I think this is wrong, certainly as far as making any complaint goes.
There isn't one fan group, there are many. The club would argue the FF is representative of the most diverse range of fans.
Many of the attendees represent specific fan groups.
An example is K-Hod represents this forum and opemly asks if any members wish any questions to be asked.
Duncan represents WATR as another example.
So the club will continue to comply at the most basic level (tick) which most of us find unacceptable.
We will need to read their new Fan Engagement Plan when it gets published.
My opinion is the only way to get them, is for the Fans Forum to have a vote of no confidence in the current process. Perhaps also to say they will not attend further meetings until the open, recorded, consultation meetings are reinstated.
No FF meetings mean the club cannot fullfil its obligations, as it has left itself with all its eggs in the FF basket.
However that won't happen because some of the attendees hold a vastly different personal opinion to the vast majority of fans.
Glen,
How many of the fans forum members are part of groups within the coalition or individually support it ?