Silencio Posted May 12, 2013 Share Posted May 12, 2013 Jimmy was very high up in the Masons (33rd degree, I believe). This would made him very influential in/with the Police and would explain his close links to the Royals, Heath, Thatcher. And all that, rather than whether Dave Lee Travis felt somebody's tit in 1972 is the real story here, and one that the authorities are clearly very keen to take the focus from! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
thenodrog Posted May 13, 2013 Share Posted May 13, 2013 Jimmy was very high up in the Masons (33rd degree, I believe). This would made him very influential in/with the Police and would explain his close links to the Royals, Heath, Thatcher. And all that, rather than whether Dave Lee Travis felt somebody's tit in 1972 is the real story here, and one that the authorities are clearly very keen to take the focus from! bish.... sorry but even Jimmk2 can't pin Masonic involvement on Margaret Thatcher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Norbert Posted May 13, 2013 Share Posted May 13, 2013 The illuminati touch up kids! That is a new angle to me, that all this is linked to freemasons, along with global capitalism, the UN, space lizards............. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silencio Posted May 13, 2013 Share Posted May 13, 2013 bish.... sorry but even Jimmk2 can't pin Masonic involvement on Margaret Thatcher. As if all those around Thatcher, Blair, any PM you wish to name aren't Freemasons, Theno. The 33rd Degree Masons are running the whole show and Savile was one of them, he stayed at Thatcher's house on most New Year's evenings. Not really about Labour/Tory this as the reason why they are all so similar is because those at the top of each party are serving a Masonic agenda... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amo Posted May 13, 2013 Share Posted May 13, 2013 Are all Freemasons pedos? Is it like, one of the rules? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backroom Mike E Posted May 13, 2013 Backroom Share Posted May 13, 2013 Jimmy was very high up in the Masons (33rd degree, I believe). This would made him very influential in/with the Police and would explain his close links to the Royals, Heath, Thatcher. And all that, rather than whether Dave Lee Travis felt somebody's tit in 1972 is the real story here, and one that the authorities are clearly very keen to take the focus from! Typo? Isn't 3rd the highest degree of Freemasonry? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thenodrog Posted May 13, 2013 Share Posted May 13, 2013 As if all those around Thatcher, Blair, any PM you wish to name aren't Freemasons, Theno. The 33rd Degree Masons are running the whole show and Savile was one of them, he stayed at Thatcher's house on most New Year's evenings. Not really about Labour/Tory this as the reason why they are all so similar is because those at the top of each party are serving a Masonic agenda... Hmmm Bliar converted to Catholicism only in 2007... the year he handed over to Gordy. That timing could fit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ABBEY Posted May 15, 2013 Share Posted May 15, 2013 Remy arrested today. I'm not condoning in shape or form any of all this but WHY are men being named before they get a fair trial ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backroom Mike E Posted May 15, 2013 Backroom Share Posted May 15, 2013 Remy arrested today. I'm not condoning in shape or form any of all this but WHY are men being named before they get a fair trial ? Agreed. People (for any crime) should only be named after conviction by a jury. Not after arrest or even after being charged. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amo Posted May 16, 2013 Share Posted May 16, 2013 Remy arrested today. I'm not condoning in shape or form any of all this but WHY are men being named before they get a fair trial ? Double standards, innit? I'm pretty sure when that Lostprophets guy got arrested for this kind of thang, they kept the woman's name private for 'legal reasons', even though she conspired with him to do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thenodrog Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 Are all Freemasons pedos? Is it like, one of the rules? Who knows? It's a secret. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T4E Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 Certainly raises questions over the "secret handshake" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
92er Posted June 18, 2013 Share Posted June 18, 2013 Agreed. People (for any crime) should only be named after conviction by a jury. Not after arrest or even after being charged. I have a lot of sympathy with your comments. However, from something I've read, I understand Hall's initial attack on the charges made against him lead to a large number of other victims coming forward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backroom Mike E Posted June 18, 2013 Backroom Share Posted June 18, 2013 I have a lot of sympathy with your comments. However, from something I've read, I understand Hall's initial attack on the charges made against him lead to a large number of other victims coming forward. Could they not come forward after conviction and further trials conducted? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparky Marky Posted June 18, 2013 Author Share Posted June 18, 2013 Could they not come forward after conviction and further trials conducted? Best to get in now while it's hot news.....more compo you see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backroom Mike E Posted June 18, 2013 Backroom Share Posted June 18, 2013 Best to get in now while it's hot news.....more compo you see. How does that benefit the courts? Under my idea (altho it isn't MY idea) the public wouldn't know until conviction. So it eliminates the 'more compo' idea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Majiball Posted June 18, 2013 Share Posted June 18, 2013 Are all Freemasons pedos? Is it like, one of the rules? Would bring a whole new meaning to Ladies night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.