Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

superniko

Members
  • Posts

    2656
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by superniko

  1. 7 minutes ago, roversfan99 said:

    So is the xG not even specific to individual games? I presumed that it was implying that ultimately in the games that we didnt win, that we should have done based on xG. It is incredibly flawed because if most of our xG in 7 games came within 3 games, then that isnt fair to suggest that we should be top based on that!

     

    Yes the table is specific to individual games. e.g. i think one model i saw had us drawing with Bournemouth, beating Watford and Cardiff and losing to Forest.

    The 2nd sentence would be relating to the goal difference and xG actually has us 1 goal fewer than we've scored through the 7 games so far. So we can be top of overall xG table which takes into account game by game and also xG goals scored.

  2. 2 hours ago, roversfan99 said:

    I do think that Reading may well struggle to last the pace, but I have never really embraced the xG table.

    I dont get how you can make the quality of chances created an exact science, you definitely cant.

    Doesnt it also assume that everyone has the same ruthlessness in terms of taking those chances created? In that it implies that it will level out, for example if a team outperforms its place in the xG, maybe that is just because they are clinical with the chances they have.

    Seems like a bit of a nonsense stat to me unless I am missing something.

    I dont get how we are top of the league for it either. I dont feel that in any game so far, even if we have been competitive that we havent got what would be expected on the balance of play.

    It's not a definite science by any measure, but allows you to see where positions may be false and gives you a guide to under/over performance vs luck essentially. For example a poster here assuming Reading were the bookies favourites, probably from just purely looking at the league table. 

    Bookmakers and pro's would incorporate it into their pricing, especially for outright modelling, if we remain as dominant as we have been in the last few matches over the next week or two expect us to be one of the favourites for the league.

    It's not solely based on the quality of chances, it also takes into account the location of the chance and the type of chance e.g. penalty, 1 on 1, header etc. Different companies have different models though and some may not take this into account in lower leagues.

    It's obviously not the be all and end all, but it offers a bit of perspective on what is currently a small sample size (6 games)

    EDIT: what Joe said ?

    • Like 1
  3. 2 hours ago, Uddersfelt Blue said:

    It seems that this season the Red Button is no longer available for Sky subscribers on the Virgin TV platform. 

    You can try on the Sky Sports app (although i think that has to be Sky subscribers too). Otherwise it's free on the Sky Bet app if you happen to have an account with them.

     

    EDIT: noticed plenty of others have suggested this too now.

  4. Couldn’t care less if Brereton doesn’t score all season if he continues with these assists. He’ll prob be a 5-10 a season guy but that’s fine in the role he now plays and as a non-setpiece taker. 
    He was brilliant again today, as was Elliott and I think this will continue to be our starting front 3 for the time being. 

    • Like 7
  5. 22 minutes ago, darrenrover said:

    Assuming all are available, I'd line up:

                         Kaminski

    JRC   Lenihan   Williams   Douglas

           Johnson   Evans   Trybull

    Elliott/Dolan  Armstrong   Brereton   

    Coventry are there to be beaten, we need to be on the front foot and nothing but a victory should suffice.

    COYB!!

    Edit: As Rothwell is unavailable, I can't see us starting with anything other than above in the middle of the park.

    No Holtby? Or is he not available and I’ve missed it? He’s been our best player this season. 

    • Like 2
  6. Buckley was poor against Forest, however Johnson has been no better in the last few games. He also played alongside Evans and Johnson, I’d expect more for him with Holtby in the centre too. Assuming Ayala is injured...


            Kaminski

    JRC Lenihan Williams Douglas

     Holtby Trybull Buckley

    Elliott Armstrong Brereton

  7. 20 minutes ago, Butty said:

    You could see the talent was there, there’s not many people in the side who could play the pass he played through to Armstrong when Foster tipped it over the bar. He will be a good player for us will Elliott. 

    Did he also put the ball through for the yellow card that could/should have been red? I think it was, and it was also a lovely weighted pass. 
    Both were from more central areas though, not convinced he’s an out and out wide man (first time I’ve watched him mind you). 

    • Like 1
  8. Just now, Paul Mani said:

    Kaminski

    Nyambe Lenihan Ayala Douglas

    Holtby Trav Rothwell

    Elliott Dack Arma

    subs - Pears, Williams, JRC, Trybull, Buckley, Dolan, Brereton

    This team / bench gets us into the top 6 of the Championship this season. 

    I posted this same team in the “best team” thread last week. Hopefully post Christmas when everyone is fit, with Dolan and Brereton playing their part in the attacking 3. 
    In the meantime Brereton/Dolan for Dack with Arma in the middle and give Trybull a run until Travis is fit. 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.