Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS, SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

Roverthechimp

Members
  • Posts

    1971
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Other groups

WDWY

Roverthechimp last won the day on May 12 2018

Roverthechimp had the most liked content!

Reputation

1298 Excellent

Profile Information

  • Location
    Sweden

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Looking at the picture of him in the training top i can't help but wonder just how naff they will look without the Macron logo to make it look "authentic"...
  2. Either the figure is based on every possible clause being activated or he is on max 4k a week (remember the "flex" 😁)
  3. Is this the 2024 or 2025 summer window thread? 🤣 Is it the 30th of june when existing contracts actually end? (ie Dolan, Weimann, Baath)
  4. Was it really Waggot that brought in Mowbray? Thought Waggot arrived after Mowbray was already in place (seem to remember misgivings about Tony deciding his own boss)
  5. I am a little concerned that Baath might be offered a better deal by a canny club aiming for promotion. The difference he made to our defence was significant and he showed he can definitely hack it. I'm assuming we will offer him the same as last season and the only question is can he be arsed moving for a few grand extra a week knowing full well that whoever signs him will only give him a 1 year deal (yes i know he only gets a 1 year deal at Rovers but given our amazing transfer record it is a fair bet that another 1 year deal will be offered in 2026 providing he can still walk...)
  6. Minutes of meetings are very very rarely an accurate record of what was actually said and how it was said. More important is to know and respect (and support) the efforts of fan groups to publicly highlight the clown show that is our board, executives and owners. The minutes presented make it incredibly obvious that our executives are full of shit, couldn't plan a piss up in a brewery and that the facade is cracking. They should be applauded for getting this on record in the public domain rather than being admonished for not calling SW/SS/RG/VENKYS total idiots when anyone with 2 brain cells can read that between the lines. For club executives of Blackburn Rovers to make idiotic comparisons to Leeds United and also openly admit that hitting a revenue target is more important than growing our fan base (which would lead to increased revenue longer term) ON RECORD is pretty damning. The statement that it is difficult/impossible to sort out contracts before the end of the season further confirms the total lack of "joined up thinking" at Rovers as they should have been sorted at the end of the 22/23 season or at worst 23/24 if, as per their description, things can only be sorted post season.
  7. Managed all of 25 seconds and quite frankly Gestede is K*%N level duplicitous Edit: would have loved to have shared a taxi with Big Sam after the show - pretty sure he wouldn't have been quite so subtle
  8. Good response Glen - not easy to get various groups of people to agree on the sort of biscuits for meetings let alone an entire agenda/mandate. Appreciate why it is impossible to give a "specific" aim/objective for the coalition much more after your thorough and reasoned explanations and urge everyone to back the initiative.
  9. Whilst I have voted yes to BRFCS backing the aims of the coalition IN PRINCIPLE, it is very hard to say that BRFCS is backing the aims of the coalition without actually being told what those are...?? Fair comment that Glen M acknowledges that it cannot be "his vision" but at present the information above fails to give any indication of what the coalitions aims are (unless it is very simply to give blanket support to each and every group regardless of their agenda). Am I implicitly give approval to any action decided by any group or is the coalition already a defined allegiance of existing groups?) Apologies if i have missed the bloody obvious - would like this to actually achieve traction but fear that it lacks clarity in who and what are being backed and the aims (although i would hope the vision is to remove our current owners and the pisstake appointments at board and operational level)
  10. Agree entirely - question why they don't either cut their losses or at least not pull the rug out everytime we are even close to the top 6...
  11. US Investors - Could a takeover happen at Ewood? In theory - yes In practice - no Why not? That is the (approximately) 233 000 000 dollar question 🤔🤯
  12. Could anyone have imagined Steele in the Premier League? How do we rate his time here in comparison to Pears? (that said i would be absolutely AMAZED if the link is anything other than a puff piece to give Pears a "boost" probably ordered by our glorious ceo...)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.