RoversTilliDie

I agree, all the money Jack Walker invested in Rovers(only for his sons to take it out), you'd think we would have a decent drainage system.

Maybe they could do it in politics, a replay of the general election, 5 more years of the tories.

Ill be there for the replay, but still think it's an unfair decision.

It's probably going back to medieval times, Blackburn were anti parliamentarian. Who fucking isn't these days.

If Blackburn Rovers are sensible enough to only allow 500 Ipswich supporters tickets for the replay, I'll turn up for the replay.

It certainly helps the laughing tractor boys, goal scrubbed, and man sent off scrubbed, and the final swansong, they beat us in the replay.

If it pisses it down in London, and were a goal down, Ismael should bring the players off. We know the outcome now, the goals scrubbed and it's a replay. I usually put a smiley face at the end, but I'm fucking serious

It's a fucking joke of a decision, it's because it's Blackburn Rovers they came up with that decision. Most refs are biased to the opposition at Ewood, and the fa. For some reason we're not there cup of tea.

I will not be going to the replayed game, in protest of the decision.

The outcome would be 3pts to Rovers, if it was my decision. 1-0 up with around 10 minutes to go plus added on, there weren't many stoppages, and Ipswich down to 10 men. I'm sure any Ipswich supporter would think the same, if the glove was on the other hand.

I thought Rovers put in a decent performance, in the atrocious conditions against Ipswich. I'm thinking positive, 0-3 Rovers, Gudjohnssen off the mark.

Gudjohnssen hasn't had is chance yet, on as sub last 20 minutes against Watford, and on as sub in atrocious conditions against Ipswich.

Giving us the win would be justified, we were in control of the game with 10 minutes left. We're you there, or did you watch it from your armchair.

If it was Mancheter United or Liverpool you could, guaranteed the points would go to them.

I'm an old timer who's disappointed not to see us pick up are 1st home win of the season.

Well said, almost 7/8ths of the game played, rovers have a strong case for being awarded the points.

Almost 80 minutes on the clock, that's almost 7/8ths of the game played. I think Rovers should be awarded the points.

The only way a Rovers player would have been injured, is by an Ipswich player, who were over aggressive when rovers got the ball. What was the Ipswich card tally, 4 or 5 yellows and a red.

I looked at the river before kick off, it wasn't that high.

You could have gone in front, hirst through 0-1 if it hadn't been for a great save from Toth, but we were in control at 1-0, that's football abandoned.

Atrocious conditions at Ewood, well done Rovers, decent performance, unlucky with the postponement.

They were probably celebrating, because they got out of jail. Rovers were in control of the game 1-0 up, and Ipswich were lucky they weren't down to nine men, lucky there was a man just in front of the defender, for there 4th yellow card.

They'll probably be awarded the win, if it happened, fergie rules.

I agree, unplayable the last 10 minutes.

Rovers 1 nil up, Ipswich down to 10 men, match abandoned after almost 80 minutes on the clock. If there were fair rules in football, Ipswich would be down to 10 men for 10 minutes of the replay, with Rovers 1-0 in front. Wishful thinking, it will just be a replay.