Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

Ben-2000

Members
  • Posts

    2776
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by Ben-2000

  1. 11 minutes ago, tomphil said:

    If that court date has been put back it's because its been agreed by all party's.

    Why rush when you know you can force the club to generate its money via a player sale, this is looking like another stitch up.

     I hope i'm proved wrong.

    Not necessarily.

    One party can request it and its up to the judge to accept it (or not) if the other party doesn't agree.

    • Like 1
  2. Thanks to all involved for posing the questions.

    But how on earth can he say it's not envisaged because of the owners (blah blah blah) when it's completely out of his and their hands?!

    If they are prevented from paying their dues by the Indian Court then there's no other way of doing so and it's admin!

    IMG_20240117_212524.png

    • Like 3
  3. 1 hour ago, Silas said:

    Just to nip this in the bud, everyone is free to disagree with this statement as strongly as they want.

    But please DO NOT make it personal or about the group as a whole. 

    The reasons for this should be blindingly obvious. 

    Well it's surely the committee as a whole that have signed it off?

  4. They can give 7,000 whether the Riverside is open or not as long as it's at least 15% of stadium capacity.

    Some really bizarre decisions this season thats for sure. From closing the BBE earlier in the season to having all the usual areas open for a tie against League 2 opposition. Could understand it if it was a big PL club.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.