Venky’s v Indian Government (a) - 12/11/2025 - if a ref can be secured

[wilsdenrover]

6 minutes ago, KentExile said:

Boooooo

I can promise you no one is more disappointed in me than I am. 

[Roversider]

1 hour ago, wilsdenrover said:

I can promise you no one is more disappointed in me than I am. 

Everyone appreciates what you're doing, many thanks for all your efforts.  I suspect that you must have the patience of a Saint!

[Old Codger]

20 minutes ago, Roversider said:

Everyone appreciates what you're doing, many thanks for all your efforts.  I suspect that you must have the patience of a Saint!

We are all very well trained for the job these days, given the amount of time we watched Travis and Hedges pass the ball backwards to break up our own attacks.

Raarrr.

[Makrover]

1 hour ago, wilsdenrover said:

No.

The Directorate of Enforcement were told in court last Friday to produce a copy of the complaint they’ve made to the Adjudicating Authority and a new hearing (today’s) was scheduled.

Today Venkys stated they hadn’t been provided with this copy (and neither had the court).

Because of this the judge rescheduled for tomorrow.

So it’s not a hearing about the tax stuff but the venkys (I think) have apparently put in a complaint to the adjudging authority and there denying it???

 

apologies if not

[wilsdenrover]

27 minutes ago, Makrover said:

So it’s not a hearing about the tax stuff but the venkys (I think) have apparently put in a complaint to the adjudging authority and there denying it???

 

apologies if not

The Complaint to the Adjudicating Authority has been made by the Directorate of Enforcement.

This is the procedure which follows their investigation and is basically them saying they believe Venkys have a case to answer.

The Venkys want to see the complaint as they want to know if the value of the  guarantees they’ve had to lodge and the properties they’ve had seized is higher than the sum involved in their alleged wrongdoings.

If It does, I think they’re going to argue this means the guarantee condition (for them remitting money overseas) should be removed.

Edited 3 hours ago by wilsdenrover

[wilsdenrover]

I think tomorrow is going to be (yet another) occasion where there isn’t time for the case to be heard. 

It is listed as case number 111 and the 24th which is a ‘supplemental matter’.

Supplemental matters are taken up when the court returns after lunch at 14:30 and the court finishes at 16:30 (Delhi time).

I think the word we’re all looking for is farcical.

Edited 3 hours ago by wilsdenrover