Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I assumed this was down to change in coach and support staff and churn in players in and out the door.

Edited by Rogerb
Posted
2 hours ago, Tomphil2 said:

How on earth do we end up with another 45 employees ?

More people and the marketing is worse than ever 

  • Like 2
Posted
3 hours ago, Herbie6590 said:

I couldn’t find a disclosure in the VLL accounts but the club banks with State Bank of India so I think we can assume it’s the same entity. 

An important point on administration - the VLL accounts specifically say that there is  NO DEBENTURE securing the overdraft. The bank therefore cannot call in an administrator, as it does not have the legal right so to do.

For Rovers to go into administration they would have be placed there voluntarily by the directors. (See Sheffield Weds). This means the club would have to be trading insolvently (which opens up the directors to personal legal action) & so the directors protect themselves by calling in an admin. 

I suspect we were getting pretty close to that point until Adam was sold. That relieved the pressure. That’s why Waggott kept trumpeting the fact that the bills being paid on time was a cause for celebration. 

The increase in O/D is interesting - because from my days in corporate lending, an unsecured loan of £12m would usually require at the very least some form of inter-company guarantee or personal guarantees from the directors to “focus the minds” of the owners.

If this O/D is truly, completely unsecured then SBI must really value the group relationship & be making plenty of money out of the arrangement fees. 

So, going off the Sheff Wed situation, am I right in thinking that if the V's were ever to put us into administration, due to the EFL "25p in the pound" rule, any potential purchaser would have to pay them a minimum of £55m?

That could be extremely problematic.

Posted
8 hours ago, RevidgeBlue said:

So, going off the Sheff Wed situation, am I right in thinking that if the V's were ever to put us into administration, due to the EFL "25p in the pound" rule, any potential purchaser would have to pay them a minimum of £55m?

That could be extremely problematic.

Possibly yes…I guess you could argue that if they put us in admin they’d truly be beyond caring about any collateral damage & at least one relegation would be assured. 

There’s no getting away from the fact that Rovers have League One income but a Championship cost base.

If I was tasked with running Rovers to break even then I’d be warning the fans to expect League Two football…

Posted
9 hours ago, RevidgeBlue said:

So, going off the Sheff Wed situation, am I right in thinking that if the V's were ever to put us into administration, due to the EFL "25p in the pound" rule, any potential purchaser would have to pay them a minimum of £55m?

That could be extremely problematic.

And it could well be why they refuse to write off any of the debt (something it appears the auditor feel they should do…)

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...