12 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

Would you expect us given our budget? 

Talking about promotion season from league 1 the budget was probably the highest in the league.

It's to be hoped waggott has included Buckley's wage in the projected figures for the next three months he has submitted or is that too much to expect?

Even if funds were raised in the January window it is not beyond the realms of possibility if the judge becomes aware of this for them to turn round and say use that in stead of authorising sending of funds from India to run the club.

Forest Green get to replay the game against Scarborough after fielding an inelligible player yet Barnsley did the same and were chucked out of the competition.

4 hours ago, Polky said:

167 appearances in four years. He’s always injured

 

167 appearances in four years would suggest not.

1 hour ago, DE. said:

but it wouldn't be the worst call for a team like Swansea who need someone to come in and steady the ship without walking into a total disaster.

He constantly moaned about how far from home he was when he was here think Swansea is unlikely unless it's the only offer on the table. He is sixty now so a couple more gigs and that'll do nicely 

The thing moves around so much today the priority is to get something behind it and get it away. With the amount of movement it is very difficult to set yourself to confidently catch it.

The nature of the ball that is used today has a lot to do with keepers decisions to not attempt to catch it.

With having to go to court each time to release funds and having to itemise in detail where those funds are going is a recipe for major problems down the line. All it takes is for a judge to be un persuaded by one payment and we are stuffed.

19 hours ago, Andy said:

Potentially promising news on the Indian restrictions.

If it can be resolved before the January window, we might just have half a chance this season...

Where have you heard/ seen this?

I have had an email this afternoon asking me to re register my account so looks like the message has finally got home.

Interview with David Raya in today's guardian.

For the Leeds game I notice that for a senior there is a £1 difference between the Riverside and the outer wings of the jack walker upper eg ww11. It used to be the case there was a substantial price difference. Smacks of closure of the Riverside by stealth by making it less price attractive to reduce the occupancy to justify the closure.

Willem Tomlinson left Chorley for Radcliffe Borough.

On 14/11/2023 at 13:18, LeftWinger said:

Football 365 have ranked current keepers based on how many goals they've been expected to concede vs how many goals they've actually conceded this season. 

https://www.football365.com/news/feature-premier-league-keepers-ranked-2023-24-psxg

Thomas Kaminski is ranked 1/22 - conceding 4.1 less than expected. 

"Made five saves v Liverpool before letting that one in from Luis Diaz. And then somehow kept out Rasmus Hojlund. He has excelled himself this season even though he is yet to keep a clean sheet"

It's to be hoped we had a good sell on clause as other premier League clubs will be taking note.

Had to put a no longer attending but still interested mate straight last night about the £11 million. He thought we would have a stack of cash to spend in January!

Worst start to a season since 1904 long may it continue 

4 hours ago, wilsdenrover said:

That isn’t the holding company, it’s the one which owns the training ground.

Could be the money from the venture capitalist loan

3 hours ago, Darrenbot said:

Turned out to be a really good game.You got the usual dives and play acting south american style but also plenty of skill.Fluminese ended up winning their first Copa title 2-1 after ET

Got tasty in extra time with two sent off one for over celebration of the winning goal and one for a slap in the face.

7 hours ago, tomphil said:

 

Most clubs at this level need outside funding and a lot still lose 10/20 million a season. 

Exactly this Preston lost £15million year end june22

13 hours ago, bluebruce said:

If they pay us, and then we pay Buckley, would that not result in tax being charged twice?

Think the payment to us by Wednesday would be treated as capital income. The tax would be on Buckley's wage. As we run at a huge loss there is no tax on the capital income received. So only one lot of tax.

1 hour ago, wilsdenrover said:

Surely he currently has a contract with Sheffield Wednesday  - how else could they ‘insist’ on him turning up for training etc?

 

 

 

Don't know the ins and outs of loan deals but look on this from view that Buckos contract is with rovers. If he comes back in January that contract is still running. In the meantime Wednesday took over paying a certain percentage of his wages amount not known. Wednesday pay that percentage to rovers not bucko. Bucko still gets what his contract with rovers is in full. So if Wednesday can't pay it's rovers that suffer not Buckley.Happy to be corrected if that is wrong.

47 minutes ago, wilsdenrover said:

Would it or would he just be owed money by Sheffield Wednesday?
 

 

The agreement would be between the clubs. So we would join the long list of creditors. Bucko is contracted to rovers.

So if sheff Wednesday are struggling to pay wages any contribution they were making on Buckos wage will fall back on us to make up. Totally pointless loan.

7 hours ago, LeftWinger said:

 

Venky's appointments highlighted in yellow. The fact that they've managed to appoint 3 of the worst 6 (statistically when looking at win percentages) the club have ever had - suggests JDT was a fluke. 

 

If it had been left to swag it would be 4 of 6. Credit Greg the egg for the jdt appointment. Will be interesting to see how his win percentage is when reaches Kendall total of matches. Just imagine what jdt would achieve if the owners actually backed him.