47er

12 hours ago, Wegerleswiggle said:

Toth

Alebiosu Miller Mcloughlin Cashin

Tronstad 

Baradji Cantwell 

Jorgensen Gudjohnsen Cleary

Subs

Pears

Carter

O'Riordan 

Pickering

Forshaw

Montgomery 

TGH

Moroshita

Ohashi

 

Isn't a bad squad

 

 

Well we have it and we're not doing very well. You can cite injuries but we shouldn't be averaging more than any other club.

And we haven't got Cleary yet.

1 hour ago, rovers11 said:

We're doomed. Clubs around us picking up points and we have 2 home wins all season. And there's no way we're sacking VI. 

Genuinely think we have to start preparing for lge 1. And it's fully deserved sadly.

Fans have to mentally prepare for it, but the Club will do nothing other than slashing costs. Means nothing to them

17 hours ago, Goozburger said:

The only approach you appear to want me to have is to have the same opinion as you, otherwise you'll force through some odd interpretation that I'm blaming boycotters for division in the support base. For the third or fourth time, I've done no such thing, and you are clutching at straws to convince me otherwise.

I've aired my opinions. Nobody has to agree with them. I'm not going to take your opinions and twist them into something totally false to demean your stance. So don't do the same to me.

I think the accusation is that you behave differently on another forum than on here. Its several hours since SuperBrfc raised it and you haven't responded to that charge.

23 hours ago, roversfan99 said:

People on both sides trying to provoke arguments, take the moral high ground and increase their own social media profiles.

Yea, you expect people to have differing views and to express them strongly at times but you don't expect your fellow supporters to be so mean and personal about it.

3 hours ago, Rogerb said:

1.1 point per game extrapolated over a 46 game season is 50.6

3 points from the last 6 games! Just saying....

10 hours ago, Tricky said:

Sounds like depression and anger 

So basically the same as those that oppose it 

No ones defended the owners?

Sickening... really?

I'm comfortable with putting up with it. Depends how you feel and what you manifest?

You're trolling I think.

59 minutes ago, Tricky said:

2 hours ago, 47er said:

Apart from anything else, the pride they get from knowing they did the right thing.

So basically the same as those that oppose it 

The pride from turning up as usual at Ewood equates to the pride from participating in an almost unheard of boycott of the club? Especially when many boycotters were season ticket holders and had already paid for their ticket?

I really don't think so!

Any way, my gripe with you is not about whether the boycott succeeded or not, its that you positively wanted it to fail.

2 hours ago, M_B said:

Improvement in performance will, in the end, bring improvement in results. We're still in January. 

How many January games left? It'll be Easter in no time!

2 hours ago, Tricky said:

What has a season ticket holder gained from not going?

Apart from anything else, the pride they get from knowing they did the right thing.

5 hours ago, roverandout said:

Attendance 11 thousand. Doesn't look like a boycott 

It never does!

Transfer windows now mean little to me now. Its as if its an exercise that other clubs take part in to improve their prospects but one we're not really bothered about.

We seem to come alive about 15 minutes before it closes having had months to plan it.

5 hours ago, JHRover said:

One interesting snippet from that article was that Sohail apparently sat a football management course in Manchester within the last year or two.

If that is true then it demonstrates what we are dealing with here. Both he and Rudy learning on the job, zero experience or background and we are paying the price for it, all with the approval of our wonderful benefactors in India. 

Or rather "not learning on the job"!!

17 minutes ago, RoversTilliDie said:

Getting Blackburn Rovers back on track, and change at Ewood.

That quote is from Jim not me. I understand because I'm always doing it!

18 minutes ago, jim mk2 said:

Can I ask what the protesters are hoping to achieve by staying away from the Watford game?

Trying to pressure Venkys to sell. 

4 minutes ago, RevidgeBlue said:

From memory Three thousand and odd for a League game.

Night game in Div 3?

14 minutes ago, speedies gonna get ya. said:

The banners are made by a fan who is not part of Coalition working group. I am very grateful that he is being proactive and getting the message out by any means. It is not a GCSE art exam after all. Wish more people would to the same. 

Same. They got a headline story in the LT didn't they? Good publicity.

People attacking them as "amateurs" are making personal attacks to avoid addressing the issue.

Well done to the lads I say. If there were hundreds of "amateur "posters all over Blackburn the club would be shitting themselves.

Its not too late!

54 minutes ago, glen9mullan said:

I have heard these calls in full and known of their existence for some time.

They are 1000000% legit,

Why they've surfaced tonight i'm unsure, but im glad they have. 

Hopefully its all released and not just the snippets

Any chance of getting a full transcript? I'm not on X.

10 minutes ago, wilsdenrover said:

Nobody is bringing extra people, they’re just trolling.

And they are all going to splash the cash and feed themselves  to a heart attack with Ewood's gourmet food offerings!

Literally dying for their club!

On 14/01/2026 at 03:57, Tyrone Shoelaces said:

You both right and wrong Jim. It is a real photograph from “ Getty Images “. It’s from the game against Stoke City on the 21st of September 1963. We won the game 1-0 with an Andy McEvoy goal. I went to this game, it was shortly after the 7-2 mauling of Spurs, and I was expecting a repeat so I was really disappointed with the 1-0. The only other thing I remember was Stanley Mathews was down to play in the programme but didn’t appear. So I never got to see the great man play.

He was always down to play at that time but he rarely did! Got extra spectators in though!

16 hours ago, bazza said:

So! I'm not the oldest on here. Nice to know that. Take care GHD

I watched my first game in 1952 aged 2 so remember nothing of it! My Grandad, Dad and Uncle were all at the 1928 Cup

Final. I had a season ticket  from age of 5 in the Nuttall St Stand. My Dad stopped going after the 1960 Cup Final  fiasco but  I continued.

In all those years since I have never felt so bad about Rovers state as I do now.

The Venkys have no clue about our culture and the memories and dreams that they are destroying.

EDdit: Sorry --got this wrong. First game 1949!

5 hours ago, simongarnerisgod said:

i think thats it,though there could be another inauspicious loan or forshaw type free transfer coming in,i`ll be amazed if there is another buy,as ever with the chicken disrespectors,someone will likely be sold to offset the jorgensen deal

Well there's not many worth anything but Alebiosu comes to mind. German club reportedly after him.

1 hour ago, Jimmy612 said:

This would surely be an argument packed full of contradictions… Venkys are the best we can possibly hope for, but due to the current state of the club (after 15 years of their ownership) we couldn’t possibly hope to improve on statistically the worst performing manager the club has ever seen? 
 

All those people need to do is ask themselves why they see modern day Rovers as such a poisoned chalice that we couldn’t do better than a manager with a win rate of 28%.  Or would they just tell us we’re a league one club in waiting and that’s the natural order of things? 

Br fair though, the Club is doing its best to  ensure the boycott is a success.

5 hours ago, AndyB said:

Will Elliott Jackson and the LT have the balls to call for him to be sacked?

 

Well they can't ban him!

2 hours ago, LDRover said:

I've had a one or two beverages and have come to conclusion that Ismael is on the right tracks.

The two are clearly linked!

2 hours ago, roversfan99 said:

Managers do this, Ismael is particularly fond of it, but its a totally skewed analysis of the game to put so much focus on that decision.

We were absolutely shocking throughout. Putting so much emphasis on that decision at 2 nil takes focus away from that.

I know as a fan, my annoyance lies predominantly at what we could control today, not refereeing decisions.

Always a bad sign when a manager keeps putting the emphasis bad refereeing decisions. Ismael does it every week.

Pure deflection. As if we've won that game otherwise. We're is serious trouble.