dillo_dillo Posted July 5, 2010 Posted July 5, 2010 http://www.fifa.com/worldcup/statistics/castrolindex/ranking.html 1 3 Germany Philipp LAHM 9.79 Defender 2 Spain SERGIO RAMOS 9.74 Defender 3 6 Spain Gerard PIQUE 9.70 Defender 4 -3 Spain Joan CAPDEVILA 9.66 Defender 5 17 Spain David VILLA 9.62 Forward 6 28 Netherlands Wesley SNEIJDER 9.59 Midfielder 7 30 Germany Thomas MUELLER 9.56 Midfielder 8 -1 Brazil JUAN 9.53 Defender 9 41 Uruguay Luis SUAREZ 9.50 Forward 10 9 Brazil GILBERTO SILVA 9.48 Midfielder 11 -5 England Steven GERRARD 9.45 Midfielder 12 -9 Paraguay Antolin ALCARAZ 9.43 Defender 13 -5 Paraguay Paulo DA SILVA 9.40 Defender 14 99 Germany Miroslav KLOSE 9.38 Forward 15 1 Brazil MICHEL BASTOS 9.36 Defender 16 -11 Argentina Martin DEMICHELIS 9.34 Defender 17 10 Ghana John PANTSIL 9.32 Defender 18 Brazil LUCIO 9.30 Defender 19 1 Japan Eiji KAWASHIMA 9.28 Goalkeeper 20 8 Netherlands Gregory VAN DER WIEL 9.26 Defender
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
Oklahoma Posted July 5, 2010 Posted July 5, 2010 I wonder where they get those stats... Some are correct, others are just laughable. Just for example: 104 - Diego Forlan 107 - Cristiano Ronaldo How is that even possible??!!?!?! Forlan, one of the best strikers in this WC, his national team is in the semis... Ronaldo, one of the biggest disapointments in the WC (in front of the entire french team, at least lol) and Portugal already at home. Only 3 places apart?!?!?! Forlan should be higher and Ronaldo should be lower in that list.
thenodrog Posted July 6, 2010 Posted July 6, 2010 Gerrard 11, Schweinsteiger 25. Er... Exactly.... Gerrards above Miroslav Klose too. As soon as I saw those that list meant nowt.
Eddie Posted July 6, 2010 Posted July 6, 2010 That's because Gerrard is world class and Schweinsteiger is overrated. None of you have ever asked me who I work for...
tony gale's mic Posted July 6, 2010 Posted July 6, 2010 That's because Gerrard is world class and Schweinsteiger is overrated. None of you have ever asked me who I work for... I thought you worked in a Parisian bar? Whatever you think of the players' actual abilities is irrelevant in this discussion, this ranking measures how well players have played this tournament.
Gus Gus Posted July 6, 2010 Posted July 6, 2010 Whatever you think of the players' actual abilities is irrelevant in this discussion, this ranking measures how well players have played this tournament. I guess you also think that modern financial theory is a resounding success.
Eddie Posted July 6, 2010 Posted July 6, 2010 I thought you worked in a Parisian bar? Whatever you think of the players' actual abilities is irrelevant in this discussion, this ranking measures how well players have played this tournament. 1) It was tongue in cheek. 2) No I don't.
grizfoot Posted July 8, 2010 Posted July 8, 2010 Ryan Nelsen at 264 is an outrage, there's no way there was 263 better players than him at the World Cup. He was brilliant against both Italy and Paraguay. Also Glen Johnson is higher ranked than Mezut Ozil.
philipl Posted July 10, 2010 Posted July 10, 2010 That FIFA list is a joke. So are the recorded heights of players at the World Cup!
philipl Posted July 10, 2010 Posted July 10, 2010 Dave, if you look at the heading, you will see it was supposed to be there! suggests the players are cheating in declaring their heights and rounding the numbers up!
jodrell Posted July 10, 2010 Posted July 10, 2010 Philip all your links to the NYP seem to have a problem. I am not sure if you have a subscription or it is something else?
Bobby G Posted July 12, 2010 Posted July 12, 2010 I think it favors defensive players for some reason. Maybe you get more points for interceptions, blocks, tackles, etc...Plus the distances defenders run especially attacking ones means they're "workhorses".
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.