11 minutes ago, rigger said:

Just maybe, it isn't down to the standard of the keepers, but what this Rovers do with them.

Turned a Belgian that nobody on here had probably heard of into a Prem keeper whilst getting call ups to his national team? Took a young Spaniard and helped develop him so that a premier league bound team wanted him and he has played for his country and a title challenger? Jason steele is also now a Prem first choice keeper for a top half team. 

If we did this with every single keeper we signed it'd be a miracle. 

4 minutes ago, K-Hod said:

Doesn’t matter if that court day is tomorrow, next week, or next month.

We’ll still get the bare minimum to spend on the playing squad and be told we should be grateful that they’re keeping the lights on.

Venky’s out.

Respectfully disagree. If the money isn't available soon it could force us to sell an asset to cover general outgoings and leave the squad even weaker than it is. Relegation then becomes even more of a possibility and the loss of even more players. We go from barely treading water to head under the water line. 

19 minutes ago, RevidgeBlue said:

That would be a slightly better way of doing it but I'm still not aware that Arsenal have an outright obligation to purchase Raya at the end of his loan.

Super ITK Fabrizio Romano said the clauses for the Raya deal to be permanent were very basic, implied that it was as good as done unless Raya somehow missed the full season which hasn't been the case. It was due to FFP that arsenal didn't make it a permanent signing at the time. 

1 minute ago, JHRover said:

Neither JDT nor Mowbray have been able to assemble their own backroom teams. Instead they have had to accept working with inherited staff: Lowe and Benson. And in JDT's case also Johnson.

Regardless of their capabilities or lack of, it cannot be right that they are in place indefinitely regardless of manager/performance/results.

The bigger question is who has decided that they are irreplaceable and why.

Bordering on conspiracy. Next to be targeted will be the retail manager and the lottery ticket sellers. Could it perhaps be possible that these people do a reasonable job for the wages we can afford/pay and therefore successive coaches/management have been fine with them remaining in situ? Or must it be something more devious and underhand? 

1 hour ago, Exiled_Rover said:

JDT wasn't allowed to bring his own staff in with him - Benson and Lowe came with the club.

It's part of why we weren't able to attract a more experienced manager. Carvalhal walked away when we insisted he'd have to keep Lowe and Benson. 

He brought in his assistant and I also think he appointed Ben Rosen. But that isn't the point, if Benson was so poor as some make out, why would TM and JDT have persisted with him? Why would Kaminski have specifically thanked him instead of pushing for a new GK coach during his time here - along with all the other GKs we've had on the books?

Benson seems to get a lot of flack for our keepers not being a cross between Manual Neuer and Alisson yet it's ignored he has coached our last 2 senior keepers, both of whom are established in the prem. 

23 minutes ago, islander200 said:

Nixon saying we looked at the Watford striker Rajovic to replace Gallagher, Watford want £4 million 

Certainly wouldn't be a purchase then. Sounds reminiscent of selling Rhodes and ending up with Graham on loan (if memory serves me) although that ended up well enough, eventually. 

31 minutes ago, Mercer said:

 

As for Broughton and our recruitment team - just what the feck do they do and what gems do they find?

 

You can find all the gems in the world but if you've no budget you're not buying them. Of the signings under GB I'd say Szmodics is absolutely a success, yes he wasn't an unknown, but who else took a punt? Hyam is decent although his form has dipped and Tronstad and Siggy look reasonable. However GB's most important work has been sorting out most of the contract situations. 

8 hours ago, simongarnerisgod said:

clear your cookies and site data and that annoying subscrition banner will stop for a few days

Alternatively as soon as the article page loads, click the x (the one which becomes the refresh button) to stop it loading further. This stops everything beyond the first paragraph from being hidden. 

7 minutes ago, Gav said:

I'd rather have the player right now personally. 

I'm sure it's been said there's a one year extension option as well, so he only goes for free if the club decide to release him, like Dack. The difference with Gally is I think JDT wants to play him, he generally does when he is fit. 

31 minutes ago, RoversSG said:

My 11 of those we should never have sold/ or sold for peanuts

 

Formation: 3-5-2 (Since I can't think of any leftback)

Raya

Nyambe, Lenihan, Van Hecke, 

Marshall, Reed, Rothwell, Cairney, BBD

Rhodes, Joshua King

JPvH and Reed were loans, they pretty much had to leave. Nyambe, Lenihan, Rothwell, BBD and King went as their contracts expired - another issue which has been discussed endlessly. Rhodes was desperate to leave and I believe we got 8m, so hardly peanuts. 

19 minutes ago, roversfan99 said:

He mentioned when Travis went about his wages. Every decision at the moment seems to be driven by cost cutting, not about what is best for the team. 

