
bluebruce
Members-
Posts
15428 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
30
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Uncouth Garb - The BRFCS Store
Everything posted by bluebruce
-
If it's as likely as those, it's most likely to fail badly. We need someone a lot more likely than those. Not another low calibre, inexperienced offering.
-
The mysterious case of Joe Rothwell.
bluebruce replied to Neal's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
People aren't rewriting history by rating Rochina, they just rated Rochina. Like I did, at the time. Wasn't perfect but should have got a lot more game time. Rothwell is more direct, quicker, with very good technique (though not as good as Rochina's). He needs to hone that end product to be a serious star, but he needs to keep getting games. -
Not meaning to be snitty at all, but obviously I know why he doesn't have experience with transfers and that it's not his fault. But he still doesn't have experience with transfers. It's very much like the difference between international and club management. The former, and reserve football, are about working with what you're given, often under an extended period where you get years to make it happen. Club management is partly about taking what you're given, but then rapidly turning it into something better is usually the expectation, under huge pressure, with the transfer market being probably the most important tool for doing this. It's absolutely possible to move from reserve or international management into being a great club manager. Hughes is a terrific example. But it's a risk we'd be unwise to take at this time, as it really is a different world.
-
I acknowledged he was missing some regulars. First team went up to a higher level too, a much higher level than DJ has managed. TM has missed opportunities in the transfer market, but DJ doesn't have any experience of it at all. Johnson is doing great work, but we need a proven Championship-level manager, not another gambit.
-
It has. And they're still not safe because they were that bad at the start of the season. Adapting to a new league and missing several regulars from the prior season, sure, but it's a results business over a full season and they can technically still go down (I make it they need just 1 more point though from the last two tricky games). Those clamouring for him to be first team boss need to reflect on how little experience he has. We need to get an experienced pro with a track record, not repeat the Kean and Bowyer experiments from within.
-
The mysterious case of Joe Rothwell.
bluebruce replied to Neal's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
He could be much worse than Bell there. It's not his position and he's athletically derelict. -
In fairness, having the reserve team manager give the first team manager tips is very insulting and if you think it's gotten to that stage the first team manager needs firing instead (he does). Not so sure Johnno is imminently off. They have been very good for several months now but let's not forget they're not actually safe yet.
-
The mysterious case of Joe Rothwell.
bluebruce replied to Neal's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
I didn't actually think Mulgrew looked a particularly great defender at League One level to be honest. He had his moments, but the goals definitely papered over the cracks even then. The cracks are just bigger now, plus as you say he's a year older. I've generally felt his biggest problem is a tendency to go walkabouts positionally though at the wrong moments, which age should improve not worsen. Pace is only his second biggest problem for me. -
As one of those posters, it's fairly simple. It's one poor result too many. Too long of him being unable to see the glaring errors and correct them. Everybody has their own breaking point, this was mine. It isn't really the performance, it's the result. I said before the game, days ago, in the Mowbray stay or go thread that a defeat today would be the final straw for me. I'm not being reactionary, it's all perfectly measured. Obviously, I've been concerned for quite a while now, then very concerned, and questioned decisions/tactics etc throughout his reign, but I've just given him the amount of time I personally thought he'd earned to turn it around. Factoring in the terror that Venkys next potential appointment leaves me with. If yours was expended a while ago, fair enough, I can see why
-
I didn't understand why you said this earlier either. To my knowledge Raya has been criticised in public once, and entirely rightly so. He did excellently today. Not at fault for the goal and two super saves. TM will probably blame Rothwell (yes he's only done that once too, but Rothwell is an attacker, not the goalie who has made plenty of mistakes this year or the absolutely porous defence who rarely get blamed considering).
-
That settled it for me (as I fully expected it to). Put my vote down for go. His comments make increasingly less sense and bode badly for the future, his tactics are baffling and ineffective, his team selections mysterious at best, and he has lost the fans, maybe some of the players too from some of the performances. Made a valiant effort to keep us up last time, met expectations by getting us promoted, started strongly this season...but the wheels have well and truly fallen off and we need a new car. Thanks Tony, hopefully bye soon Tony. I wish him well going forward if/when he goes.
-
I wouldn't be so sure. It could get spent on central midfielders to convert to centre halves. Or possibly wingers to convert to full backs. Maybe central midfielders to convert to wingers, like Rothwell. The options are limitless (except for signing players to play in their actual positions, that's taboo). We could even sign very expensive players in pretty much any position, to play on the bench. Which may happen increasingly as we stick strictly to our artists:soldiers ratio regardless of the opposition. You shouldn't pigeon-hole our transfer plans like that, the world is our oyster (Please note, oysters will be used as sharks, pigeon-holes will be used as badger dens).
-
Good stuff. Would have preferred they sent him to a league team if he was a likely starter (otherwise no point) as we do have cover and the chances of even Raya getting another knock are slim. At least he's getting game time and doing well. Doubt FC United is a better level than our u-23s, but it will do him good to play men's football for a bit. What's Roverschat?
-
The mysterious case of Joe Rothwell.
bluebruce replied to Neal's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
The worrying thing is though, he seems to think the full back not up to it is Nyambe, rather than the dolloper-in-chief Williams (jury a little out on Bell, but I'd rather he was only backup at the moment ideally). I say this because: 1) The defensive winger usually plays on the right, with our most attacking of the two, Arma, playing on the left. Because ya know, we're safe as houses down our left. 2) Nyambe had a brief bad patch back in December was it? Then I think got injured. Then came back, and was still kept out of the team for months, with Bennett often played out of position instead. According to Mowbray this was due to his bad patch in December. A long time to hold a bad patch against someone when most of the first XI have them on a monthly basis. I really don't think he rates Nyambe. Further signs are from the rumour mentioning we were looking for a RB but no mention of a LB. Granted, numerically, right back seems the bigger issue for squad depth reasons, but Williams is utterly useless and Bell inconsistent. I don't think we're going to see a new LB in summer. -
The A-League is Australian (with one New Zealand team, Wellington Phoenix). The New Zealand domestic football is definitely tinpot. Not that as a nation they can't put out the odd legend...
-
The mysterious case of Joe Rothwell.
bluebruce replied to Neal's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
I don't buy this 'one defensive winger' approach. I mean, why? Either both flanks need that level of defensive cover from the wings, or neither do. Having one attacking winger and one defensive one doesn't somehow average out so that both flanks have some degree of protection and some degree of attacking nous. It doesn't bring 'balance' to the team like he claims, it makes it lopsided!! I can appreciate that in some games, against certain teams with a particularly dangerous winger, putting somebody more defensive there has its merits, absolutely. God knows why it is a standing policy though almost regardless of who we play.