Jump to content

Emerald Isle Rover

Members
  • Posts

    1937
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by Emerald Isle Rover

  1. The price is dictated by age contract status experience in current league or other leagues
  2. What part of he wanted to play premier league do you not understand? It’s really not that difficult
  3. What’s relevant though is his age and contract length and whether you agree or disagree what they paid for him comes into consideration hence the buyout clause
  4. Holidays are near over thankfully and the kids can go to bed early for school in the mornings because your takes are quite frankly absurd and can only be from a kid who knows very very little about football
  5. Your missing the most important bit of Information he has asked the club if a prem team comes in for him for the club to not stand in his way. When that happens then the power turns to the player and to add to that we owe him our very championship status as of today. He deserves the chance
  6. Well it actually is very relevant brighton I’d argue have one of if not the best recruitment department in England and they are willing to pay 40million speaks volumes bougnt for 30 had a fantastic season 22 years old 4 years left on contract - but yet we all still compare
  7. Please explain how I’m intrigued to hear this?
  8. I’d guess 9 up front plus add ons - merely guessing based on reports of what the ‘nearly fee’ was
  9. Sad to see him go but cannot deny he deserves a crack in the prem so he goes with my best wishes. Also glad it hasn’t dragged out to deadline day lets see how we fare come the next fortnight
  10. I personally thought it was because he missed a very good chance for his hat trick minutes prior
  11. Could easily come in for him id be against selling him to a championship team unless the bid is close to 20million
  12. But realistically in terms of who we are competing with/against who is splashing millions? Without selling a star player (excluding the relegated teams) not many
  13. Agree in terms of efl players but that is it. Prem money and high end champ league teams money is an absolute disgrace
  14. And our judgement is sound on this one 9/10million and Ipswich can have him good luck. Until that valuation is met he’s a rovers player
  15. What if Plymouth derby Oxford Portsmouth all get injuries - I’m not disagreeing that we need more bodies that’s 100% a given and I’d be wincing watching us with little to no cover if that was the case. But we will get bodies in whether it be loan deals or not. I still think there are 4/5 times with similar/smaller squad size untested at this level would be in a worse off position than ourselves just my opinion of course
  16. Yes incomings I agree but this is a sale completely different
  17. But again every team has a 46 + game schedule in the championship. All clubs will have injuries and suspensions. I agree we need bodies in to help progress but I stand by what Iv said I think there is and will be worse off teams than ourselves this season
  18. What exit deals have we messed up? Incomings we have been a shambles but we seem pretty good at letting players go so I don’t really see your point with that one? but really as a rovers fan what does it matter at present we have a player who has contributed 3 goals and an assist in what 90 odd mins of football. You are just creating a narrative to be negative when there’s a million other reasons you can do that and be justified - this isn’t one of them
  19. Iv agreed with that, what I didt agree with was we would be ‘clear favourites’ for relegation
  20. Sorry but a ‘good sportsman’ wouldn’t come into it if your employer deceived you. If I was a good worker and my employer back tracked on any agreement we had before I’d be furious. The reality is we don’t know and a lot on here seem to just jump on some unverified Ipswich sources the same sources that said Sammie was there for a medical Clarke was signing and hamer had agreed a fee. Then to read that their sources were spreading false information same can apply here ipswich offered a pathetic 6 million and upped it to 8 million that’s all been confirmed and our figure was always higher than that certainly not the 20million quoted in media but 10 plus add ons
  21. If that was the case I’d bet that szmodics would have done a Rowe if he’s felt deceived in any way everything doesn’t have to be a conspiracy or a rovers fault (even though we have history) it for me is simple - Ipswich have not met the clubs valuation
  22. Of the window closed now and we still have szmodics I’d be more than confident we would be better than 3 other teams - we action here like rovers are the only team that gets injuries and suspensions etc - we most definitely need more bodies to improve no doubt about it but I think there are worse off teams in the division this year than rovers
  23. You’ve just proved my point a very poor derby side and equally bad if not worse Plymouth side in the division. So can’t imagine how we would be clear favourites to go down
×
×
  • Create New...