wilsdenrover

Max hotel claim is £100 per person (max 24 people) Same for travel.

Maximum claim allowed by Ipswich would be £4,800. Is Pasha that tight…

Here’s the rule:

It is permitted but I doubt that will be their ruling.

From EFL website:

The rules say absolutely nothing about the 75th minute (or any other specific minute) being relevant to the EFLs decision.

Most likely but not certainly.

A Match is 90 minutes so I don’t think we should be awarded the win. The time left, the score and them being down to ten men means I don’t think a full replay is appropriate either. That leaves a partial replay as the fairest outcome, in my opinion of course.

Part replay is allowed (as per my earlier post) This feels like an ideal example of when this should be used. Despite this I anticipate a full replay.

They could. I doubt they will.

I thought they’d have made an application to the court re this as soon as the previous order had been made. Nothing showing yet though.

Yes they still need to stipulate this by filing an affidavit with the court. This has to be done within one working day of the funds being sent.

Permission to remit funds without guarantee granted two weeks ago. Affidavit yet to be lodged to say monies have been sent…

I expect they’re waiting for you to pay for the prize.

Perhaps Tronstad does want to go back to Norway. If that is the case, maybe just maybe we should be trying to persuade him to change his mind.

On holiday, forgot what day it was 🤦‍♂️ Maybe I should do that more often 😄

I think when one ‘reason’ disappears another one takes its place.

No, the court case and the investigation are two separate things (albeit the former is only happening because of the latter). The Adjudicating Authority will rule re any fine (max circa £7.7-£8.5 million depending on source of exchange rate used) - I believe they have a year to do so (I’m not sure whether this is from submission of the complaint by the Directorate of Enforcement or from when they then first convene).

The investigation into the Venkys has reached the Adjudicating Authority stage who will decide if and what punishment (fine) they’ll receive. The court cases instigated by the Venkys will next be heard in November, the website isn’t currently working so I can’t check the exact date (I think it’s the 12th). As far as I recall (can’t double check as above) they’ll now just be arguing over which version of the relevant law should have applied to the monies mentioned in Venkys original petition to the courts. This mattered as under the preceding version they would’ve had the certificate needed to send monies over but under the new version they did not (as the legislation change included changing which institution issues this certificate). I don’t see why it matters any more as the various interim orders have allowed Venkys to send monies anyway. Maybe they’ll be trying to remove the remaining conditions (having to show the money is used for its stated purpose). I hope that makes sense.

Oi 😁

Him playing for Hungary will make no difference for now given their current ranking. Doesn’t matter though as, so long as he remains first choice, he’ll have enough points (% of minutes played for us + quality of league we play in) to convert in January.

I fear I may start having to talk to my wife again 😁😁

If we can afford to pay more be critical of the fact we’re not willing to. If we can’t afford to pay more be critical of what’s lead to this. Neither position, in my opinion, is defendable.

I think you’ve outlined perfectly the difference between a wage budget and a wage structure. The first is a very arbitrary limit, the second is more fluid and would have reasoning behind why a player is in a certain range and what’s necessary for him to move into a further one. If these are clearly conveyed to the players they then can’t be in any doubt as to what they need to do to achieve a pay rise. The club should also be keeping an eye on other clubs’ pay structures so what we offer can be adjusted to remain as competitive as possible.