Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS, SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

Hoochie Bloochie Mama

Members
  • Posts

    5795
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    70

Everything posted by Hoochie Bloochie Mama

  1. He's now a Prem player with Fulham on about 4 times more than he would have been at Rovers. He must be gutted he moved back down south.
  2. https://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/sport/18684570.agent-suggests-rovers-bid-slovenian-international/ Looks like the agent trying to drive interest. Sharpe saying no bid lodged for midfielder. Also:- While Rovers have funds to spend this season, the Lancashire Telegraph understands that won’t see them spend a seven-figure fee on any player this summer, as EFL clubs continue to battle with the financial climate created by the coronavirus pandemic.
  3. They look good. And i much prefer the sponsor image than Bet 10. 'R' for Rovers!
  4. We pay £6k below the av Champ wage. Only average £10k a week. But of course we can compete ON the pitch. That's a different argument though and comes down mainly to the quality of the manager. Sheff Utd paid less wages than us when they went up but had a far better manager.
  5. With Evans injury prone, Davenport untested and Johnson, well, Johnson, we could do with another CM, especially if we are going to play 3 CM's this season. Sharpe has mentioned that a CM is on the list.
  6. Infantile. See my previous answer. If you don't understand it get someone to explain it to you.
  7. Infantile. We have the one of the lowest incomes. Your friend JH Rover said we could compete with anyone in the division. We can't. The end.
  8. Does it mention Rovers somewhere? Can't see it.
  9. If you could quote where I've said that it would be terrific. Anyway, have a look at the finance table just posted. Then ignore it again, put your fingers in your ears and go la la la. It's about your level.
  10. Only 5 clubs out of 24 have less income than us (2019). We are poor by Championship standards. We can only buy BB and SG because Venky's put money into the club. These are facts.
  11. Absolutely deluded more like. He thinks Jack's still here.
  12. How you can call anyone negative is beyond me. You just keep ignoring the facts.
  13. We offered more money than them by all accounts, but he wanted to play 1st team football which Tony the genius didn't promise!! Their wage bill is £3m less than ours a year. Their revenue is also £3m less. QED.
  14. You do realise those team will be replaced by 3 more coming down from the Prem, loaded with Parachute payments. That's happens every year! FFS man, give it up. You moan about Venky's but the only reason we're buying BB and SG etc is because they're taking on the debt. You can't have it both ways. Our Revenue is bottom half in the Championship. WE can't compete. The only thing keeping us going is Venky share issues. And no this isn't a defence of Venky's!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  15. No we can compete with half the division, the bottom half. You said top half. Stop moving the goalposts! Anyway, North End are paupers FFS! They have to sell every summer. North End aren't Villa, Watford, Stoke etc etc etc. We spend less than the average wage in this division. 15 teams spend more than us on wages; Look at the Leftwinger chart again. Some of those teams spend double what we do. AND AGAIN YOU SAID TOP HALF, NOT HALF THE DIVISION. YOU THINK WE CAN COMPETE WITH EVERYONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ARRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH?
  16. So what are you moaning about then?
  17. Because they don't spend £12m on 2 strikers.
  18. We're no different to North End. Similar crowds, a bit bigger budget. They can't compete with half the division either. You're denying facts.
  19. We can compete with half the Championship. The bottom half. You said Top half.
  20. Sharpe tweeted a while ago they were offering nearly double what Rovers could offer.
  21. This was your original post. it's quite clear you think we can compete with everyone financially which is just wrong.
  22. You weren't discussing it with me, it's on page 321. So, yes, you were asking who in the top half we couldn't compete, the implication being we could compete with everybody.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.