Nixon is a spin doctor that's what he is it's his job he takes snippets of info and rumour and spins them into tales and stories. His ability to play both sides and sit on the fence via his wording is legendary yet some still can't see it, others chose not to unless it suits. I think the main reason a lot on here flip flop between believing him then not is because unfortunately his positive spin usually turns out to be hot air whereas the negative stuff often follows through in reality.

He does not say Travis HAS been offered a 3 year deal by Rovers.

And selling both would just about cover the 4 or so they requested from India. It's all about that black hole now and in a few months there'll be another one.

Cult hero to present era fans, Speedie style but at the other end of the division.

He was hardly 'forcing' a move anyway he was gone the min they made a serious bid the haggling was just over the fee and terms of it. His release clause had been hit so he was fully entitled to go for that figure it's a legal agreement as far as we know. Fact is he turned out in some games afterwards and risked injury blowing it for him. If he was the twohat some are making him out to be he would have flatly refused like no doubt quite a few others have.

A monumental overreaction he's hardly Rudy Gestede.

No thanks i'll not bother i'd much prefer someone to scroll through his tweets and replies.

Honesty is the best policy and something sadly lacking in the Ewood boardroom so fair play to him he isn't the first and won't be the last but he has the balls to admit it. Never ever let us down on the pitch even just before he moved unlike one or two others.

They knocked off £20 🤣 Even at the time some said it was a con trick so they could then say 'no point bothering'. When nobend first did theirs an adult ST behind the goal i think was £100 cheaper than Rovers at the time, Bolton was even cheaper but obviously a league lower. It's hard to fathom are they complete crackpots or just con jobs covering their own arses.

Well you can ask him, i can't iv'e been blocked since 2012 so have to rely on others quoting him. The quote i saw said Rovers offered him a good deal but only 12 months and he wanted 2 years which Derby were willing to match.

It's embarrassing and absolutely the fault of this ridiculous regime but nobody gets held to account because the CEO whose been hiding under a COO title has now created the narrative we only have 9k fans. Which is odd considering the average home attendees over a season is around 13.5k. But yes we can't sell anymore so no point bothering.

Not necessarily and like i said ask your mate Nixon it's funny you don't chose to believe his words when it suits.

He's on a free transfer and his contract here is till end of June so nothing will happen before then.

Yes i'm all for protecting the assets but they jumped the gun there based more on the hype than anything, he obviously looked good in training but had about half a dozen good first team performances to his name. Can only assume it was on modest money and that's why he's still here.

Just because he hasn't yet doesn't mean he won't do as long as it's on the table.