JDT also said Travis wanted to leave in the summer and expressed the same wish again in October, as he wanted to play more in the role he wanted. Had Trav not wanted to move, it's difficult to say what may have happened. 

We all know our finances are tight but even if they're not, do you keep one of your higher earners around if they're not a key part of the team, not just the squad? If the 2 loans were possible due to him leaving, we've got more cover now than before he went. Time will tell if they're better options for the team as a whole, compared to if we'd have kept him around. 

26 minutes ago, dingles staying down 4ever said:

Actually think all are equally relevent as each other. If you know your keeper is weak on crosses you need to stop the crosses. This should be done by being organised and do some basic defending.

Coaching takes time but a defensive general who controls the shape of the defence will help but that will only work if our full backs are not being utilised as midfielders

Fully agree, there are different ways to solve a problem. Look at Cambridge's goals - neither in my view were the fault of the keeper. First one we failed to clear our lines 3 times and nobody got out to block the shot. 2nd goal the cross could be stopped, Pik easily beaten and worst of all the striker had no defender within 5 yards, the CBs were literally marking nobody. 

There's been many times in the past where we've seen players literally throwing themselves in the way to block shots. We seem to be lacking some of that mentality when defending our box at the moment 

When Alan Nixon links Wharton away, it's usually met with a number of comments about how he knows nothing. He links Ennis away, which people wouldn't be too bothered about, and I don't think I've seen a single comment about how hopeless Nixon is. 

1 hour ago, Wheelton Blue said:

All these young players coming in...Tomasson must be party to these signings and agreeing to them.

Which brings me back to a point I made the other day and similar which @Tom (I think it was) made yesterday.

Tomasson can't keep making 'inexperience' excuses, if he is indeed giving the nod to these incomings..

If he's not given the option of experienced players as we can't afford them what is he supposed to do, decline all suggestions? Or if he wants numbers as the squad is thin, choose one experienced incoming over 2/3 players?

It's likely not as simple as this but yesterday we lost a squad player on one of the higher wages and brought in 2 squad players to cover the same position as well as other midfielder roles, and cover at left back where we didn't have it (as Batty hasn't been deemed good enough for a look in). 

If Gally was fit and someone offered to loan him and it enabled is to bring in a pacey winger and another striker, I imagine there'd be a fair few willing to take the punt. Yet, when fit, I reckon Gally is closer to starting games compared to where Trav was.

28 minutes ago, bigbrandjohn said:

Shame JDT didn’t make Hyam captain in the first place. Would have let Trav focus on  his game and feel less of a burden on his shoulders 

Would have been a bold move to take the captaincy off trav and give it to a new signing in his first summer. If you mean last summer, that would probably have put Trav's nose out of joint even more. He already wanted to go, it hardly convinces him to stay if the armband is taken off him. 

JDT on the captain's armband: "Dom Hyam will take over as captain and Sam Szmodics as vice-captain. Two lads who have been playing at a high level and always put the team first."

Too much to read into this that Trav wasn't putting the team first anymore? Either way I don't think many would have put him in the team ahead of Wharton and Tronstad. Yes you need depth and back up, but Trav clearly didn't want to bide his time.

Should we have kept an unhappy player and one who didn't like that he wasn't preferred for the holding role?

10 minutes ago, Exiled_Rover said:

Again, virtually giving away Phillips v actually giving him away.

Broughton made the best of a bad situation with a player that clearly didn't want to be at the club and literally held all the cards.

It's not the insult you think it is.

Whilst more of a reflection of the club, still one of the higher transfer fees we've received in recent seasons 

2 minutes ago, Ossydave said:

Ennis showed a few glimmers of hope, I've been banging on about just having a bit of presence up top at home and i think he can provide that more than Leonard. We missed him a bit when he came off, has it actually been confirmed whether he was injured or if it was just a planned sub to manage his minutes? I haven't seen it mentioned post match, seriously hope its the latter....

Jackson tweeted it was planned, and indicated no injury concerns from the match across the team. 

From the glimpses of him we've had, I think Ennis has decent movement and can play a hold up role as well. However, I'm reserving full judgement for 12 months. Brittain has shown how having a year of working under this coaching group and then having the necessary pre season can allow a completely different player to come through in year 2. 

6 hours ago, only2garners said:

You can’t seriously think that a player like Adam with his agent only gets information about PL wages from his mates in an England junior team?

No of course not. But it's one thing your agent saying club x and y would pay x amount, and another where players from half a dozen or more prem clubs tell you that you could be on however many times more just for being in the development squad at the big clubs. 

The concern would be if there's a release clause, even at £20m+ it's small pennies for most prem clubs. On the other hand, it'll reduce the likelihood of him thinking he should leave for better money now we've presumably increased his wage. One draw back of him playing for Eng is if players at prem clubs are telling him how much more he could be getting elsewhere