Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

alex l

Members
  • Posts

    676
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by alex l

  1. 30 minutes ago, Upside Down said:

    All of that is likely to go with Venkys. 

    There's a difference between not knowing the facts and militantly denying reality.

    I agree. But there will be a large number of Blackburn fans who range from casually following the club and looking for results to those who wait for club or local news articles to pop up. They won't necessarily know things which have taken place. By saying they support Venkys therefore they don't support Rovers, it creates a division that wouldn't likely make them want to look into what has happened or not believe it. 

    • Like 1
  2. 5 hours ago, Upside Down said:

    They aren't fans. Never have been.

     

    37 minutes ago, Upside Down said:

    If you're a supporter of venkys then you are not a supporter of Blackburn Rovers. 

    It's like calling yourself a peace activist whilst supporting a war.

    Not everyone sees everything in such a binary manner. By making it so divisive, you're potentially alienating people who either aren't aware of what you are or people who could join your view.

    I would love Venkys to leave but on the provision we don't end up with someone worse and there's been a fair few examples of them throughout football. I also don't accept administration as being a necessary step - nevermind what happens to the club's league position, I'd be concerned for employees suddenly out of work. The academy would likely go, which along with the stadium, are jack's remaining legacy. 

    • Like 3
  3. Just now, jwlrovers said:

    Maybe explains why a loan for Leonard never seemed on the cards... they knew he would be needed as one of three.

    But we let Ennis go, and that was only confirmed later on when we believed McGuire was completed, along with Vale. Another attacker would have been needed to let Leonard go out. 

  4. Even if the appeal is successful I'm more bothered about McGuire's frame of mind. Flies halfway around the world to find the situation has changed, left in limbo trying to sort something, back to us...and now this. At 22 he's still only a young adult. Having an ambition seemingly taken away, back in place and if it's taken away again... I'd be distraught if that was my kid. Either way the club needs to do everything possible to look after him. 

    • Like 1
  5. 5 minutes ago, RevidgeBlue said:

    Especially not from GB.

    What do you expect GB to do? Sign Mbappe and De Gea and Bellingham? 

    Gets told he has to generate transfer funds to spend and then it turns out those funds have to be used largely for running costs. Wage budget gets slashed too, so harder to attract the better free agents. Even those he may be able to sign (Baath) get vetoed from above. 

    Both are working with their hands and feet tied behind them. Easy to say quit in protest but some people need a livelihood or have integrity when they've signed up to a job. It's those around them and above them that could do with he same. 

    • Like 5
  6. Hopefully Nick finds time to look into the Venkys again. I trust him to provide an objective view on them and, in turn, provide some context on how Rovers' ownership is viewed outside of the club. Without administration, points deductions or other sanctions (and without the Venkys making outlandish comments like the owners of Reading of Sheffield Wed), there seems to be little reason for the media to give them coverage 

    • Like 2
  7. 5 hours ago, Galgaterover10 said:

    What a weird assumption!! You think JDT leaving will cryptically be tweeted by the women’s Twitter account. That is peak levels of conspiracy 

    No, crossed wires. My thoughts on the situation are not related to the tweet. I was initially saying the tweet was, due to the time mentioned, not great. I then in the second paragraph gave my thoughts on jdts situation. 

    • Like 1
  8. 22 minutes ago, Tom said:

    Would assume they’ve signed a player from Northern Ireland?

    Very possibly, just think it's ill thought given the fan base are now waiting to hear from JDT which will be around 5pm. 

    Purely my own thoughts...I think he announces he is leaving now or at the end of the season. They didn't want him saying it today so as to not distract from the immediate game. 

  9. Well on one hand a DoF was employed who appointed a coach who has brought an attacking, exciting style of play, with mixed results. The DoF has also been much more proactive in getting players on longer contracts, so players don't keep walking away on a free. Theoretically this provides greater financial stability. 

    On the other hand, as we're all aware, finances have been tightened and the promise of last season has pretty much all been eroded.

    • Like 2
  10. 2 minutes ago, Herbie6590 said:

    It can’t, arithmetically it literally isn’t the case. 

    But some see it as a go to phrase whenever we sell a player (whilst equally angry when a player goes for free). 

    It's understandable not spending millions today, to a degree. But the fan base will reasonably expect millions to be spent in the summer. 

  11. 3 minutes ago, Dreams of 1995 said:

    Ya know what’s mad - Travis got loaned out because Wharton was taking his place in the 6 role

    Then we sold Wharton

    And we didn’t bring anybody in to replace either 

    Classic Venkys 

    I'd say Tronstad is the 6, Wharton more an 8 which I'd expect JRC to take when Brittain is back. 

    Ennis sale confirmed by the club. Only positive with that signing was getting a fee for him. 

    • Like 1
  12. 5 minutes ago, roverandout said:

    I'm actually at the point again like I was under Mowbray where I hope rovers get beat so we'll go down and venkys eff off. Unlike Mowbray I like jdt. Just pissed off with the whole club. I really couldn't give a toss anymore.  Rovers have been flat lining for the past 10 years and those cnuts have refused to defibrillate the club

    Not trying to be antagonistic but if you don't care anymore why are you reading and actively engaging with this part of the board? Genuinely, if it upsets you this much, take a break from all to do with the club. You might feel better for it.

    • Like 2
  13. 5 minutes ago, RevidgeBlue said:

    That was then before the Indian Court proceedings and this is now in case you hadn't noticed.

    I'm sure you have but are on the wind up.

    The post I was responding to said we should bring back the talk of Venkys asset stripping. I'm not happy with how they run the club but I don't think this can accurately be labelled at them. 

    • Like 3
  14. 2 minutes ago, TheKitGuy said:

    It was a term phrased a lot during Venkys tenure, however it needs to be brought back. This is asset srripping at its finest. Anything that can be sold for any worth it's gone. The V's are playing their own version of bargain hunt and we sadly are the viewer. 

    The amount of players, some of whom we received bids for and were turned down, who have left on frees would suggest otherwise. As would the continual loss they make in putting money into the club. 

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.