Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS, SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

Mashed Potatoes

Members
  • Posts

    2846
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Mashed Potatoes last won the day on December 13 2022

Mashed Potatoes had the most liked content!

Recent Profile Visitors

3756 profile views

Mashed Potatoes's Achievements

Champions League

Champions League (8/9)

  • Great Content Rare
  • First Post Rare
  • 28 Days Later
  • Week Streak Rare
  • One week done

Recent Badges

2.2k

Reputation

  1. The WSL - women's equivalent of the Premier League - had an average attendance last season of just 6662 so there are obviously a lot of fools out there if you are correct.
  2. I don't know enough about the Fans Forum but according to one or two posts on here membership is by invitation whereas the expectation is that the supporters group will be democratically elected - so it doesn't meet the requirement. Others may know better.
  3. They meet just the one group of supporters, who have to be representative of the fanbase as a whole, and have to hold "regular" meetings. Separately the EFL currently require 2 meetings a year to be held with a fans forum although it remains to be seen if that requirement will continue now this legislation has been introduced.
  4. I think you're right - a question for the club is what are their plans for establishing the supporters group now that the legislation has been enacted.
  5. It isn't the people who operate the place who would have their licence to operate revoked but the club, which would not then be allowed to participate in English football in the top professional leagues thereby rendering the club insolvent - it's not going to happen just for the sake of the occasional difficult meeting with supporters.
  6. I don't think that will happen. As stated above, the new law places a statutory obligation on clubs to hold regular meetings with a representative group of supporters. Any club which was in breach of that obligation could potentially have their licence to operate withdrawn by the Independent Regulator.
  7. Isn't it more likely that we will have them "well sussed" ?
  8. Yes, I was aware of the requirement regarding future plans for fan engagement. The problem of course is that the language in the Act and the explanatory notes is so vague that it will be some time before anybody can be sure of what quite is going to be required of our or any other club. In the meantime provided meetings continue to go ahead I suspect that delays of a few weeks in the release of minutes will not be seen by the Regulator as an issue.
  9. I think the EFL rules - which to a degree may be superseded by the new rules in the Football Governance Act - are that clubs are required to meet twice a season with a representative group of supporters. Not sure what the rules if any are regarding the release of minutes but I doubt if a delay of 2 or 3 weeks in release of the minutes means that those rules have been broken.
  10. The recently enacted Football Governance Act requires that clubs hold regular meetings with a representative group of supporters.
  11. How can you know what he was offered ? Maybe it was fair and what he's looking for is excessive - I don't know, nobody on here does.
  12. Even if the player has been offered a new contract on no worse terms ?
  13. Yes, he will certainly have suitors - the question is whether he and his agent have significantly over-estimated the size of the financial offer that he can command.
  14. They showed a lot of ambition when Mel Morris owned them - too much as it turned out because it bankrupted them.
  15. Well, it's a point of view I suppose.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.