Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

American

Members
  • Posts

    4831
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by American

  1. Are people on here saying that all Benni should do is score goals??

    Because if I remember correctly isn't that the reason Derb's was moved on because strikers have to offer more than goals.

    Derbs was moved on because he didn't score enough, even though it was his only job (plus the whole doesn't know where the corner flag thing is, and other rumored transgressions).

  2. Berner was brought in to provide experienced cover at left-back and left midfield. He also played at centre-back and centre-midfield with the reserves. With their job dependent on results, managers really can't be faulted for opting to use experienced players as back-up rather than a youngster who has not really impressed in the reserves.

    The point is that they can. These players help cause our vastly over inflated wage bill, and don't provide anything more than a youngster would. Just because a player has experience doesn't mean they are any good.

    Look at 2-3 seasons ago when Reid was AWFUL at right back when trying to come back from one of his injuries. Would Nolan have done any worse? But hey, we played the experienced player, so I guess it wasn't too bad.

    Unfortunately, with the high cost of relegation, and the lack of patience in managers, playing the more experienced player and having their higher wages on the books will always be the safe move. People talk about how a lot of the youth players bigged up by 6 haven't gone on to do anything, but fail to mention that a lot of the higher wage players who were playing instead haven't gone on to do anything either.

  3. No, they don't. They conducted the "come down on everyone extremely hard" approach - be it dealer or user.

    Just being caught in poccession in the States can, and does, lead to huge penalties - loss of benefits for life, a mandatory life obligation to tell an employer about past drug offences (they don't insist on the same thing for offences like rape or murder bizarrely).

    From the 80's onwards the US took an extremely hard approach to drug enforcement and this obviously hasn't worked.

    I'd be extremely surprised if they changed tact though.

    Actually, you have to tell your prospective employers about any felony convictions.

  4. If I knew I only had 5-10 years of prime earnings potential (if I didn't get a career ending injury earlier), I'd make the most of it.

    Don't see how I'm winding you up, just expressing an opinion you disagree with. That is allowed, isn't it?

    Still waiting for your response to the Lucas telling Hughes he intended to leave and that it was Hughes' decision to let him run down his contract, not his. He never turned down a move after he said he wanted to leave, yet you insist on blaming him for doing what most people in that situation would.

    What makes him any different than any of our other players who have left? They could have signed new contracts and stayed with the club.

  5. I'm sure LeChuck and Rev have turned down or never asked for a raise (and are still ignorant enough to forget the fact that it was Hughes' decision not to sell him when he was given 18 months notice that Lucas didn't want to re-sign).

    People move employers all of the time. I've been at the same place for 9 years, but I'd be a liar if I said I've never looked at what else is out there in terms of money or opportunity.

  6. The point is that Sparky was quite happy to see us get nothing when Lucas left so that he could line his own wallet. We were very fortunate that West Ham had that crazy January where they started paying obscene wages to average players.

    Made a couple corrections to your post to make it more factual. He never turned down a move, because we never tried to sell him.

  7. Symptomatic of the current era that CL discussions are happening on the PL thread!

    Barca without Marquez and Puyol are going to struggle defensivey at Stamford Bridge. Another supremely disciplied performance by Chelsea should see them through to Rome.

    Have a sneaking feeling they will be facing Arsenal there. That has probably sealed a Manc win at the Emirates then.

    That's a Barca/United final, then!

    I actually think that 0-0 away from home in the first leg gives Chelsea a slight disadvantage. Yes, they are home the second match, but if any goals are scored, they have to win, as a 1-1 draw is the same as a loss.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.