Venkys wanted to send money in April. They have been impeded from doing so for the past 2 months. What do you not grasp. ? And yes, by and large they are choosing not to and let the club fund itself. However, as proven, when they need to, there are significant impediments.

Several impediments. 1. Having to apply to the court to send funds - or they can't. 2. Having to put 100% previously or 50% this time into a bank guarantee. 3. Getting into court in the first place. In this instance, they applied 26th March to be able to transfer urgent funds to cover April-June essential outgoings. 2 months to get into court. So in theory next month they need to request transferring funds to coverJuly-Sept outgoings. They won't do. Q3 is being funded by player sales and (probably) transfer installments, aided by more cost cutting (downgrading). 100%

Well on the way to 600 pages.

Don't forget we need to sell to fund our transfer budget (Gestede interview). Probably around 3 to be sold, just a case of which 3. Hedges may be one.Brittain and Pickering ? The most likely scenario is 1 first team player per position with an U21 as backup (pathways). This is only the first season of a 3 year project to maybe challenge again in 3 years (Gestede interview). Priority is self sustainability (purgatory) with the owners putting no more funds in. Well they can't, even if they wanted to.

Agree but then so do they. As publically announced, after June 30th we will have a clear out, promote from the academy and start an exciting 3 year project to hopefully challenge again in 3 years.

No. Because you attend to represent BRFCS members. And because you specifically said that you would.

@K-Hod It appears O2G now has gone full on protcting the regime, saying ST numbers were not discussed and are not in the minutes. Therefore please now confirm the number as per your earlier committment to do so.

@only2garners whilst we wait for the chair to get round to it, please can you tell your fellow forum members and fellow Rovers fans, simply the number of STs which were reported sold. Please just type the number. Thanks.

@K-Hod according to his post in the other thread, O2G does not know but concludes it will probably take a while. The question isn't when you will see the minutes. You attended on behalf of the forum members. You already know what was said but are choosing to keep it from your members. More than enough time has passed. Regardless whether or not the delay is from the club or the chair, it is not acceptable to take this long to update members / fellow supporters. Please tell us the Number of STs sold which was given at the meeting.

Thanks @K-Hod The reason I am asking you specifically, rather than the others is (please correct me if I am mistaken) that you attend to represent this forum and its members ? When can we expect to find out as a backstop to further delays of the club publishing the minutes ?

@K-Hod please can you let us (BRFCS members) know if you have a mental deadline to tell us the ST number reported to you at the FF. Or will you just wait indefinately until the minutes are eventually published ?

The minutes of the meeting held almost 2 weeks ago cannot be amended to update the figure to post pay day. The minutes are the minutes. Whatever number was reported in public will need to be published in public. Their only option is to edit out. That would not only be a disrespect to all Rovers fans, for which the meeting is supposed to satisfy their EFL obligation to fan engagement, but also a personal Fuck You to the FF members. I would hope O2G has been on the phone and told them to sort it out. I expect the number to be published on here on Tuesday evening if the minutes have not been published. I expect the number to be published on here immediatley in the event that edited minutes are published.

So does this mean BRFCS has officially thrown its considerable weight behind the coalition ? @Herbie6590

@K-Hod please can you tell us the number of STs sold from the FF. The club is clearly deliberately not publishing the minutes. No point respecting their pathetic petty rules when they do not respect you, I or any other Rovers fan.

If the club has failed to publish the minutes by tomorrow evening, isn't it fair that you tell us at that point ? If the club purposely delays, which for me they already are, they are effectively gagging you from passing critical information to the fans for which the FF is the only source of communication. Waggott keeps talking about open and transparent communication so I can't see how he can take offence by information being passed down, which he has already put in the public domain at the meeting.