joey_big_nose

Teams below. Most interesting is Nyambe playing centreback again with Magloire on the bench. Maybe that is where we are thinking of using him this term? Tonight’s team to play @buryfcofficial .Leutwiler, Rankin-Costello, Nyambe, Grayson, Hart, Smallwood (c), Johnson, Buckley, Rothwell, Brereton, Gallagher. Subs: Fisher, Magloire, Mulgrew, Bell, Downing, Travis, Dack, Armstrong, Graham.

We will definitely be playing 4231. A formation like you propose totally sidelines Dack. I'm sticking with : -----------------------Walton Nyambe----Lenihan----Williams----Hart? ----------------Travis--------Johnson -------Downing-----Dack------Rothwell ------------------------Graham Subs : Fisher, Mulgrew, Bennett, Evans, Armstrong, Gallagher, Brereton Its a shame that Buckley, Davenport, Chapman all will struggle to get a place on the bench.

The starting line up was disappointing, but hopefully the performances re-emphasised Travis and Rothwell have to start come Charlton

Ill be really annoyed if Mulgrew is ahead of Williams or new signing, and absolutely furious of Travis is dropped entirely.

A lot of truth to this. We have spent 5m and 7m on strikers in the last year. I don't think we can argue a lack of investment as one of our owners foibles. Most other clubs in Championship would love to be in our financial position. Obviously this does not eradicate their awful mismanagement and continued lack of engagement. But equally it could be a lot worse if they turn the cash off. It's a really terrible position to be. To hate someone, yet be entirely dependent on them. If they walked away we would be the next Bolton.

Team I'd like to see on Sunday --------------------------Fisher Nyambe----Lenihan---Magloire-----Bell ----------------Travis--------Johnson ----Downing--------Dack---------Rothwell -----------------------Gallagher Bring on during the game : Graham, Armstrong, Buckley, Evans, Hart, Butterworth, Brereton Williams.

I get where you're coming from but we have limited resources. Starting partnership of Travis and Johnson, with Evans, Davenport and Buckley backing up is good for me. Rather spend the money we have on sorting defence and keeper.

Oh, I thought he meant a second keeper

I'd say out of that the second centreback is a necessity, goal keeper and left back nice to have. However I don't get central midfield at at all. We've literally got seven players who can play there from established talent (Travis, Johnson) mediocre plodders (Evans, Smallwood, Bennett) to promising youngsters (Davenport, Buckley). Plus Rothwell can slot in there too (though I see him more as a number 10 / inside forward). Why would we sign more there? Only going to push Davenport and Buckley further away from the team.

I can't really see how Buckley and Butterworth will get in to be perfectly honest given who we have signed. Would mean dropping very experienced / proven players / new signings. They would really need to tear up trees or there be an absolutely huge injury crisis.

Have to say Bennett's not going to start central mid as we signed Johnson, and he's not going to start attacking mid as we signed Downing and Gallagher. If he's going to get a berth it might be right back but I wouldn't put money on it. Partly as we might sign someone, partly because Mowbray might decide to give Nyambe a long run. I think Mowbrays philosophy is you need a certain amount of experience. With signing Downing and Johnson I believe he will relax in retaining experience in other areas

Could Rangers be resigning Adam? That would make sense. Just a case of crossed wires in saying it's a Blackburn player. Also he did play with Gerrard at Liverpool

That would be utterly unacceptable. Rothwell looks the most promising young player we've signed since Dack. And before that you'd have to go back to Cairney (who was also ridiculously sold).

I know, it's odd. The fear has slipped into my mind that we are anticipating Dack leaving and switching to two up front. What we have done makes a lot of sense when you think of it that way. Edit - to be fair to Mowbray we all know it's highly likely Dack will leave by the 2020/21 season unless somehow miraculously we get promoted - and indeed he could get a long term injury - so it could be argued it's good planning for that eventuality.

I agree with what your saying but by the same token would you need Chapman, Brereton, Gallagher and Armstrong all on the bench. Not really necessary either, and I can't see Mulgrew being dropped entirely from the squad as much as he should be. Big loser is Davenport. Really hard to see how he gets in the squad unless we have injuries which is annoying as he has a lot of promise. Smallwood needs to be let go of as he has no chance, and Evans only retained to cover a major injury crisis.

Could do that, would probably end up as more of a diamond with Johnson at the base. But would you really want to drop Dack deeper into the midfield, lose all our width and drop Graham entirely? To me it would seem mega weird. For what it's worth I would say we are likely to line up : -------------------------New GK Nyambe----Lenihan (c)----new CB----Bell ------------------Travis----------Johnson ---------Downing-------Dack-------Rothwell -----------------------------Graham Subs : Leut, Williams, Mulgrew, Bennett, Armstrong, Gallagher, Chapman/Brereton If I was Brereton I would be thinking getting on the pitch is going to be very tricky.

Don't really watch or like cricket, but tuned in for the last two hours as it was the final and it was absolutely unbelievable. Hands down one of the most intense things I've ever watched. Crazy. Delighted for England, gutted for NZ, will undoubtedly watch more one day cricket in future.

I like him as a player. I am however confused why we bought him when we clearly need defenders and in Ben Brereton we have a very similar player. If we play 4231 as we surely will, with Dack guaranteed the 10, and Graham the 9 it means we have Rothwell, Chapman, Downing, Brereton, Armstrong and Gallagher chasing the other two attacking spots, and the odd covering role when Graham or Dack are injured. And that's not to even to mention Nuttall, Samuel and Butterworth. Seems a case of over supply to me.

Don't really think so, we give general statements on priority all the time.

Only thing I can think with the defence is maybe TM did a review and decided Lenihan, Williams, Mulgrew along with Nyambe and Magloire as cover is sufficient. However if he did come to that conclusion he should be sacked. Our only good enough CB is Lenihan and he is injury prone. All the rest are not good enough, with Mulgrew being an absolute liability of the highest order and also injury prone. I have to pray despite the lack of surface level evidence the management team are working furiously on CB deals behind the scenes. If I was them I would release a press statement that defence is a priority just to give clarity.

Would be odd as we've signed Chapman and Downing to play wide, plus got Armstrong kicking around.

Yup Id rather survive with Brereton, Armstrong and Nuttall as back ups and have a decent defence, than have Gallagher who will struggle to start regularly and a mess of a defence.

Yes - 4231 really suits him. I really want to see us to consistently start Graham up front, Dack at 10, Rothwell on the left and Chapman/Downing on the right. Will be our best attacking line in years. Johnson and Travis have the workrate and quality to build a strong platform for that attacking line to prosper. All for naught though if the defence and GK isn't radically overhauled.

Main issue for me is that it pushes Dack further away from goal. He has had a lot of success playing very far forward, pretty much as a second striker, and scores a lot of goals as a result. Putting two ahead of him would make him less effective imo.