Wouldn’t be adverse to that either, let’s just all hope we get somebody in, to do nothing in January would make me despair at mowbray no matter how hard he “tried”

I was never given a name, however was told a prem player of decent calibre so I don’t think it was a youngster. If I was to guess, Freeman, but not got anything to suggest that other than he fits into mowbrays way of thinking

That would be a result if we got some money for king- personally don’t think he is Man Utd quality but you batter in ole

I don’t know the deal but I imagine it’s a loan, don’t think it’s the worst idea tbh

No you said going by his wiki he has been great anywhere he has been with assists and hat tricks, I was pointing out boro were happy to let him go- don’t think he shone there

Tbf he didn’t set boro alight, hence they sale

Yea it’s a weird one, he has looked a bit chubby and disheveled when Iv seen him this year, don’t know if maybe his attitude is holding him back

No need, just buy me a pint

Know your stuff ??

Fair enough, if we are talking going years back, don’t think I was a member then

Sure he has but I haven’t seen anything from unleaded- certainly not recently. Who did he break?

Haha I don’t know anything about that. Mowbray still keeps an interest in hibs though

Sometimes deals get held up ?‍♂️ Look back a few weeks for my Ronan Curtis post mate- get the date and then look for it being released by the press. Beat Sharpe by a good couple of days. Must read my posts with your eyes closed.

Would you not agree the club would rather keep things secret until it’s a done deal? Otherwise the press would be told of every transfer target , 90% are never disclosed. Just because a player is a named and goes onto sign it doesn’t mean that it wasn’t harmful - just means that another more interesting club weren’t wanting them or more money is getting paid in wages to get it over the line

You must have missed my posts. And the assombalonga was madon- which was picked up by media sources so completely believable and genuine. He never claimed it was done just that it was being worked on. Don’t need to be so cynical

Pretty much on the money ?

Haha I have no idea pal

Yea 100% but there is some trustworthy agents who will keep their word

Celtic wouldn’t stump up the cash for mcginn - where he wanted to go, we came in and I believe met fee and had discussions with mcginn but once villa got involved it was game over for us. I really don’t think mcginn broke down because we didn’t put money up, not from my understanding anyway

Leak was from the media. 100% media read club message boards . I have tested it. Not that I’m saying that’s where it came from In that instance, I was merely meaning leaks in general. but thanks for the support - appreciated

The summer we agreed the 7 million brereton deal and had freeman rejected for 5 million? The money wasn’t an issue. The rovers credit with interest is the leak ?‍♂️

An example of why names aren’t given out like sweets- John mcginn. Leaked and we lost out, we were 70% down the line with that one

Don’t always get names, in fact it’s pretty rare, do get told of deals being close etc, which is then given likewise by the club. Names are kept secret for a reason

Not taking it seriously at all, I get asked for leads, I give leads and then get criticised for it. But your right , maybe it just isn’t worth the hassle.

My breaking of gallagher, Armstrong, interest backed up by media of curtis, Martinez, sinclair and breaking of mulgrew leaving suggests not. But let’s not let facts get in the way. why would I create another account? What benefit would I get from that. had links to the club since the jack walker days when I knew his sister and brother in law. Lived in a place called lennoxtown. Somebody might be able to verify that. His name was frank. Hence then getting to know some rovers admin, some of which are still there. sigh. Having to verify again. Some of you deserve nothing