The lad we signed from Nantes counts too

Surely the player and the players agent would know and wouldn't they have been pushing to get it done? If he had a permit to play over here gives him more options if he wanted to move on in the summer or January

Good reply Il leave you to carry on making stuff up to suit your argument. "Where has this Pears is a liability come from all of a sudden" message board gold

If any truth to the story I presume to bring the lad from seria B in we would have had to get rid of one of the players who is taking up one of the 4 slots.

Player hate? Because I think he is poor and not competent enough to be a number 1 In this division...its not like I'm within earshot and shouting abuse at him. The most nonsense is being spoken by you describing the £500k we received for Steele as a decent fee.When we bought him for twice as much . Even more nonsense was the post yesterday "Where has this Pears is a liability come from ". "He was in net when we finished 7th" Completely ignoring the fact he started 18 games that season, we conceded 19 goals in those games and only won 5.We had been top 6 most that season eventually dropping out of it towards the end with Pears in net

It's the million pound that I find nonsense. Iv no doubt they probably did hope that one day we could command a decent fee for Pears with him being English, young etc but when do we sell first team players for as little as that, regular starters I mean We paid £500k or close too for Pears so for me it is nonsense that he is being played to make a tiny profit.And made a loss on Steele, so this model of buying young English goalkeepers to make a profit on them certainly isn't working if that was/is the plan Pears played so much because the alternatives were worse(apart from the weird spell when Jdt kept him in over Kaminski) If the club have bought worse than Pears or a keeper that it's gonna take months to get up to speed then serious questions need to be asked(I know they wouldn't be answered) and if Toth doesn't work out and it turns out it was Benson who chose both him and Whalstedt, then he should be getting sacked (again it won't happen) The owners do sanction sales for big players for fees less than they are worth, but it is very rare we are selling first team lads for fees like a million quid

I'm sure people are bored of your nonsense that the club are playing Pears in the hope they can sell him for a million after 100 apps in the championship Il post what i want within the rules I couldn't give a flying fuck if it does bore you

How is it irrelevant. We made a loss on him isn't your point the these are development goalkeepers that the club want to make a bit of profit on, giving them games and being English hoping that will up their fee ? We bought steele for something like a million and sold him to Sunderland for a bit over half that a year later he went to Brighton on a free transfer .So he can't be used as a success story on our end

We made a loss on Steele.We bought him for more than we sold him for.We also sold him for less than we just spent on the Hungarian

I'm going off the keepers that we were linked with like Travers,Rushworth...even Ruddy, we wouldn't have been looking at those names if Eustace had indicated he was satisfied with Pears as number 1 Time will tell but Pears is making mistakes nearly every match so i really hope that a decision hasn't been made to stick with Pears and Toth has been brought in as number 2

Don't need to see quotes. The goalkeepers we were being linked with most summer would have been number one....Rushworth, Travers,De lange etc. The team have started well. I just don't think Pears has played well this start of the season, he has had moments of absolutely rubbish goalkeeping and only an unreal block by tronstad and a bit of luck against Burnley when he came out into no man's land we would have conceded at least 2 more goals this season I don't believe he would be number 1 at any other championship club.If he does lose his place to Toth and decides he wants to leave as he should be a number 1, I don't see any club at this level or above buying him as a first choice goalkeeper .

So does that mean anyone who started in our wins that is fit should keep their place despite how they played individually? I'm sorry but i do not agree.If we had been keeping clean sheets and he looked solid fair enough but Pears has made mistakes in every league game so far and someone else in goal can't come quick enough for me. Do you think he would be a starting number 1 at any other club? Its clear that Eustace wants a new number 1, he didn't get his choice but I'm hoping this choice of Toth is much better than Whalstedt. I don't expect Toth to start v Bristol due to only being in the country a few days and then having to go away again but I expect him in soon as it is obvious Eustace doesn't particularly rate Pears like most the rest of us

Again Whalstedt was a shit goalkeeper. Plenty of foreign goalkeepers have come over here, played almost straight away and done well

They have spent nearly £1 million on the new goalkeeper, so keep Pears in the side to make the money we spent on Toth back off a Pears sale? Pears wouldn't be a number 1 at any other Club. We spent all summer being linked with goalkeepers that would have undoubtedly been number 1 here. Just because we haven't heard much about Toth doesn't mean he won't be number 1 going forward or that he will be poor like Whalstedt.

Just because Burnley didn't score doesnt mean there wasn't any bloopers In the first half when he came rushing off his line with a sea bodies in front of him ,absolutely no chance of getting the ball.0nly good fortune stopped Foster scoring again