

     

     

     

    Thanking you for your continued support.

     

     

    Kind regards

     

    Christina Haines

    On behalf of Steve Waggott

     

    And sent this one back

     

    Thank you for your reply.

    Does Mr Waggot realise that his decision took perhaps 2,000 supporters off the attendance figure, plus their spend in the shop/concourses, reduced the already declining atmosphere and must have de motivated the players, having to play in a ground that was empty on three sides - less the 300 travelling fans!
    Surely it would have been better to house thse fans in the end of the JW stand and open the BBE for home supporters, most of who were there before Steve Waggots arrival and will be there long after his departure?
    That is of course, if the club still exists after the perennial cost cutting that he is implementing for this once great club.
    Regards,
     
    Wonder if I'll get a reply to this one ? 😁
    • Like 5
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.