Jump to content

M_B

Members
  • Posts

    2599
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by M_B

  1. 2 hours ago, RevidgeBlue said:

    Well, thank God they're all "aligned" or we might end up losing nearly all our home games or something. Oh errr..... hang on!

    What do you define as "it succeeding"?

    Cutting costs but going down?

    Cutting costs but scraping up in at best 19th?

    I'd define "it succeeding" as cutting costs yet still managing to maintain a similar League position to last season. Imo there isn't a snowballs chance in hell of that happening, they can be as aligned or onboard as they like.

    Don't know why you use the word aligned with such sarcasm,it's the most important thing.

    As for what success looks like, promotion has to be the ultimate aim. Whatever success looks like to different people,it definitely won't happen with any coach unless he's on board with what's happening recruitment wise. 

  2. 1 hour ago, aletheia said:

    Disagree. Bristol were dreadbul first half - so scared of conceding - and allowed us to play in their half so easily - and we took advantage well (and agree, we should have scored more.) The defending to allow Albeiousu to get in to set up a goad was really poor (but full credit to Ryan). We didn't sit  back second half - they forced us back by being far more aggressive (half time team talk?) but agree we dealt with it really well (just like Derby today) and was really pleased with no-nonsense defending.

    Just thought we made a team in 5th look poor on their own patch.

    Twine hardly got a kick,they created very little, just a pity the win was at such a cost. 

  3. 1 hour ago, aletheia said:

    So short sighted Rev. Derby defend far far better than Bristol. We were allowed to play first half against Bristol and took full advantage. Derby are well drilled and made life very difficult -doulbed up on de Neve and Albeiousu. 5 across the back, 3 in front  of that and no space to play in. Got their goals, and just sat in, worked extremely hard to nullify us. You have to have special players or sheer physicality to open up a side like that.

    Also, Bristol played far better in the second half, pressed us more and did not allow us to play as well as the first half.

    Thought we took it to Bristol first half and could have had more than one, sat back second half and defended well,hardly gave them a sniff. 

    Even the 10 minutes extra were seen out comfortably. 

    • Like 1
  4. 16 minutes ago, StHelensRover said:

    I prefer to look at his 13-14 year managerial record when deciding on his footballing acumen. He got in to playoffs during the covid season with Barnsley and got into the playoffs in German regional football about 13 years ago. That's all he has achieved. During that time he's had more clubs than Tiger Woods.

     

    Edit - sorry. sounds like I'm being an arse with you there when I read it back. Basically, I made my mind up about him before we ever appointed him, I never wanted him, have struggled to warm to him, see him as a journeyman and average at best. I haven't booed or jeered him at Ewood like some parts of the fan base, but I don't think he'll ever get us anywhere. Would love to end up with egg on my face but I won't.

    To me it's pointless getting rid of him cos whoever Gestede appoints won't be wanted.

    I'm prepared to see how we go. For now at least there's no doubt the players are with him. 

    • Like 2
    • Fair point 1
  5. 3 hours ago, roverblue said:

    You think he always planned to play a back 3 and 2 up front but was just waiting all this time for Cantwell to get injured to deploy it?

    I've no idea what he was thinking. Any manager needs to adapt to losing any player, would City play the same without Haaland? Would any win without Haaland mean that Pep would have stumbled upon a way of playing ?

    The signing of De Neve and Alebiosu would suggest that wing backs were always on the cards. The return of Wharton will also have made it more of a possibility. 

    To win the last 3 under the circumstances to me says more about Ismael's footballing acumen than luck. 

    • Like 2
  6. 4 hours ago, roverblue said:

    Agree with others in that since a move to 3 at the back we look much more comfortable and he seems to have stumbled into his best formation rather than it being by design.

    However 3 wins on the bounce has given me hope we will at least put up a fight to stay in the league as it looked like we were going out with a whimper 2 weeks ago.

    Outside of this managerial ability the squad at his disposal is as poor as it's been in years so when the injuries bite it could quickly go downhill again.

    Not keen on the "stumbled" opinion to be honest.

    Kevin Gallagher said the same about Mowbray when we went on a good run, rather  than hold his hand up  give credit where it was due.

    It's like putting a win down to luck. 

    • Like 6
  7. 19 minutes ago, roversfan99 said:

    Fantastic victory, big achievement to win 3 on the bounce. And fair play to Ismael, a man who has had lots of fair criticism, but hes changed system, hes got a very limited squad available to him but weve managed to grind out 9 crucial points from 3 games.

    I though we looked good in the first half and perhaps with a bit more care could have been more than 1 up. 

    The general standard of the second half by both teams was really poor, we just had to really dig in to get that over the line. I think the injury to Sykes leaving them a man short really helped because although we looked out on our feet.

    Performance wise. Ohashi was probably our best player, I think it suits him and Gudjohnsen to play together, although the latter wasnt as effective tonight. Miller I think clearly has very useful attributes and for 89 minutes did well, but his total moment of madness cost us Tronstad (who up to then was very good) and thankfully not a goal. Wharton and McLoughlin were solid. Alebiosu was excellent again first half then seemed to tire badly in the second. Hedges is best suited to being a wing back. Miroshita is a mixed bag but has ability and is a clear upgrade on Henriksson.

    The obvious worry has always been when you peel beyond our competitive first 11, we look really thin. That side that ended the game would really struggle on its own. Gueye up front, Pears in net, Forshaw in midfield, Henriksson in attacking midfield and Ribeiro in a back 3. God knows what sort of side will play at the weekend, I just hope that Wharton and Toth are ok and that we can get the others back after a much needed break.

    Didn't think we looked out on our feet at any point really, I feared the worst when Armstrong came on but we played out the last half hour comfortably. 

    • Like 1
  8. Cracking midweek away win, I'll bet they haven't been kept as quiet at home all season. 

    Man of the match is up for grabs between quite a few, I'll give it Miller but couldn't argue with Hedges, Hickman or Yuki.

    Only time they had a look in was when we gave them the ball, something we must get better at. Three brilliant wins on the bounce, well done everyone. 

    • Like 5
  9. 2 hours ago, Scotty1991 said:

    The fucking Iceman! Go on! Said it weeks ago his movement is class he just needs to be found! If he’s in the box he’ll score goals! 

    He missed a few good chances before he scored, keep getting in the right position and you'll bag eventually. 

    Now he's found his touch, I'm looking forward to seeing him link up with Cantwell. 

  10. 2 hours ago, joey_big_nose said:

    Who scored thought he was brilliant...

    image.png.f3466a249d4fd9817eb2639a1fcc5294.png

    Looking at the stats breakdown it seems to be because of his goals, key passes and "Aeriels Won". Which is weird as I wasn't that impressed with him in the air. Stats eh..

    image.png.62de7424e6990c95b5748d77539916e3.png

    Aye, I suppose that's the thing with stats.You can take them or leave them, but there are no preconceptions or favouritism involved, just the same criteria across every team. 

    • Like 1
  11. 13 minutes ago, Rover down South said:

    Can’t see Gudjohnsen & Gueye ever working together. 

    I think Ohashi or Tyjon need to play just off AG. He needed that first goal at the weekend and you can see what it meant to him. I think there’s many more to come from him and that number 9 role is his now.

    Gueye has the passion I wish other players would display, but he is nowhere near Championship level.

    As for Saturday, I’m going 2-2 with (TGH & Gudjohnsen for us)

    Gudjonson named in the Championship team of the week for last Saturday's games. 

×
×
  • Create New...