islander200

Has he signed for Cardiff?

Brooks to Southampton a great loan signing Surely they get automatics with the squad they have

Yeah but then who would be playing wingbacks? I could be wrong but very surprised if it isn't 4 at the back

It's more likely that Palace have edged closer to our valuation so not risking him tonight.If it was definitely on already then he wouldn't be on the bench tonight

Only Wharton and Hyam are centre backs

Must be JRC and Garrett

I really hope we send these clowns home with their tales between their legs Doubly hope it isn't the last we see of A Wharton in the blue n white tonight

I overreacted.Anyway Nat Phillips didn't sign today like Nixon said he would

I stand corrected on the 3 links. But no my initial response to this Nixon discussion was from someone saying "nixon love in"

Nobody says it is gospel.Who on here says every tweet/transfer link nixon dishes out is gospel? My argument is posters if they wish to believe and discuss his tweets/Articles then they should be allowed to do that without having to listen to shit like ",Nixon love in" Nickoteen etc etc etc If people think Nixon is just full of shit then scroll past the transfer link via nixon being discussed if they don't believe it anyway.

Yes he gets stuff wrong no doubt But I could screenshot a whole host of tweets from him that was correct. Like only last week the Wharton bid from palace. His articles/tweets are clearly worth discussing

No I wasn't waiting it wouldn't have been mentioned at all but to be frank im sick of the pathetic comments you make regarding people who discuss Nixon's articles.The way you write your posts and respond to people specifically Chaddy you think your always right.It wasn't just a case of disagreeing with Chaddy you were practically laughing at his suggestion that we could sell Gallagher in this window Directly after I wrote my message you are going on with nonsense such as "Nixon love in" Now I do not believe everything I read from Nixon, and yeah he gets plenty wrong but he also every single window gets stuff right.Like only 3 or 4 days ago he broke the Wharton bid.Like he broke the interest in Ennis.The interest in O'Riordan. So his articles are clearly worth discussing and doesn't need you putting posters down when they do.

He has had bids the Ipswich manager has confirmed that. So obviously someone is willing to pay money for him this January which Roversfan found a ridiculous suggestion when Chaddy mentioned selling him.

Your first post to me on this discussion was "has someone paid a fee for Gallagher?

Ipswich have place multiple bids for Sam Gallagher.Ipswich manager confirmed they bid for him. Hope that clears it up?

Well he quite clearly isn't clueless is he? Who was the first to report the Wharton bid? Who was the first to say we were signing Ennis? Who was the first to say we wanted 0'Riordan? Clueless to me is someone who never gets anything right.Plenty of evidence Nixon does.

No but someone has bid money Rigger which Roversfan laughed at Chaddy for suggesting it. So if someone puts a cash bid in quite clearly there is someone willing to pay cash for him this January.

It isn't a love in. He gets plenty right .Proven every summer that he does.Like the stuff I just mentioned above. If you don't want to believe him fine.But it's pathetic that every time someone mentions something from him ,have to listen to you with your pathetic "Nixon love in" You don't believe him, then just scroll past people it ,rather than the pathetic comments. Anyway you must be getting over shock... earlier in the season when Chaddy suggested selling Gallagher in January you said " absolutely no chance someone will pay a fee for Gallagher"

Anybody watch Netflix's Griselda? Finished it last night thought it was decent.6 parter based on the true story of Griselda Blanco , the godmother of the cocaine scene in Miami

It was nixon who broke the Ennis to Bolton story And the palace bid for Wharton And pretty sure he was the first with O' Riordan (I might be wrong about that 1 but not the other 2)

Nixon saying Ennis deal to Bolton is more than likely off as we are asking for £500k loan fee

Gallagher out of contract in the summer even if we take up the option no guarantee there will be a buyer in the summer so even if a loan I'd take Yates as he is as good if not better than Gallagher. I wouldn't sell Gallagher to be replaced by an unknown but if we can get Yates then we should take the money

He probably is committed now but that won't last while we are a championship club.I don't want him sold this window and certainly not for the £18.5 million that is suggested but I do think In the summer Wharton will want to move up a level. As for Palace not being a good move...he would start there and only has to look at Eze, who signed from QPR, has had an England call up and linked with a £60 million move to Manchester City.

I don't want him sold this window ,but eventually (summer) the player will want to test himself in the premier league (surely has ambitions of playing for England).Talk of £50 million is pie in the sky stuff. £25 mil -£30 mil is the absolute max a premier league club will pay for a player that doesn't play in the top division

So what if Swans fans don't like Yates? Pre leaving Blackpool fans certainly didn't hate him.