Ok, now that the usual quick fire people on here (no names - you know who you are) have had their two penneth, lets try for some reasoned debate.
First condolences to the casualties and their families.
Next, although of little comfort to those involved, we seem to have lesser carnage to that in Madrid, even if figures rise - a minor miracle considering much of this outrage was underground.
If events are at all related to Iraq as some media (inc Peter Allen - 5 Live ) are asking, let's consider the following....
Afghanistan and Iraq both unfolded after 9/11. So what triggered that fateful day?
I wonder if it was US foreign policy over many decades, all over the world, but principally in the Middle East.
Remember that Israel occupies Palestine, and that there are allegedly more Jews in New York than all of Israel.
If Spanish and British govts had allied more closely with the UN and not the US, I wonder if the attacks would have been avoided.
Many 1000's have been killed on BOTH sides in Iraq and most observers seem to accept that there were no weapons of mass destruction, (yet N Korea, Chile and Mugabe are left alone - no oil?).
The US is the most powerful nation and therefore easily able to dismiss global warming and African policies with ease. Easy then to see how little progress can be made and further atrocities inevitable with the US so protectionist.
I would rather see Britain aligned with the EU (if we could overcome our differences) , which would also create a far bigger and more democratic trading block than the US.