Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

BankEnd Rover

Members
  • Posts

    3569
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by BankEnd Rover

  1. Just now, BlackburnEnd75 said:

    Downing    Travis   Johnson     Rothwell   - team 1 

                             Dack

                            Graham

     

    Bennett   Smallwood  Evans   Armstrong       - team 2

                     Gallagher    Brereton

     

    Plus Davenport, Chapman, Nuttall.

    Might as well start finding a loan move for the under 23 lads as the are way down the pecking order rightly or wrongly.

    Team one is just power! Would love that to start with Butterworth/Buckly & Gallagher on as subs.

  2. Just now, roversfan99 said:

    Rothwell played for the weaker team on Saturday and again tonight, if I had to put money on it (thought this beforehand) itll be Armstrong and Downing v Charlton. Johnson and Evans over Travis too.

    What I'm thinking also. You'd just have to laugh if that happened wouldn't you.

  3. 9 minutes ago, skous18 said:

    How many goals have Adam scored for us in the last two weeks and how many goals have Smallwood and Evans scored combined since their arrival at Ewood -_-

    Nothing makes my blood boil more than hearing Evans & Smallwood. Honestly one (even better) both need to go. 

    • Like 3
  4. Just now, Bigdoggsteel said:

    OK let's just say we do sign a keeper and CB, we won't be in a bad spot then really. We have serious firepower. Defenders wil not relish coming up against Graham, Dack, Rothwell, Chapman, Downing and Armstrong. A lot of stuff for defenders to worry about there. Then if Brereton and Gallagher start chipping in as well. 

    Have ye watched the behind the scenes training videos on YouTube? Brereton banging them in. Maybe it's propoganda ? but there are a good few clips of him scoring. 

    Yeap. Saw a good clip of him skip past 2-3 players. Looked sharp - The kids a baby, there's potential there IMO.

    • Like 2
  5. 3 minutes ago, davulsukur said:

    At least if the Gallagher deal finally gets done, we can move onto other targets.

    Not a bad signing i don't think. Needs to be played correctly though.

    Must mean someone is for the chop, assuming it would be Nuttall.

    Thats the problem here. I will take him if the lad is played frequently and in his natural position. Will TM do that? I'm not sure.

  6. 16 minutes ago, K-Hod said:

    I think many are getting frustrated that we have signed loads of midfielders (which numerically, aren’t a priority), when we have areas of the team which are a much bigger priority, that need to be strengthened, but haven’t been yet. 

    I can understand, I really can! But there’s obviously still time to rectify it like, I just hope the defenders really are coming....(and a goalkeeper and a striker).

    I am guilty for jumping the gun too quickly. Sometimes I've been right, sometimes I've been wrong. Going to give it another 10 days. If we don't have at least a new GK or defender (our weakest areas) I will be worried.

    • Like 2
  7. Just now, davulsukur said:

    Absolutely insane if we don't get another first choice centre back.

    I appreciate that you can sign good free transfers but we missed out on the one we were hoping to sign.

    If Mowbray doesn't put some money behind this (if no free transfers are available) he has failed spectacularly for me.

    here here.

  8. Just now, Crimpshrine said:

    Feels to me like the budget is much lower this year compared to last summer.

    I think a deal for Gallagher would eat up virtually all the cash.

    So the choices are 

    1) Gallagher + cheap goalie + loan defender(s)

    2) Decent goalie + money spent on defender(s) ( No Gallagher )

    3) Sell someone (Travis ?) allowing us to afford Gallagher + decent goalie and maybe a defender.

    Loan market not really active yet so it may all happen approaching deadline day. 

    Just me thinking aloud. I'd go for option 2.

    Has to be 2. No other option for me - Certainly cannot be number 3.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.