Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS, SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

Forever Blue

Members
  • Posts

    4020
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    29

Everything posted by Forever Blue

  1. If we get rid of Gally and SS without adequate replacements then Eustace’s job becomes impossible. He’s not been saying he wants 5 or 6 quality signings cos he’s a yes man. He’s been saying it because he knows he’s absolutely fucked without them. I actually think he could become a good manager for us. My only hope is that we do spend some of the SS money on the players he wants. I can’t imagine even Waggott and Venkys are going to leave Eustace to play a Championship season with the forward line that started at Wigan yesterday.
  2. So Hyam, Siggy and Dolan will also be sold presumably? Just give me a minute while I compose myself after seeing a Rovers fan state we wouldn’t let a player leave on a free🤣
  3. You’ve just agreed a few posts up🤣 He’s said he wants to keep everyone in the group. He’s said it more than once in the last week or so.
  4. Exactly. So when Nixon says Rovers he actually means Eustace.
  5. Spot on. Eustace had been quick to point out that the recruitment team are working hard when asked about the budget. The implication is obvious. He just hasn’t got to the ‘ask Steve and Suhail’ stage yet
  6. It’s clear Gally is being sold without his approval. He’s said as much.
  7. You’ve missed the point. If Rovers were ‘desperate’ to keep him it wouldn’t matter if Stoke had bid £800k or £1.5m
  8. BLO Blackburn Panthers
  9. Alan Myers saying small gap in SS valuation exists between us and Ipswich but that talks are progressing well. Sounds fairly imminent
  10. Are you interpreting what Nixon has said, or hinting at something that you know?
  11. If you’re not calling for them to sell up you are endorsing their ownership whether you care to admit or not.
  12. So to clarify, as it stands, WATR are not calling for Venkys to sell up?
  13. He said a while ago that Rovers had to be smart with their transfer business. So someone tonight asked him if this is what he meant i.e Rovers sell their best players and replace them with kids. His reply was ‘it’s escalated a bit’ since then. But apparently he has a few stories about Rovers tomorrow so ‘it’s escalated’ could mean anything. He may have used the wrong word. Maybe he meant ‘developed’ rather than escalated, which would have less negative connotations. Maybe we’re in for a few players? Or maybe the Venkys are bailing out? Who knows till tomorrow.,,,
  14. ‘Exert influence’. You’ve no contact with the owners and Waggott admits he just does what he’s told. How do you propose to exert influence, besides calling for the owners to go?
  15. I have, that’s why I asked you to confirm? Your response suggests you don’t know.
  16. Nixon saying the situation at Rovers has ‘escalated a bit’ whatever that means.
  17. I’m sure it’s just a coincidence that at the point that they’ve maxed out on ST sales, the fire sale has started.
  18. The silence is deafening.
  19. Nathan Jones claiming it’s a Gally/Baker swap deal with no fee involved. So we can rule that out.
  20. @Andy on here reported it earlier in the summer, and Rover Insider put the same on twitter an hour or two ago. Could be bollocks. Could be true. Who knows
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.