Jump to content

Boycott Or Not?

BRFCS.com
 Share

Recommended Posts

Recommended

Posted by rog of the rovers,

Shameless plug alert, but we recorded a 4000 Holes Podcast last night and discussed the planned boycott at length in section 3. Should 'drop' on Friday morning as usual. Worth a listen, in my humble opinion. Myself, @Herbie6590, Holly, Rory Larmer and Rich Sharpe   https://www.brfcs.com/podcasts/the-what-now-show-i-need-a-justification
Recommended by Herbie6590
  • Like

7 reactions

Go to this post
Leonard Venkhater World Cup

Leonard Venkhater

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, rigger said:

I remember when the Rovers seemed to underestimate the crowds, rumor was, it was to lower their tax bill.

Funny. I was telling my kids about that very thing. I remember the collective murmur, when the "attendance" was given out!

How times change

  • Replies 676
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

J*B
J*B

We seem to still be overlooking the biggest argument to be made to anyone not willing to miss one home game. ”Name one thing that has improved in the 15 years of Venky’s ownership?” They can

Herbie6590
Herbie6590

I’m not talking about meetings…running a company isn’t about meetings.  I’m talking about effective corporate governance. Checks & balances in the way things are done. Without a proper organi

Herbie6590
Herbie6590

I think a finance director is possibly quite useful, as would be a sales & marketing director plus a chief operating officer. That way you don’t have concentration of powers, you have a prope

Posted Images

RevidgeBlue World Cup

RevidgeBlue

Posted
Posted
51 minutes ago, Leonard Venkhater said:

Funny. I was telling my kids about that very thing. I remember the collective murmur, when the "attendance" was given out!

How times change

Yes some of the under reporting of the Crowds for bigger games back in the day was quite ludicrous - presumably to save on tax.

I've often wondered how that works these days the other way round. ST monies are already banked so there's no harm done from a tax perspective in massaging the figures upwards to make them look more respectable, but some of the over-reporting recently looks way in excess of numbers of missing ST holders.

But surely no-one would make themselves potentially liable for tax they shouldnt be paying!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing


×
×
  • Create New...