Paul Mellelieu

1 hour ago, OnionBalaji said:

Has anyone else had the rumour through of a bust up yesterday at the training ground between Ismael and some senior players? 

it's that time of year....

One win in nine, but results elsewhere going our way.

Funny how we were heroes at Boro and villains now.

I suspect that's the game won.

What a disappointment. 

I'm not sure what to think: is Val getting the best out of a poor and depleted squad that we all thought would be in the bottom three by Xmas, or should he be doing better?

Let's hope these results don't catch us out later in the season.

Taking off, so let’s have a couple of goals whilst I’m in the air.

I’d consider pushing cantwell further up the pitch.

Worry is we take it too easy.

cantwell needs the ball around the box.

Started well. One goal will be enough.

What’s the reason for him being left out?

What’s the Gueye situation?

1 minute ago, RevidgeBlue said:

Have they run out of hake with a hint of fennel?

That was the last three nights. 

Gin at Berlin airport. Coyb.

We have a de facto boycott - including by me for 18 months - so it will be difficult to prise away the most loyal fans.  And therefore, whilst it might not the most effective tactic, it might  have an impact.  So good luck.

Great work gents.

Pleased that Rev got to see why Tronstad is such an important player for us.

He goes, we win.  He should go every week.

We were gifted the game and looked very poor for long stretches.  Three points though.

A very offensive line up, going for a win.......I hope.

1 hour ago, Exiled in Toronto Mk2 said:

Having thought about this some more, I’m afraid to say I think it’s the wrong strategy being pursued in the wrong way.

Calling for a boycott sounds great to the fans already boycotting, but to the fans who aren’t, there’s nothing in the letter to make them consider doing so. 

1) It’s directed to the wrong audience - it’s a letter to the owners, not the attending fans.

2) “The Coalition” calling for a boycott is a long way from Red Robbo calling out the lads at Longbridge. They are by no means widely accepted as the voice of the majority. 

3) There is no argument, persuasion or rationale in the letter as to why a boycott will change anything. 

4) It’s too long, repetitious and reads like it was written by a committee (no doubt it was). It’s not exactly the Gettysburg Address or the “Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité” of the French Revolution.

When the ground isn’t empty against Watford, all that will have been achieved is a further loss in credibility.

 

I understand the points here, but something needs to move.

1 hour ago, chaddyrovers said:

invading the pitch is criminal offence and one you risk getting a record from, people need a clear record for their jobs, so are you serious suggestion people put their jobs at risk for that sort of action. 

I'm sorry, but I won't.  

You are a mug chaddy.  The club is being destroyed and can't see it.  Not even bling the frog.  Why you come here I don't know.

Dear god De Neve.

Joke of a ref.

The back line is very poor this season due to stupid decisions, poor recruitment and injury,

Under 21.

https://antiguaobserver.com/antiguan-defender-kylano-isaac-on-trial-in-the-uk/

Rev thinks our player of the season is crap, so no miss there.